Isarsteg Nord near Freising, Germany
The bridge structure of Isarsteg as integrating artwork fits perfectly into the surrounding landscape. Taking nature as an example, the bridge spans the Isar river like a branched limb. Together, the ramps, stairs, columns, and horizontal beams represent the spatial framework. The pedestrian and cycle bridge, in total 525 ft long, was made of weather-resistant structural steel, S355 J2G2W (corten steel).
City of Freising, Building Division of the Municipal Administration for Road and Bridge Construction
|Project Management, Structural Analysis||
Bergmeister Ingenieure GmbH
Arch. Christoph Mayr, J2M Architekten
Dr.-Ing. Josef Taferner, Bergmeister Ingenieure GmbH
Dr.-Ing. Oliver Englhardt, &structures
Dipl.-Ing. Matthias Gander und Dipl.-Ing. Philipp Prighel,
Bergmeister Ingenieure GmbH
Prof. Antonio Capsoni, B&C Associati
The engineering office Bergmeister Ingenieure used the RFEM and SHAPE-THIN programs for the structural analysis of the 3D structure.
The structural design of the bridge was carried out in a sustainable manner. The slim bridge is a rigid, statically indeterminate frame structure. All components, including the foundation and the abutment, are rigidly connected to each other.
The maximum span of the bridge amounts to 180 ft and the width to 12.30 ft. The superstructure, the columns, and the stairs consist of keel-shaped, torsional rigid box sections.
The bridge deck consists of a reinforced concrete flange with a thickness of 5.9 in and a concrete quality of C35/45. It is rigidly connected to the cover plate t = 0.98 in of the steel box section by welded studs. The studs have a distance of 1.64 ft in the transverse direction and 1.97 ft in the longitudinal direction.
The bridge has been cambered by the deformation components from the self-weight. Under the maximum variable load, the structure deforms by about 4.4 in, which corresponds to l/504. The dynamic analysis resulted in a natural frequency of 1.33 Hz for the first mode shape. To ensure user comfort, a vibration damper was arranged.
The aesthetic structure of the Isarsteg received the German Steel Construction Award in 2016 and second place in the Engineering Prize of the Bavarian Chamber of Engineers in 2017. Moreover, it received a nomination for the German Bridge Engineering Award in 2018.
Do you have questions or need advice?
Contact our free e-mail, chat, or forum support or find various suggested solutions and useful tips on our FAQ page.
RF-/HOHLPROF add-on module for RFEM/RSTAB | Ultimate limit state designs of welded hollow section connections according to EC 3
RFEM add-on module RF-LOAD-HISTORY | Consideration of plastic deformations from previous load conditions
RFEM/RSTAB add-on module RF-/STEEL BS | Design of steel members according to BS 5950 or BS EN 1993-1-1
RFEM/RSTAB add-on module RF-/JOINTS Steel-DSTV | Standardized connections in steel buildings according to EC 3
RFEM/RSTAB add-on module RF-/FE-LTB | Lateral -torsional buckling analysis according to theory II. Order (FEM)
The material model Orthotropic Masonry 2D is an elastoplastic model that additionally allows softening of the material, which can be different in the local x- and y-direction of a surface. The material model is suitable for (unreinforced) masonry walls with in-plane loads.
- In RF‑CONCRETE Surfaces, I obtain a high amount of reinforcement in relation to a lever arm that is almost zero. How is such a small lever arm of internal forces created?
- How can I display membrane stresses in the results of RF‑STEEL Surfaces?
- What is the meaning of the superposition according to the CQC rule in a dynamic analysis??
- How is the automatic creation of c/t-parts carried out?
- When converting from the manual definition of reinforcement areas to the automatic arrangement of reinforcement according to Window 1.4, the result of the deformation calculation differs, although the basic reinforcement has not been modified. What is the reason for this change?
- I design a set of members by using the equivalent member method in RF‑/STEEL EC3, but the calculation fails. The system is unstable, delivering the message "Non-designable - ER055) Zero value of the critical moment on the segment."What could be the reason?
- Does the program check the lap length of the vertical stirrups of a block foundation with smooth bucket sides?
- Why do I get a discontinuous area in the distribution of internal forces? In the area of the supported line, the shear force VEd shows a jump, which does not seems to be plausible.
- Is there a possibility in RFEM to define a global polar grid whose origin lies, for example, in the global zero point and which applies to several surfaces?
- When comparing RF‑CONCRETE Columns with another design software, I get different results. How to explain the differences?
Programs Used for Structural Analysis
Structural engineering software for finite element analysis (FEA) of planar and spatial structural systems consisting of plates, walls, shells, members (beams), solids and contact elements
Design of reinforced concrete members and surfaces (plates, walls, planar structures, shells)
Stress analysis of steel surfaces and members
Dynamic analysis of natural frequencies and mode shapes of member, surface, and solid models
Stability analysis according to the eigenvalue method
Consideration of construction stages during a building phase