We provide hints and tips to help you get started with the basic program RFEM.
Home Support & Learning Learning Videos FAQ 004777 | Why does the deformation of a modeled single-span beam not correspond to the manual calculation?
FAQ 004777 | Why does the deformation of a modeled single-span beam not correspond to the manual calculation?
Video
First Steps with RFEM
Question
Why does the deformation of a modeled single-span beam not correspond to the manual calculation?Answer
The shear stiffness was probably not considered in the manual calculation or it was assumed as infinite. In RFEM/RSTAB, this is taken into account according to reality by default, so that the deformation is more unfavorable than in the manual calculation, which only includes the deformation component from bending.
The shear stiffness can be deactivated under the global calculation parameters (menu "Calculation" → "Calculation Parameters"), see the figure.
Keywords
Dlubal FAQ Deformation Manual calculation Deflection Frequently Asked Question FAQ about Dlubal Question and Answer about Dlubal
Links
Contact us
Do you have any questions about our products or need advice on selecting the products needed for your projects?
Contact us via our free e-mail, chat, or forum support or find various suggested solutions and useful tips on our FAQ page.
Recommended Events
Eurocode 5 | Timber structures according to EN 1995-1-1
Online Training 03/17/2021 8:30 AM - 12:30 PM CET
Eurocode 3 | Steel structures according to DIN EN 1993-1-1
Online Training 03/18/2021 8:30 AM - 12:30 PM CET
Eurocode 3 | Steel structures according to DIN EN 1993-1-1
Online Training 05/06/2021 8:30 AM - 12:30 PM
Eurocode 2 | Concrete structures according to DIN EN 1992-1-1
Online Training 05/11/2021 8:30 AM - 12:30 PM
Eurocode 5 | Timber structures according to DIN EN 1995-1-1
Online Training 05/20/2021 8:30 AM - 12:30 PM
RFEM | Structural dynamics and earthquake design according to EC 8
Online Training 06/02/2021 8:30 AM - 12:30 PM
Videos
Models to Download
Knowledge Base Articles

New
Manual adjustment of the buckling curve according to EN 1993-1-1
The RF-/STEEL EC3 add-on module automatically transfers the buckling line to be used for the flexural buckling analysis for a cross-section from the cross-section properties. In particular for general cross -sections, but also for special cases, the assignment of the buckling line can be adjusted manually in the module input.
Screenshots
Product Features Articles

New
Increased Calculation Performance by Reducing the Nodal Degrees of Freedom
The number of degrees of freedom in a node is no longer a global calculation parameter in RFEM (6 degrees of freedom for each mesh node in 3D models, 7 degrees of freedom for the warping torsion analysis). Thus, each node is generally considered with a different number of degrees of freedom, which leads to a variable number of equations in the calculation.
This modification speeds up the calculation, especially for models where a significant reduction of the system could be achieved (e.g. trusses and membrane structures).
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
- Does the load generation also work for curved members?
- I would like to calculate and design "temporary structures." What do I need for this?
- I often edit the reinforcement provided by the program. Adjusting the reinforcement by using coordinates takes much effort and time if having several beams in the model. Is there any way to speed up the reinforcement editing?
- I design timber components. The deformations of load combinations deviate from the manual calculation exactly by the factor of the material partial safety factor. Why?
- Which programs can I use to calculate and design power plants?
- Which filter settings should be selected in the material library for concrete in order to perform design in RF‑CONCRETE according to the Swedish National Annex? In RFEM, there is no Swedish standard group available for the selection.
- I have analyzed two models of an inclined bored pile as a support with defined spring stiffness. A surface that can be moved horizontally (globally) is used for the force transmission. The bored pile in Model A is a support inclined by 15° with a spring stiffness of 2,000 kN/m in the axial direction. The bored pile of Model B is a support with the defined spring stiffnesses, divided into the respective horizontal and vertical components. The value of the spring stiffness is always the same (2,000 kN/m). In my opinion, both models are equivalent. Why are there different results in the deformation anyway?
- What is the best way to consider steel fiber reinforced concrete with the structural analysis program RFEM?
- I design a cross-section created in the SHAPE‑THIN program by using the RF‑STEEL EC3 add-on module, but the program shows the error message "ER006 Invalid type of c/t-part for cross-section of type General." What can I do?
- How can I increase the maximum number of iterations in RFEM/RSTAB?
Customer Projects