This article was translated by Google Translator View original text

New

FAQ 003585 EN-US

09/13/2019

Gerhard Rehm Results RFEM RSTAB

I use member hinges with slippage in the longitudinal direction of the member. However, the calculation is always aborted because of an instability message. How can I optimize the system accordingly?

Answer

Especially the definition of slippage is a challenge for the solver due to the nonlinear calculation. In the following, hints are given how instabilities can be avoided.

load increments
When considering nonlinearities, it is often difficult to find an equilibrium. Instabilities can be avoided by applying the loading in several steps (see Figure 01). For example, if two load increments are specified, half of the load is applied in the first step. Iterations are carried out until the equilibrium is found. Then, in the second step, the complete load is applied to the already deformed system and iterations are run again until the state of equilibrium is reached. Please keep in mind that load increments have an unfavorable effect on the computing time. A value of 1 (no gradual load increment) is therefore preset in the text box. In addition, you can specify separately for each load case and load combination how many load increments you want to apply (see Figure 02). The global settings are then ignored.

Sliding definition
Slippage (eg in one connection) is defined by means of the "Partial Effect" nonlinearity (see Figure 03). It can be used to define the hinge displacement from which the forces should be transferred. As can be seen in the diagram, the stop, that is, the stiffness that acts according to the corresponding hinge displacement, is considered as rigid (vertical branch, see the red arrows). However, under certain circumstances, this may lead to numerical problems in the calculation. To avoid this, the stiffness that acts after the hinge displacement should be reduced slightly. This is achieved by defining a very stiff spring (see Figure 04).

In addition to the very stiff stop, numerical problems may occur within the slippage. In this case, a small stiffness has to be considered for the effect of the slippage in order to increase the horizontal branch a little bit. The stiffness should be selected so small that it has no decisive influence (see Figure 05). This situation is possible by using the "Diagram" nonlinearity.

Arrangement of Member Hinges
When arranging the hinges, care should be taken to ensure that they are not defined in the same direction on both member ends. Thus, there is a state in which the member is not sufficiently supported and the system fails already in the first iterations. In such a case, the slippage on only one side of the member should be defined and the size of the slippage adjusted accordingly (see Figure 06).

Keywords

Slippage displacement Instability

Downloads

Contact us

Contact Dlubal Software

Did you find your question?
If not, contact us via our free e-mail, chat, or forum support, or send us your question via the online form.

(267) 702-2815

info-us@dlubal.com

RFEM Main Program
RFEM 5.xx

Main Program

Structural engineering software for finite element analysis (FEA) of planar and spatial structural systems consisting of plates, walls, shells, members (beams), solids and contact elements

Price of First License
3,540.00 USD
RSTAB Main Program
RSTAB 8.xx

Main Program

The structural engineering software for design of frame, beam and truss structures, performing linear and nonlinear calculations of internal forces, deformations, and support reactions

Price of First License
2,550.00 USD