FAQ 004949 EN-US
Keywords
Rotational stiffness Stiffener Transverse stiffener Longitudinal stiffener Torsional buckling
Downloads
Write Comment...
Write Comment...
Contact us
Did you find your question?
If not, contact us via our free e-mail, chat, or forum support, or send us your question via the online form.
New
CSA S16:19 Stability Considerations and the New Annex O.2
Structure stability is not a new phenomenon when referring to steel design. The Canadian steel design standard CSA S16 and the most recent 2019 release is no exception.
SHAPE-THIN determines the effective cross-sections according to EN 1993-1-3 and EN 1993-1-5 for cold-formed sections. You can optionally check the geometric conditions for the applicability of the standard specified in EN 1993‑1‑3, Section 5.2.
The effects of local plate buckling are considered according to the method of reduced widths and the possible buckling of stiffeners (instability) is considered for stiffened sections according to EN 1993-1-3, Section 5.5.
As an option, you can perform an iterative calculation to optimize the effective cross-section.
You can display the effective cross-sections graphically.
Read more about designing cold-formed sections with SHAPE-THIN and RF-/STEEL Cold-Formed Sections in this technical article: Design of a Thin-Walled, Cold-Formed C-Section According to EN 1993-1-3.
- In PLATE‑BUCKLING, the reduction factor due to column buckling χc is calculated using the modified slenderness of the sheet metal ${\overline{\mathrm\lambda}}_{\mathrm p}$. Why is it not calculated using the slenderness of the equivalent compression member ${\overline{\mathrm\lambda}}_{\mathrm c}$ ?
-
Why are my steel members not being designed for stability in RF-STEEL AISC?
- My section is classified as Class 4 and non-designable in RF-/STEEL CSA. However, my manual calculation shows a different class. Why the difference?
- Can the properties, such as B. the cross -section or the surface thickness as well as the material of a surface of an existing element for a new element?
- I have defined temperature loads, strain loads, or a precamber. As soon as I modify stiffnesses, the deformations are no longer plausible.
- I am trying to manually check the deformations from the CRANEWAY add-on module. However, I obtain great deviations. How to explain the differences?
- What should be considered when using a failure of columns under tension in the RF‑/DYNAM Pro – Equivalent Loads add-on module?
- Why is there no stability analysis displayed in the results despite the activation of the stability analysis in RF‑/STEEL EC3?
- How can I model and design a crane runway girder with Dlubal Software?
- Is it possible to set user-defined values when viewing solid stress results?
Associated Products
PLATE-BUCKLING 8.xx - Stand-Alone
Stand-Alone Program
Plate buckling analysis of rectangular plates with or without stiffeners
900.00 USD
Add-on Module
Plate buckling analysis of rectangular plates with or without stiffeners
900.00 USD
Add-on Module
Plate buckling analysis of rectangular plates with or without stiffeners
900.00 USD
