Why does the eHORA map of Austria give different snow loads than your Geo-Zone tool?
Answer
The differences between our snow load map and the HORA web application result from the interval of the data used. Our application strictly refers to the current standard ÖNORM B 1991‑1‑3:2022‑05 with an interval of 0.5 kN / m².
The HORA map, on the other hand, uses an interval of 0.1 kN / m². Thus, the Dlubal Geo-Zone Tool outputs more conservative, strictly standard-compliant values.
The images show the difference for the same coordinates at an example location in Austria. The eHORA map is shown above; our Geo-zone tool is shown below.
Keywords
eHORA Geo zones ÖNORM B 1991-1-3:2022-05 Snow load map Characteristic snow load
Write Comment...
Write Comment...
Contact Us
Unable to find the answer to your question? Contact us via phone, email, chat, or forum, or send us your question directly through our online form.
Submit Individual Question
New
CSA S16:19 Stability Considerations and the New Annex O.2
The CSA S16:19 Stability Effects in Elastic Analysis method in Annex O.2 is an alternative option to the Simplified Stability Analysis Method in Clause 8.4.3. This article will describe the requirements of Annex O.2 and application in RFEM 6.
- How can I model a rib element in RFEM 6?
- The load distribution on my members looks different when using the Load Transfer surface vs. the Load Wizards. What is the reason?
- I received an error message “Surface of incompatible type... (Surface in upper plane of building story must be of ‘Load transfer’ type)” when running the calculation. What is the reason?
![Visualization of Sports Hall (© [pfitzner moorkens] architects)](/-/media/Images/website/img/030001-040000/033901-034000/033955.jpg?la=en-US&mw=250&mlid=C813851CC4FC4B02A0F981BCED7150E6&hash=92913AAD70DE3A9B8CD886E661993AC3FA0F86E0)
