In addition to our technical support (e.g. via chat), you’ll find resources on our website that may help you with your design using Dlubal Software.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Search FAQ
Further Information
Customer Support 24/7

Is there a possibility in RFEM to consider friction for the horizontal reactions of surface support?
Answer
For surface supports, this option is only available if a nonlinearity in the local z direction has also been defined (failure if contact stress in z is negative/positive). In the dialog box where you can edit the nonlinearity, there is the option 'Friction in plane xy'.
Figure 01  Definition of Nonlinearity 'Friction'
This option works as shown in the graphic dialog box: The support in x and y direction is only completely assumed when the contact stress Tau (contact stress Sigma by friction coefficient) is reached. It has to be reduced linearly before this.
In order to use this option, it is necessary to define a support in the horizontal directions. It can be defined as fixed or with an elastic spring. If the spring is defined with 0, no support is considered even when a friction coefficient is entered.

Answer
When defining nonlinearities, for example, failure of support under tension, it may happen that some load cases cannot be calculated. If these are loads that cannot exist without other stabilizing loads, solving the problem is simple: You can set the load cases to 'Not To Be Calculated'. As a result, only the load combinations are considered in the option 'Calculate All' of the calculation process. This is possible because, for example, some loads can never appear without having a selfweight.In the attached example, it is clearly evident that the system would buckle in the load case wind, and thus no convergence is found. In contrast to this, it is possible to calculate the load combination in which selfweight and wind are combined without a problem because the selfweight stabilizes the system. 
Answer
The difference between both material models is as follows:
In the Isotropic Nonlinear Elastic 1D material model, no plastic deformations are considered. This means that the material returns to its initial state when the load is released.
Whereas in the case of the material model Isotropic Plastic 1D, the plastic deformation is considered.
For both material models, the nonlinear properties are defined in an additional dialog box. When entering data by means of a diagram, it is possible to define a distribution in both models after the last step.
For the material model Isotropic Nonlinear Elastic 1D, it is possible to enter the stressstrain diagram (different for the positive and negative zone) in an antimetrical way, whereas for the model Isotropic Plastic 1D, only symmetric input is possible.

Answer
In this case, the Calculation Method and the type of the 2D position are important.When using the analytical method (RFCONCRETE Deflect), it is possible to perform a calculation in 2D positions. When using the nonlinear method (RFCONCRETE NL), the calculation for 2D XY (u_{Z}/φ_{X}/φ_{Y}) is not possible. In the nonlinear calculation, shrinkage is represented internally as strain load, which is not possible in this type of 2D position due to the limited degrees of freedom.Convert 2D to 3D PositionIn the general data, it is possible to simply convert a 2D position into a 3D position. For the supports, all degrees of freedom not contained in the 2D position are fixed when converting to a 3D position (see the video). 
Answer
Differences resulting from the determination of the deformation in the cracked state can have different causes. The following points should be checked for deviations:
Is the same calculation method applied?
RFCONCRETE Deflect uses an analytical analysis approach according to EN 199211 7.4.3.RFCONCRETE NL uses a physically nonlinear analysis approach.More detailed information about the calculation methods can be found, for example, in the RFCONCRETE Surfaces Guide in Chapter 2.7 and 2.8.
Is the same initial structure available?
The results of the linear calculation provide the best tool for consideration if the underlying system should be taken for equivalent. The linearly determined deformation of the underlying combination should be approximately equal. Any possible differences in the linear deformation may be increased in the cracked state in connection with the deformation analysis.
Are the same effects taken into account?
When performing a comparison, make sure that the same effects as for example creep and shrinkage are taken into account (Figure 02).
Are the same input values available?
Furthermore, it should be checked in connection with the deformation analysis if the same input values are available. In this case, it is necessary to pay particular attention to whether the applied reinforcement (Figure 03) and the lever arm or concrete cover are the same.
If not having found the cause after the fundamental examination, please contact our hot line. 
Answer
The load from the formfinding load case (FF) is impressed 1.0fold into the system. If you want to factorize the deadload in combination with combinatorics, it is possible to additionally create a permanent load case for the deadload with a load of 0.35 times the load. 
Answer
If nodal supports are modeled on supported lines, this may lead to problems and incorrect definitions. Therefore, the following warning message appears in the plausibility check.Internally, line supports and nodal supports are treated on each FE node. If a nodal support is located on a line support, an FE node thus receives several support definitions. If the defined directions of the supports do not match, this is not critical and the warning message can be ignored. If the same directions are defined several times, contradictions may occur.In case of line support which is failing on the tension and nodal support on this line, the tension force thus results in the FE node which however counts to the line support and to the nodal support.To avoid this behavior, it is possible to insert a short line without support definition in the area of each nodal support. It may also be useful to model the tension bracket using a newly defined member. The force transmission can then be adjusted by means of the support of the member, the member type itself, and the member end release.In general, the support stiffenings should be estimated realistically; in the example, rigid supports were assumed as a simplification. 
Answer
When using the automatic arrangement of the reinforcement, make sure that, in addition to the basic reinforcement, additional reinforcement is applied, if applicable, for the serviceability limit state designs. The default setting in the addon module is such that the required reinforcement from the ultimate limit state is also applied for the SLS.
You can select the reinforcement that is applied for the SLS in 'Additional Reinforcement for Serviceability State Design'. The Info button explains the individual options (Figure 02).
The reinforcement applied for the designs can be reproduced via the function 'Selected Reinforcement for SLS Check' (Figure 03).

Answer
The differences between the two modules are explained in this FAQ .
In general, you should also calculate the same results for both addon modules if the settings are identical. However, this does not apply to existing nonlinearities. This is because no nonlinearities are considered in the RF/DYNAM Pro addon module. If the results are output via the Forced Vibrations addon module, all nonlinearities are ignored. In contrast to this, the equivalent loads are calculated on a linear system, but the exported load cases are then calculated on the real system, that is, with all nonlinearities in RFEM or RSTAB . This may lead to inconsistent results.
If you deactivate the nonlinearities for the exported load cases, they should have identical results.
The way of considering nonlinearities in the response spectrum analysis is described using the tension members in this FAQ.

Answer
The material model according to TsaiWu unifies plastic with orthotropic properties. This way, you can enter special modelings of materials with anisotropic characteristics such as plastics or timber. When the material is plasticized, stresses remain constant. A redistribution is carried out according to the stiffnesses available in the individual directions. The elastic zone corresponds to the material model Orthotropic  3D. For the plastic zone, the yielding according to TsaiWu applies:${\text{f}}_{\mathrm{crit}}\left(\mathrm\delta\right)=\frac1{\mathrm C}\left[\frac{\left({\mathrm\delta}_{\mathrm x}{\mathrm\delta}_{\mathrm x,0}\right)^2}{{\mathrm f}_{\mathrm t,\mathrm x}{\mathrm f}_{\mathrm c,\mathrm x}}+\frac{\left({\mathrm\delta}_{\mathrm y}{\mathrm\delta}_{\mathrm y,0}\right)^2}{{\mathrm f}_{\mathrm t,\mathrm y}{\mathrm f}_{\mathrm c,\mathrm y}}+\frac{\left({\mathrm\delta}_{\mathrm z}{\mathrm\delta}_{\mathrm z,0}\right)^2}{{\mathrm f}_{\mathrm t,\mathrm z}{\mathrm f}_{\mathrm c,\mathrm z}}+\frac{{\mathrm\tau}_{\mathrm{yz}}^2}{{\mathrm f}_{\mathrm v,\mathrm{yz}}^2}+\frac{{\mathrm\tau}_{\mathrm{xz}}^2}{{\mathrm f}_{\mathrm v,\mathrm{xz}}^2}+\frac{{\mathrm\tau}_{\mathrm{xy}}^2}{{\mathrm f}_{\mathrm v,\mathrm{xy}}^2}\right]$with:${\mathrm\delta}_{\mathrm x,0}=\frac{{\mathrm f}_{\mathrm t,\mathrm x}{\mathrm f}_{\mathrm c,\mathrm x}}2$${\mathrm\delta}_{\mathrm y,0}=\frac{{\mathrm f}_{\mathrm t,\mathrm y}{\mathrm f}_{\mathrm c,\mathrm y}}2$${\mathrm\delta}_{\mathrm z,0}=\frac{{\mathrm f}_{\mathrm t,\mathrm z}{\mathrm f}_{\mathrm c,\mathrm z}}2$$\mathrm C=1+\left[\frac1{{\mathrm f}_{\mathrm t,\mathrm x}}+\frac1{{\mathrm f}_{\mathrm c,\mathrm x}}\right]^2\frac{{\mathrm E}_{\mathrm x}{\mathrm E}_{\mathrm p,\mathrm x}}{{\mathrm E}_{\mathrm x}{\mathrm E}_{\mathrm p,\mathrm x}}\mathrm\alpha+\frac{{\mathrm\delta}_{\mathrm x,0}^2}{{\mathrm f}_{\mathrm t,\mathrm x}{\mathrm f}_{\mathrm c,\mathrm x}}+\frac{{\mathrm\delta}_{\mathrm y,0}^2}{{\mathrm f}_{\mathrm t,\mathrm y}{\mathrm f}_{\mathrm c,\mathrm y}}+\frac{{\mathrm\delta}_{\mathrm z,0}^2}{{\mathrm f}_{\mathrm t,\mathrm z}{\mathrm f}_{\mathrm c,\mathrm y}}$The yielding condition can be thought of as an elliptical surface in a sixdimensional space of tension.If one of the three stress components is applied as a constant value, the surface can be projected onto a threedimensional stress space. Projection of yielding surfaces for normal stresses according to TsaiWu If the value for fy (σ) is smaller than 1, the stresses lie within the elastic range. The plastic zone is reached as soon as fy (σ) = 1; values greater than 1 are not allowed. The model behavior is idealplastic, which means no stiffening takes place.
Contact us
Did you find your question?
If not, contact us via our free email, chat, or forum support, or send us your question via the online form.
First Steps
We provide hints and tips to help you get started with the main programs RFEM and RSTAB.
Wind Simulation & Wind Load Generation
With the standalone program RWIND Simulation, wind flows around simple or complex structures can be simulated by means of a digital wind tunnel.
The generated wind loads acting on these objects can be imported to RFEM or RSTAB.
Your support is by far the best
“Thank you very much for the useful information.
I would like to pay a compliment to your support team. I am always impressed how quickly and professionally the questions are answered. In the industry of structural analysis, I use several software including service contract, but your support is by far the best.”