National Annexes for Eurocode 2 in SHAPE-MASSIVE
The number of National Annexes for Eurocode 2 with regard to the design of reinforced concrete cross-sections has been extended since SHAPE-MASSIVE 6.54. Therefore, the following NAs of EN 1992‑1‑1:2004 + AC:2010 are available.
- DIN EN 1992-1-1/NA:2015-12 (Germany)
- NEN-EN 1992-1-1+C2:2011/NB:2016 (Netherlands)
- CSN EN 1992-1-1/NA:2016-05 (Czech Republic)
- ÖNORM B 1992-1-1:2011-12 (Austria)
- UNE EN 1992-1-1/NA:2013 (Spain)
- EN 1992-1-1 DK NA:2013 (Denmark)
- SIST EN 1992-1-1:2005/A101:2006 (Slovenia)
- NF EN 1992-1-1/NA:2016-03 (France)
- STN EN 1992-1-1/NA:2008-06 (Slovakia)
- SFS EN 1992-1-1/NA:2007-10 (Finland)
- NA to BS EN 1992-1-1:2004 (United Kingdom)
- SS EN 1992-1-1/NA:2008-06 (Singapore)
- NP EN 1992-1-1/NA:2010-02 (Portugal)
- UNI EN 1992-1-1/NA:2007-07 (Italy)
- SS EN 1992-1-1/NA:2008 (Sweden)
- PN EN 1992-1-1/NA:2010 (Poland)
- NBN EN 1992-1-1 ANB:2010 for proof at normal temperature (Belgium)
- NA to CYS EN 1992-1-1:2004/NA:2009 (Cyprus)
- BDS EN 1992-1-1:2005/NA:2011 (Bulgaria)
- LST EN 1992-1-1:2005/NA:2011 (Lithuania)
- SR EN 1992-1-1:2004/NA:2008 (Romania)
Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Alexander Meierhofer
Head of Product Engineering Concrete & Customer Support
Do you have questions or need advice?
Contact our free e-mail, chat, or forum support or find various suggested solutions and useful tips on our FAQ page.
This article deals with rectilinear elements of which the cross-section is subjected to axial compressive force. The purpose of this article is to show how very many parameters defined in the Eurocodes for concrete column calculation are considered in the RFEM structural analysis software.
- I have a roof structure resting on a steel column that runs to the foundations. The column runs through a perimeter wall that supports the false ceiling. A considerable part of the load from the roof is transferred to the wall. I want the steel column to carry all the vertical loads from the roof. How can I do it?
- Are the models and presentations from Info Day 2018 freely available, and can you send them to me?
- In RF‑CONCRETE Surfaces, I obtain a high amount of reinforcement in relation to a lever arm that is almost zero. How is such a small lever arm of internal forces created?
- What is the meaning of the superposition according to the CQC rule in a dynamic analysis??
- When converting from the manual definition of reinforcement areas to the automatic arrangement of reinforcement according to Window 1.4, the result of the deformation calculation differs, although the basic reinforcement has not been modified. What is the reason for this change?
- Does the program check the lap length of the vertical stirrups of a block foundation with smooth bucket sides?
- Why do I get a discontinuous area in the distribution of internal forces? In the area of the supported line, the shear force VEd shows a jump, which does not seems to be plausible.
- Is there a possibility in RFEM to define a global polar grid with the origin lies in the global zero point, for example, and which applies to several surfaces?
- When comparing RF‑CONCRETE Columns with another design software, I get different results. How to explain the differences?
- Is it possible to perform design without an additional reinforcement in RF‑CONCRETE Surfaces?