Design of Concrete Columns Subjected to Axial Compression with RFCONCRETE Columns
Technical Article
This article compares the design with the one in the following article: Design of Concrete Columns Subjected to Axial Compression with RFCONCRETE Members. It is therefore about taking exactly the same theoretical application carried out in RFCONCRETE Members and reproducing it in RFCONCRETE Columns. Thus, the objective is to compare the different input parameters and the results obtained by the two addon modules for the design of columnlike concrete members.
Theoretical Application
Axial compression applies if it is assumed that second order effects (imperfections, asymmetry, etc.) can be neglected while respecting in particular the slenderness criterion which depends on various parameters (slenderness coefficient, limiting slenderness, effective length).
Then, under the single loading of a normal force N_{ed}, the force that can be balanced by the concrete crosssection corresponds to its maximum loadbearing capacity for compression, which directly depends on its section and its design resistance. The reinforcement will balance the rest of the axial compressive load.
Application of Theory with RFCONCRETE Columns addon module
In this article, we will analyze the results obtained automatically for the reinforcement calculation.
The parameters remain the same and are listed below:
 Permanent loads: N_{g} = 1 390 kN
 Variable loads: N_{q} = 1 000 kN
 Column length: l = 2.1 m
 Rectangular crosssection: width b = 40 cm / height h = 45 cm
 The column's selfweight can be ignored.
 Column not integrated into bracing.
 Concrete strength class: C25/30
 Steel: S 500 A for inclined graph
 Diameter of longitudinal reinforcement: ϕ = 20 mm
 Diameter of transverse reinforcement: ϕt = 8 mm
 Concrete cover: 3 cm
Real CrossSection to be Calculated
Since it is not possible in RFCONCRETE Columns to optimize the crosssection height, the section's real height h is directly modified and set to 45 cm.
Image 02 shows the steps to change the height of the rectangular crosssection in RFCONCRETE Columns.
Material Properties
The formulas for the materials' strength and strain are described in detail in the technical article mentioned above.
Total area of pure concrete section
A_{c} = b ⋅ h = 0.40 ⋅ 0.45 = 0.18 m²
Design value for compressive strength of concrete
f_{cd} = 16.7 MPa
Relative compression strain for maximum stress
ε_{c2} = 2 ‰
Design yield strength of reinforcing steel
f_{yd}= 435 MPa
Limit strain in reinforcement
ε_{ud} = 2.17 ‰
Stress in reinforcement
σ_{s} = 400 MPa
In order to verify the material settings in RFCONCRETE Columns, Image 03 shows the expected stresses and strains for the concrete and the required reinforcement.
Ultimate Limit State
Ultimate limit state design loads
N_{Ed} = 1.35 ⋅ N_{g} + 1.5 ⋅ N_{q}
N_{Ed} = 1.35 ⋅ 1390 + 1.5 ⋅ 1000 = 3.38 MN
N_{Ed} ... design value of acting axial force
Second Order Effects not Taken into Account in ULS
As the model is identical for this article and the one which serves as a basis for comparison, we have modeled the same column restrained at the base and free at the head to be able to apply the load correctly at the column head. However, we consider that the column is still fixed at the head to some beams, and for this we have applied an effective length factor to the column which allows for modifying the column's slenderness value.
Effective length factor according to EN 199211  5.8.3.2 (3)  Formula 5.15
k_{cr} = 0.59
Slenderness according to EN 199211  5.8.3.2 (1)  Formula 5.14
λ_{z} = 10.73 m
Limiting slenderness according to EN 199211  5.8.3.1 (1)  Formula 5.13N
n = 1.125
λ_{lim} = 20 ⋅ 07. ⋅ 1.1 ⋅ 0.7 / √1.125 = 10.16 m
λ_{z} > λ_{lim} → The condition is not fulfilled.
However, we are still going to calculate the column with regard to simple compression because the difference being small, we see below that with the mechanical reinforcement ratio the condition will be respected. For this, Image 05 describes how to deactivate the possibility of having buckling about each axis of the crosssection in RFCONCRETE Columns.
LoadBearing CrossSection
Equilibrium force of concrete
F_{c} = A_{c} ⋅ f_{cd} = 0.40 ⋅ 0.45 ⋅ 16.7 = 3 MN
Equilibrium force of reinforcement
F_{s} = N_{Ed}  F_{c} = 3.38  3 = 0.38 MN
We deduce the corresponding reinforcement area:
Reinforcement area
A_{s} = F_{s} / σ_{s} = 0.38 / 400 ⋅ 10^{4} = 9.5 cm²
By having set the reinforcing steels for a diameter of 20 mm in RFCONCRETE Columns, the provided reinforcement determined automatically by the addon module is 4 members, with a distribution in the corners as requested, i.e. 1 HA 20 per corner, which results in the following reinforcement area:
A_{s} = 4 ⋅ 3.142 = 12.57 cm²
Mechanical reinforcement ratio
ω = (A_{s} ⋅ f_{yd}) / (A_{c} ⋅ f_{cd}) = 0.182
Final check of limiting slenderness
λ_{lim} = (20 ⋅ 0.7 ⋅ √(1 + 2 ⋅ 0.182) ⋅ 0.7) / √1.125 = 10.79 m
λ_{z} < λ_{lim} → The slenderness criterion is fulfilled.
Author
M.Eng. Milan Gérard
Sales & Technical Support
Milan Gérard works at the Paris site. He is responsible for sales and provides technical support to our Frenchspeaking customers.
Keywords
Eurocodes Compression Reinforcement Slenderness
Reference
Links
Write Comment...
Write Comment...
Contact us
Do you have questions or need advice?
Contact our free email, chat, or forum support or find various suggested solutions and useful tips on our FAQ page.
New
Definition of the minimum longitudinal reinforcement for reinforced concrete columns
In RF/CONCRETE Columns, different methods are available for defining the minimum longitudinal reinforcement.
Material Model Orthotropic Masonry 2D
The material model Orthotropic Masonry 2D is an elastoplastic model that additionally allows softening of the material, which can be different in the local x and ydirection of a surface. The material model is suitable for (unreinforced) masonry walls with inplane loads.
 When comparing RF‑CONCRETE Columns with another design software, I get different results. How to explain the differences?

The design criterion for VEd/VRd,c is displayed as governing, although there should be a shear reinforcement designed. Also, the design of VEd/VRds is missing. Why is that?
 Which calculation method is the basis for the stability analysis in RF‑CONCRETE Columns?
 Is it possible to enter a curtailed reinforcement in RF‑CONCRETE Columns?
 Why are the values of a column base, head or center on the individual columns only displayed partially for the results from the calculation in RF‑CONCRETE Columns?
 Can I enter a provided basic reinforcement in RF‑CONCRETE Columns?
 Can I design a reinforced concrete structure according to ÖNORM in RFEM?
 Can I use RF‑CONCRETE Surfaces to determine the steel mass for the inserted reinforcement?
 When opening an RFEM file, the entries in RF‑CONCRETE Surfaces are lost. Is it possible?
 Is it possible to adjust the initial values of the temperature courses entered for the fire resistance design? For example, I would like to adjust the initial value of the moisture content.
Associated Products