RF-CONCRETE Surfaces Version 5

Online manuals, introductory examples, tutorials, and other documentation.

RF-CONCRETE Surfaces Version 5

Switch to Fullscreen Mode Exit Fullscreen Mode

2.3.2 Two-Directional Reinforcement Meshes with k > 0

Two-Directional Reinforcement Meshes with k > 0

For a reinforcement with two reinforcement directions subjected to two positive principal axial forces N1 und N2, we select the direction of the concrete compressive strut as follows.

γ = α + β2 

Basically, there are two possibilities for arranging a compression strut exactly at the center between two crossing reinforcement directions.

Figure 2.13 Correct and incorrect arrangement of the stiffening concrete compression strut

In the figure on the left, the stiffening concrete compression strut divides the obtuse angle between the crossing reinforcement directions; in the figure on the right, it divides the acute angle. The strut on the left stiffens the reinforcement mesh in the desired way, whereas the concrete compression strut shown in the figure on the right shows that the reinforcement mesh can be deformed arbitrarily by the force N1.

To ensure that the compression strut divides the correct angle, the design forces Zx, Zy, and Zz are determined using Equation 2.5, Equation 2.6, and Equation 2.7 for both geometrically possible directions of the compression strut. A wrong direction of the compression strut would result in a tensile force.

Therefore, the following directions of the concrete compression strut are analyzed:

γ1a = α + β2      und    γ1b = α + β2 + 90° 

To distinguish the analyzed directions, the index "1a" is assigned to the simple arithmetic mean value and the index "1b" is assigned to the direction of the compression strut rotated by 90°.

The following graph shows that, for the equilibrium of forces, we obtain a tension force in the two reinforcement directions and a compression force in the selected direction of the compression strut.

Figure 2.14 Two-directional reinforcement in pure tension

In his studies, Baumann [1] assumed certain ranges of values for the different angles. For example, the angle α (between the principal axial force N1 and the reinforcement direction closest to it) is to be between 0 and π/4. The angle β must be greater than α + π/2.

[1] provides Table IV with the possible states of equilibrium (see Figure 2.15). The rows 1 through 4 of this table show the possible states of equilibrium for walls that are subjected to tension alone. Row 4 shows the state of equilibrium with two directions of reinforcement subjected to tension and a compression strut. The rows 5 to 7 show walls for which the principal axial forces have different algebraic signs.

Figure 2.15 Possible states of equilibrium according to

The second column of this table defines the value range of the loading.

The third column indicates the number of reinforcement directions that will be subjected to a tension force.

The fourth column (β) shows the value range of the reinforcement direction β. In RF-CONCRETE Surfaces, this range is not available as it results from the directions of reinforcement specified in the input data.

The fifth column (γ) shows the direction of the internal force Zz. In most cases, this is the direction of the compression strut computed by the program. However, it can also be a user-defined third reinforcement direction to which a tension force is actually assigned.

The seventh row indicates whether or not γ is indeed a compression force.

The penultimate column shows the required internal forces together with their directions. Here, the reinforcement directions with a tension force are represented by simple lines. The possible compression struts are indicated by dashed lines.

Literatur
[1] Deutscher Ausschuss für Stahlbeton, Heft 217: Tragwirkung orthogonaler Bewehrungsnetze beliebiger Richtung in Flächentragwerken aus Stahlbeton (von Theodor Baumann). Verlag Ernst & Sohn, Berlin, 1972.