In addition to our technical support (e.g. via chat), you’ll find resources on our website that may help you with your design using Dlubal Software.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Customer Support 24/7
AnswerIn RF-/JOINTS Steel - Rigid, the design is implemented according to EN 1993‑1‑8, Section 6.2.7, Equation 6.24. If the design axial force exceeds 5% of the plastic resistance Npl, Rd, Equation 6.24 applies.
AnswerThe design of a rigid connection of this type without a web stiffener or an end plate is only possible with the JOINTS Steel - Rigid add-on module. You can find an example under Downloads below.
AnswerThe option to enter a taper on a beam can be activated in the Arrangement section of Window 1.4 Geometry. Here you can model the taper on the bottom or top side of the beam.The plate thicknesses as well as the height of the taper are defined by selecting the cross-section of the taper, since the cut rolled cross-sections are often used, for example. If user-defined plates are used, you can select a parametric T‑section. The length of the taper as well as the material are entered in the same section. The weld thicknesses for connecting the taper to the beam can be defined in the Welds section.If there is a tapered member already used as a beam (entered in the "Nodes and Members" section by specifying different cross-sections and lengths), it is not possible to model an additional taper.
AnswerThe RF-/JOINTS add-on module is divided into several joint groups. For this, see the following FAQ.Therefore, there is no straightforward answer to the special aspects of the design as in this FAQ.In contrast to the RF‑/TIMBER Pro add-on module described in the mentioned FAQ, however, it is obvious that the RF‑/JOINTS add-on modules cannot design EC2, even if manually changing the LDC, for example in the RF‑/JOINTS Timber - Steel to Timber add-on module (see Figure 01).Furthermore, this also applies to the add‑on modules RF‑GLASS and RF‑/CONCRETE NL.The reason for this is that there are stiffnesses exported in the program in the case of some joint groups of the RF‑/JOINTS add‑on module. For nonlinear calculations, the superposition with result combinations is not allowed. In the case of the second result combination mentioned above, there is the special feature that the superposition is no longer conservative, even in the case of simple structures. The design cannot be also performed correctly by manually changing the LDC.Nevertheless, if a result combination should be superimposed with constant and alternative additive, it is necessary to split EC2 in the attached file into load combinations as follows.
- RC2*=CO1 or CO2
AnswerIn addition to geometry input errors, this discrepancy is usually caused by a different calculation basis of both add-on modules.The design of an end plate joint with the RF‑/JOINTS Steel - DSTV add-on module is carried out by comparing the saved ultimate limit states with the design internal forces. The underlying resistances are taken from the current DSTV guidelines.When using the RF‑/JOINTS Steel - Rigid add-on module, the joint resistances of are calculated according to DIN EN 1993‑1‑8 by means of the component method. Thus, you can directly affect the results via the settings you have made.In this case, an elastic distribution of bolt forces is used as a basis by default. By selecting the plastic force distribution in the joint, you can activate additional load capacities. These are already included in the ultimate limit states according to the DSTV guidelines.In order to obtain the comparable results between both add-on modules, it is necessary to apply the plastic force distribution for the calculation. Furthermore, you should pay attention to the correct modeling of the joint geometry.
The geometry depends on the definition of the structural components. In Window "1.2 Nodes and Members," there is the specification of which member is calculated as a column and which one as a beam. The program always recognizes the column as a continuous structural component by default (see Figure 01).In order to make the beam continuous, simply change the status of the individual members (see Figure 02). The actual beam will have the "Column" status and the actual column will be defined as a "Beam."
Designs in our module RF-/JOINTS Steel - Rigid are based on the assumptions and regulations of the standard EN 1993‑1‑8. Here, bending from the main beam plane is not considered.
In RFEM, it is possible to model any rigid joint. All internal forces can then be taken into account.
RF-JOINTS performs an idealized design of a steel connection according to the standard, which cannot be easily compared with an exact FE calculation.
Thus, the following conditions must be met:
- Consideration or exclusion of friction/compression/tension within the contact solid (tab 'Solid') as well as for the bolts modelled subsequently
- Consideration of internal forces and deformations within the subsequently modelled end plates or similar, which causes redistribution of bolt forces in the FE calculation (in contrast to the idealized design in RF‑JOINTS)
This can be corrected by rigid connection objects, for example (an end plate as a rigid surface).
- Uniform load introduction into the FE model, for example, by using rigid members or rigid surfaces as described in the article 'FEM Modeling Approaches of Rigid Connections'
In the RF‑/JOINTS add-on module, you can export result graphics as DXF files. The corresponding button is below the graphic in Window 4.1 (see Figure 01).
After you click the button, the Windows dialog box "Save as" appears where you can enter the name and the file path of the DXF file.
Did you find your question?
If not, contact us via our free e-mail, chat, or forum support, or send us your question via the online form.
Wind Simulation & Wind Load Generation
With the stand-alone program RWIND Simulation, wind flows around simple or complex structures can be simulated by means of a digital wind tunnel.
The generated wind loads acting on these objects can be imported to RFEM or RSTAB.
“Thank you for the valuable information.
I would like to pay a compliment to your support team. I am always impressed how quickly and professionally the questions are answered. I have used a lot of software with a support contract in the field of structural analysis, but your support is by far the best. ”