1107x
004985
2021-04-21

CSA S16 4类

My 截面被归类为第 4 类,不可在 RF-/STEEL CSA 中设计。 However, my manual calculation shows a different class. Why the difference?


回复:

最大比 b/t 和 h/w 根据杆件的内力在表 1 或表 2 的基础上计算得出。 For members subject to pure axial compression, Table 1 is used. For members subject to flexure or flexure+axial (beam-column), Table 2 is used.

In RFEM, the preset setting is to neglect the bending moment if the ratio is less than 1%. Therefore, the program shows “Class 4” since the check is based on Table 1.

To change this setting, go to Details and set the limit values to zero (as shown in Image 1). By doing so, the program runs the check per Table 2 and no longer ignore the small moments.

Note: In the example model, where moments are zero at the support locations, the result is still shown as “Class 4 (non-designable)”.

ZH | 国旗 常见问题和解答 (FAQ)
CSA S16 4类

作者

Cisca 负责北美市场的客户技术支持和持续的程序开发。



;