We provide hints and tips to help you get started with the basic program RFEM.
Home Support & Learning Learning Videos FAQ 004856 | How is the buckling load determined in RSBUCK if the most unfavorable value is transferred from RSTAB for a non-constant axial force distribution?
FAQ 004856 | How is the buckling load determined in RSBUCK if the most unfavorable value is transferred from RSTAB for a non-constant axial force distribution?
Video
First Steps with RFEM
Question
How is the buckling load determined in RSBUCK if the most unfavorable value is transferred from RSTAB for a non-constant axial force distribution?Answer
Basically, the buckling load is determined as follows when activating the option to transfer the most unfavorable value of the axial force for a non-constant distribution:
Critical load factor * most unfavorable value of the axial force = buckling load
However, the most unfavorable value refers to the member part, not to the entire member. The value of the most unfavorable axial force of the entire member is only assumed as the most unfavorable value if "1" is selected for "Internal Member Partition for", see Image 01.
Image 01 - Options and Internal Member Partition in RSBUCK
Otherwise, the mean value is first determined internally from the most unfavorable values of the respective member partitions. The following diagram shows the most unfavorable value for two member parts from the axial force distribution in the following image:
(60 kN + 30 kN) / 2 = 45 kN
Image 02 - Example: Non-Constant Axial Force Distribution Within Member
Thus, the following buckling load results for the first buckling mode in this example:
2.429 * 45 kN = 109.3 kN
Keywords
Dlubal FAQ Buckling load Critical load Most unfavorable Value Frequently Asked Question FAQ about Dlubal Question and Answer about Dlubal
Links
Contact us
Do you have any questions about our products or need advice on selecting the products needed for your projects?
Contact us via our free e-mail, chat, or forum support or find various suggested solutions and useful tips on our FAQ page.
Recommended Events
Eurocode 3 | Steel structures according to DIN EN 1993-1-1
Online Training 03/18/2021 8:30 AM - 12:30 PM CET
Eurocode 3 | Steel structures according to DIN EN 1993-1-1
Online Training 05/06/2021 8:30 AM - 12:30 PM
Membrane Structures with Wind Loads from CFD Wind Simulation
Webinar 03/24/2020 3:00 PM - 4:15 PM CET
Videos
Models to Download
Knowledge Base Articles

Screenshots
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
- How is the buckling load determined in RSBUCK if the most unfavorable value is transferred from RSTAB for a non-constant axial force distribution?
- How does RF‑STABILITY or RSBUCK determine the buckling load? According to the manual calculation, the respective buckling loads should be about 10% higher.
- Why is it not possible to use result combinations in RF‑STABILITY? It is possible in RSBUCK indeed.
- Is it possible to import effective lengths from RF‑STABILITY or RSBUCK in RF‑/TIMBER Pro?
- What is the critical load factor and how is it possible to determine it?
- Why do I get large differences for the design of a longitudinally stiffened buckling panel in comparison with the German and Austrian National Annex?
- How can I create a curved or arched section?
- How can I perform the stability analysis in RF‑/STEEL EC3 for a flat bar supported on edges, such as 100/5? Although the cross-section is rotated by 90° in RFEM/RSTAB, it is displayed as lying flat in RF‑/STEEL EC3.
- Why are my imperfections displayed graphically in different ways and can I adjust the display?
- Is it possible to manually specify a longitudinal reinforcement for design in RF‑PUNCH Pro?
Customer Projects