We provide hints and tips to help you get started with the basic program RFEM.
Home Support & Learning Learning Videos FAQ 003539 | Why do RF‑CONCRETE Members or CONCRETE determine a significantly higher provided reinforcement than the required reinforcement?
FAQ 003539 | Why do RF‑CONCRETE Members or CONCRETE determine a significantly higher provided reinforcement than the required reinforcement?
Video
First Steps with RFEM
08/30/2019
000522
Question
Why do RF‑CONCRETE Members or CONCRETE determine a significantly higher provided reinforcement than the required reinforcement?Answer
The curtailment of the reinforcement can be activated in the "Longitudinal Reinforcement" tab of the add-on module (Figure 02).
After activating the curtailment, it is possible to define the number of areas. The higher is the number of areas, the more precisely can the provided reinforcement follow the distribution of the required reinforcement (Figure 03).
Keywords
Dlubal FAQ Required reinforcement Provided reinforcement Difference Curtailment Frequently Asked Question FAQ about Dlubal Question and Answer about Dlubal
Links
Contact us
Do you have any questions about our products or need advice on selecting the products needed for your projects?
Contact us via our free e-mail, chat, or forum support or find various suggested solutions and useful tips on our FAQ page.
Recommended Events
Eurocode 5 | Timber structures according to EN 1995-1-1
Online Training 03/17/2021 8:30 AM - 12:30 PM CET
Eurocode 3 | Steel structures according to DIN EN 1993-1-1
Online Training 03/18/2021 8:30 AM - 12:30 PM CET
Eurocode 3 | Steel structures according to DIN EN 1993-1-1
Online Training 05/06/2021 8:30 AM - 12:30 PM
Eurocode 2 | Concrete structures according to DIN EN 1992-1-1
Online Training 05/11/2021 8:30 AM - 12:30 PM
Eurocode 5 | Timber structures according to DIN EN 1995-1-1
Online Training 05/20/2021 8:30 AM - 12:30 PM
RFEM | Structural dynamics and earthquake design according to EC 8
Online Training 06/02/2021 8:30 AM - 12:30 PM
Videos
KB000610 | Automatically Dimensioning the Foundation Slab Geometry with RF-/FOUNDATION Pro
Length 0:40 min
KB 000674 | Defining Mandrel Diameter for Foundation Reinforcement in RF-/FOUNDATION Pro
Length 0:36 min
KB 000605 | Setting the Concrete Cover in RF-/FOUNDATION Pro According to EN 1992-1-1
Length 0:32 min
Models to Download
Knowledge Base Articles
New
RF-CONCRETE Members for RFEM or CONCRETE for RSTAB propose an automatically created reinforcement to the user, if the ‘Design the provided reinforcement’ option is selected in Window 1.6 ‘Reinforcement’.Screenshots
Product Features Articles

Material Model Orthotropic Masonry 2D
The material model Orthotropic Masonry 2D is an elastoplastic model that additionally allows softening of the material, which can be different in the local x- and y-direction of a surface. The material model is suitable for (unreinforced) masonry walls with in-plane loads.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
- When calculating deformations in RF‑CONCRETE Members, I get jumps in the deformation diagram. Why?
- In connection with the analytical SLS calculation, I get implausibly large values for the crack width and deformation in the RF‑CONCRETE add-on modules. What is the cause and how can I fix the problem?
- Is it possible to take a user-defined national annex as a basis for concrete design?
- Is it possible to adjust the initial values of the temperature courses entered for the fire resistance design? For example, I would like to adjust the initial value of the moisture content.
- Regarding a nonlinear analysis of reinforced concrete, is there any feature in the program that increases the load until failure? Or is there any way how to describe the load increment until failure?
- Is it possible to use high-strength reinforcement or high-strength reinforcing steel in the RF‑CONCRETE add-on modules?
- Why is there only displayed the total reinforcement in the Results navigator under "Required Reinforcement", and not the top and bottom reinforcement separately?
- The module RF-CONCRETE Members is calculating a very high required reinforcement to fulfil the requirements of the SLS checks. Is there any way to avoid such high values for required reinforcement?
- I obtain different results when comparing the deformation analysis in the RF‑CONCRETE add-on modules and another calculation program. What could be the reason for this?
- Why do RF‑CONCRETE Members or CONCRETE determine a significantly higher provided reinforcement than the required reinforcement?
Customer Projects