Differences Between the Analytical and Nonlinear Deformation Analysis of Reinforced Concrete
Different methods are available for calculating the deformation in the cracked state. RFEM provides an analytical method according to DIN EN 1992-1-1 7.4.3 and a physical-nonlinear analysis. Both methods have different features and can be more or less suitable depending on the circumstances. This article will give an overview of the two calculation methods.
Analytical Calculation Method
RF-CONCRETE Deflect provides the analytical calculation method according to DIN EN1992-1-1  7.4.3. This means that the cracking or contribution of the concrete in the tension zone is determined by means of the distribution coefficient ζ. The structural system can be between state I (uncracked, ζ = 0) and state II (cracked, ζ = 1). In RF-CONCRETE Deflect, a mean stiffness is finally determined with ζ. Based on these values, the deformation is recalculated. Due to the stiffness change, however, no recalculation of the distribution of internal forces will be performed. The method is thus non-iterative. You can find more detailed information about RF-CONCRETE Deflect in Chapter 2.7 of the RF-CONCRETE Surfaces manual .
Physical-Nonlinear Calculation Method
RF-CONCRETE NL provides a physical-nonlinear calculation method. The calculation is carried out iteratively. This means that a stiffness is determined based on the loading, which in turn determines the distribution of internal forces. This calculation runs as an iterative process. The iterations run until a convergence criterion is achieved. This is the case if either the stiffness change or the deformation change in relation to the previous iteration step is below the convergence criterion.
Internally, the FE element is displayed in layers when using the nonlinear calculation method where different materials are assigned to the individual layers (reinforcement and concrete) and the individual concrete layers can have different stiffnesses during the calculation (cracking of the concrete).
You can find detailed information about this topic in the RF-CONCRETE Surfaces manual  in Chapter 2.8.
Comparing the Features of both Methods
Analytical Calculation Method | RF-CONCRETE Deflect:
- A very fast calculation method, also suitable for large structures.
- Based on the theoretical approach from DIN EN1992-1-1  7.4.3, it should only be used for structural components subjected to bending (plates).
- Creep is applied to the entire cross-section as a reduction of elastic modulus for concrete.
- Due to the shrinkage, an additional distortion is determined, which is added to the deformations.
Physical-Nonlinear Calculation Method | RF-CONCRETE NL:
- A very precise and all-purpose method, not limited solely to structural components mainly subjected to bending (for example, it can also be used for deep beams).
- Creep is applied to the entire cross-section in the compression zone as a reduction of elastic modulus for concrete.
- Shrinkage is considered internally on the load side as strain, but in this context, failure due to shrinkage strain is also possible.
This calculation is much more complex than the analytical method and is, therefore, considerably more computationally intensive.
Application Areas of these Methods
Four criteria are essential in deciding which method should be used for a particular situation.
For structures where individual structural components with a different loading situation act together, the nonlinear method should be used because it is not limited to structural components that are subjected to bending. One example is a cantilevered floor.
Due to the load situation, a structure that has mainly wall stresses should also be analyzed with the physical-nonlinear method from RF-CONCRETE NL. One example of this is a deep beam.
For large structures, we recommend attempting to avoid the physical-nonlinear method, because it requires a great deal of computing time.
If the deformation design according to DIN EN1992-1-1  7.4.1 (4) has to be carried out for the visual appearance, the simpler analytical method may be sufficient, and no accurate method has to be selected unnecessarily for the design.
If the deformation design according to DIN EN1992-1-1  7.4.1 (5) has to be carried out to avoid damaging adjacent structural components or if spacers have to be dimensioned, it is worth taking a closer look in connection with the design purpose. Under certain circumstances, it may be important not only that the determined deformation value is smaller than the required limit value, but that the deformation is also determined as precisely as possible.
Considering Special Effects
Shrinkage is particularly important here. While additional curvature due to shrinkage is determined when using the analytical method in RF-CONCRETE Deflect, the shrinkage can be considered more precisely when using the physical-nonlinear method. In RF-CONCRETE NL, the shrinkage is taken into account internally on the load side as elongation and can lead to additional curvature as well as additional effects due to restraint in the structure. As a result of the effects of restraint, shrinkage may in turn lead to cracking of the concrete. In this context, it is important to display the supports as precisely as possible, in particular the horizontal supports.
Furthermore, when using the physical-nonlinear calculation, it is possible to determine an additional value for the crack width direction. By layering the element, the crack depth can be determined and displayed.
Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Adrian Langhammer
Product Engineering & Customer Support
Mr. Langhammer is responsible for the development of the add-on modules for reinforced concrete, and provides technical support for our customers.
- Nonlinear Structural Analysis Software
- Structural Analysis & Design Software for Concrete Structures
Do you have questions or need advice?
Contact our free e-mail, chat, or forum support or find various suggested solutions and useful tips on our FAQ page.
This article deals with rectilinear elements whose cross-section is subjected to axial compressive force. The purpose of this article is to show how quite a lot of parameters defined in the Eurocodes for concrete column calculation are considered in the RFEM structural analysis software.
The material model Orthotropic Masonry 2D is an elastoplastic model that additionally allows softening of the material, which can be different in the local x- and y-direction of a surface. The material model is suitable for (unreinforced) masonry walls with in-plane loads.
- When converting from the manual definition of reinforcement areas to the automatic arrangement of reinforcement according to Window 1.4, the result of the deformation calculation differs, although the basic reinforcement has not been modified. What is the reason for this change?
- I obtain different results when comparing the deformation analysis in the RF‑CONCRETE add-on modules and another calculation program. What could be the reason for this?
- Is it also possible to perform a deformation analysis in cracked state for a 2D model in RF‑CONCRETE Surfaces?
- In RF‑CONCRETE Surfaces, I obtain a high amount of reinforcement in relation to a lever arm that is almost zero. How is such a small lever arm of internal forces created?
- What is the meaning of the superposition according to the CQC rule in a dynamic analysis??
- Does the program check the lap length of the vertical stirrups of a block foundation with smooth bucket sides?
- Why do I get a discontinuous area in the distribution of internal forces? In the area of the supported line, the shear force VEd shows a jump, which does not seems to be plausible.
- Is there a possibility in RFEM to define a global polar grid whose origin lies, for example, in the global zero point and which applies to several surfaces?
- When comparing RF‑CONCRETE Columns with another design software, I get different results. How to explain the differences?
- Is it possible to perform design without an additional reinforcement in RF‑CONCRETE Surfaces?
Structural engineering software for finite element analysis (FEA) of planar and spatial structural systems consisting of plates, walls, shells, members (beams), solids and contact elements
Design of reinforced concrete members and surfaces (plates, walls, planar structures, shells)
Analytical deformation analysis of plate structures consisting of reinforced concrete
Physical and geometrical nonlinear calculation of beam and plate structures consisting of reinforced concrete