Soil-Structure Interaction in RFEM
Information about the Free Webinar
Everything I Expected and More
"RFEM is everything I expected and more. I’m having a blast learning the software and the webinars are fantastic."
Nicholas J. Greven P.Eng.
07/23/2019
In this webinar, we show you various options for using soil models in RFEM.
Recorded Webinar
Date | Time
Event Language
EnglishContent
Soil-structure interaction in RFEMIn this webinar, we will show you various options for using soil models in RFEM.
Time Schedule
| 0:00 | Introduction |
| 2:25 | Presenting different soil models |
| 14:20 | Utilizing soil models in RFEM |
| 33:20 | Designing a floor slab |
Presentation Models to Download
Below, under Models to Download, you can find the models used in the webinar. This will allow you to independently follow the webinar step by step with the provided models.Speakers
Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Andreas Hörold
Marketing & Public Relations
Mr. Hörold takes care of the Dlubal Software website, creates press releases as well as marketing materials, and is the moderator of the German and English webinars.
Dipl.-Ing. (BA) Markus Baumgärtel
Customer Support
Mr. Baumgärtel provides technical support for customers of Dlubal Software.
Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Adrian Langhammer
Product Engineering & Customer Support
Mr. Langhammer is responsible for the development of the add-on modules for reinforced concrete, and provides technical support for our customers.
Keywords
Free online webinar RFEM RF-SOILIN Soil Structure Construction Model Interaction Soil models Eurocode 2 Eurocode 7
Downloads
Links
- Product Description | Structural Analysis Program RFEM
- First Steps with RFEM
- RFEM 5 Online Manual
- RF-SOILIN Add-on Module
Write Comment...
Write Comment...
Contact us
Do you have questions related to our webinars? Are you looking for suggestions on which webinar is relevant for your design projects?
Contact us via our free e-mail, chat, or forum support or use our FAQ page.
![[DE] KB 001654 | Berücksichtigung von Mitnahmeeffekten bei getrennten Bodenplatten mit RF-SOILIN](http://img.youtube.com/vi/AuY18u0BXK8/mqdefault.jpg)
Comparison of Different Soil Models Using RFEM
A foundation is usually created in RFEM using the subgrade reaction modulus method. The reason for this is the relatively easy and straightforward manageability. Also, no iterative calculations are necessary and the computing time is relatively short. The subgrade reaction means that, for example, a foundation plate is loaded flat elastically.
- For the settlement calculation in the RF‑SOILIN add-on module, the specific weight gamma and gamma,sat are required for the soil. What do I need the value gamma,sat for, and how is it assumed in the calculation?
- Is there a way how to easily prevent RF‑SOILIN from recalculating the foundation every time the load in the governing load case is changed?
- Why do I obtain such high contact stresses at the foundation edges of my floor slab?
- I have a roof structure resting on a steel column that runs to the foundations. The column runs through a perimeter wall that supports the false ceiling. A considerable part of the load from the roof is transferred to the wall. I want the steel column to carry all the vertical loads from the roof. How can I do it?
- Are the models and presentations from Info Day 2018 freely available, and can you send them to me?
- In RF‑CONCRETE Surfaces, I obtain a high amount of reinforcement in relation to a lever arm that is almost zero. How is such a small lever arm of internal forces created?
- What is the meaning of the superposition according to the CQC rule in a dynamic analysis??
- When converting from the manual definition of reinforcement areas to the automatic arrangement of reinforcement according to Window 1.4, the result of the deformation calculation differs, although the basic reinforcement has not been modified. What is the reason for this change?
- Does the program check the lap length of the vertical stirrups of a block foundation with smooth bucket sides?
- Why do I get a discontinuous area in the distribution of internal forces? In the area of the supported line, the shear force VEd shows a jump, which does not seems to be plausible.
