Verification Example 0037 | 1
Model to Download
Description
Write Comment...
Write Comment...
Disclaimer

Separate Load Entry for Structure or Foundation Design
In RF-/FOUNDATION Pro, the foundation design requires the definition of the corresponding loading (load cases, load combinations, or result combinations) for different design situations (STR, GEO, UPL, or EQU).
- I do not want to design a cross-section in the RF‑/STEEL EC3 add-on module. Can I quickly remove this cross-section from the selection?
- Are the models and presentations from Info Day 2018 freely available, and can you send them to me?
- How can I display the internal forces in the global coordinate system and not in the principal coordinate system of the cross-section?
- I am designing a set of members using the equivalent member method in RF‑/STEEL EC3, but the calculation fails. The system is unstable, delivering the message "Non-designable - ER055) Zero value of the critical moment on the segment".What could be the reason?
- I want to create a mapped mesh for a circular hole plate. Is it possible to generate such a mesh in RFEM?
- I have a trapezoidal roof structure supported by beams. However, the moments on the beams are smaller than they should be. What could be the reason for this?
- Is it possible to divide a free surface load by the existing lines in RFEM?
- I am designing a cross-section created in the SHAPE‑THIN program using the design add-on module, but the program shows the error message "ER006 Invalid type of c/t-part for cross-section of type General". What can I do?
- How do I display some results of all load cases in the printout report, but other results of selected load cases only?
- Why are some load cases displayed in red in RF‑STEEL EC3?