We provide hints and tips to help you get started with the basic program RFEM.
Home Support & Learning Learning Videos FAQ 004848 | I design an eccentrically modeled wall beam in RF‑/STEEL Warping Torsion, which is loaded transversely with a distributed load. While the bending moments in the main program result in zero at the member start and member end due to the hinges, the RF‑/STEEL Warping Torsion add-on module displays moments at these locations, which incorrectly reduces the span moment.<div>How do I get the boundary moments equal to zero at this point?</div>
FAQ 004848 | I design an eccentrically modeled wall beam in RF‑/STEEL Warping Torsion, which is loaded transversely with a distributed load. While the bending moments in the main program result in zero at the member start and member end due to the hinges, the RF‑/STEEL Warping Torsion add-on module displays moments at these locations, which incorrectly reduces the span moment.<div>How do I get the boundary moments equal to zero at this point?</div>
Video
First Steps with RFEM
Question
I design an eccentrically modeled wall beam in RF‑/STEEL Warping Torsion, which is loaded transversely with a distributed load. While the bending moments in the main program result in zero at the member start and member end due to the hinges, the RF‑/STEEL Warping Torsion add-on module displays moments at these locations, which incorrectly reduces the span moment.How do I get the boundary moments equal to zero at this point?
Answer
Since the RF‑/STEEL EC3 or RF‑/STEEL Warping Torsion add-on module has its own solver, the eccentricities must also be considered here.
Therefore, it is recommended to adjust the support eccentricities within the add-on module, see Image 01.
Image 01 - Adjusting Eccentricity in Add-on Module
Thus, the span moment becomes maximum and the boundary moments zero, see Image 02.
Keywords
Dlubal FAQ horizontal beam Wall beam Eccentric Bending moment Moment Frequently Asked Question FAQ about Dlubal Question and Answer about Dlubal
Links
Contact us
Do you have any questions about our products or need advice on selecting the products needed for your projects?
Contact us via our free e-mail, chat, or forum support or find various suggested solutions and useful tips on our FAQ page.
Recommended Events
Eurocode 3 | Steel structures according to DIN EN 1993-1-1
Online Training 03/18/2021 8:30 AM - 12:30 PM CET
Eurocode 3 | Steel structures according to DIN EN 1993-1-1
Online Training 05/06/2021 8:30 AM - 12:30 PM
Membrane Structures with Wind Loads from CFD Wind Simulation
Webinar 03/24/2020 3:00 PM - 4:15 PM CET
Videos
KB 001649 | Stability Analysis of a Purlin With I-Section Without Lateral and Torsional Restraint
Length min
KB 000585 | Calculation of warping springs for consideration in lateral -torsional buckling analy...
Length 1:30 min
Models to Download
Knowledge Base Articles

Stability Analysis of a Purlin With I-Section Without Lateral and Torsional Restraint
This technical article deals with the stability analysis of a roof purlin, which is connected without stiffeners by means of a bolt connection on the lower flange to have a minimum manufacturing effort.
Screenshots
Product Features Articles

SHAPE-THIN | Cold-Formed Sections
SHAPE-THIN determines the effective cross-sections according to EN 1993-1-3 and EN 1993-1-5 for cold-formed sections. You can optionally check the geometric conditions for the applicability of the standard specified in EN 1993‑1‑3, Section 5.2.
The effects of local plate buckling are considered according to the method of reduced widths and the possible buckling of stiffeners (instability) is considered for stiffened sections according to EN 1993-1-3, Section 5.5.
As an option, you can perform an iterative calculation to optimize the effective cross-section.
You can display the effective cross-sections graphically.
Read more about designing cold-formed sections with SHAPE-THIN and RF-/STEEL Cold-Formed Sections in this technical article: Design of a Thin-Walled, Cold-Formed C-Section According to EN 1993-1-3.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
-
I design an eccentrically modeled wall beam in RF‑/STEEL Warping Torsion, which is loaded transversely with a distributed load. While the bending moments in the main program result in zero at the member start and member end due to the hinges, the RF‑/STEEL Warping Torsion add-on module displays moments at these locations, which incorrectly reduces the span moment.
How do I get the boundary moments equal to zero at this point? - When entering data in the RF‑/STEEL EC3 add-on module, I get the error message "Incorrect location of the intermediate lateral restraint". Why?
- To which axes refer the support rotations and support eccentricities in RF‑/STEEL EC3 Warping Torsion?
- What does the load application point in RF-/STEEL EC3 Warping Torsion refer to?
-
What are the options in RFEM or RSTAB for determining the ideal elastic critical moment for any cross-sections and systems/loads?
Is it also possible to design flat steel (brackets, flat steel stringers of staircases)?
- Why do I get large differences for the design of a longitudinally stiffened buckling panel in comparison with the German and Austrian National Annex?
- How are the signs for the release results of a line release and line hinges interpreted?
- How can I create a curved or arched section?
- How can I perform the stability analysis in RF‑/STEEL EC3 for a flat bar supported on edges, such as 100/5? Although the cross-section is rotated by 90° in RFEM/RSTAB, it is displayed as lying flat in RF‑/STEEL EC3.
- How is the rotational stiffness of a buckling stiffener determined in PLATE‑BUCKLING?
Customer Projects