I use member end releases with slippage in the longitudinal direction of the member. However, the calculation is always aborted, displaying the instability message. How can I optimize the system accordingly?


Due to the nonlinear calculation, especially the definition of slippage is a challenge for the equation solver. The following hints can help you to avoid possible instabilities.

Load Increments
When considering nonlinearities, it is often difficult to find the equilibrium. You can avoid instabilities by applying the loading in several steps (see Figure 01). For example, if two load steps are specified, half of the load is applied in the first step. The iterations are performed until the equilibrium is found. Then, in the second step, the complete load is applied to the already deformed system and the iterations are performed again until the state of equilibrium is reached. Please keep in mind that the load increments have an unfavorable effect on the computing time. Therefore, 1 (that is, no incrementally increasing load) is preset in the text box. Furthermore, it is possible to specify how many load steps should be applied for each load case and load combination (see Figure 02). The global settings are then ignored.

Definition of Slippage
Generally, slippage (for example, in a connection) is defined by means of the "Partial Activity" nonlinearity (see Figure 03). It can be used to define the hinge displacement from which the forces should be transferred. As you can see in the diagram, the stop, that is the stiffness that acts according to the corresponding release displacement, is considered as rigid (vertical branch, see the red arrows). However, under certain circumstances, this may lead to numerical problems in the calculation. To avoid this, the stiffness that acts according to the release displacement should be slightly reduced. You can achieve this by defining a very stiff spring (see Figure 04).

In addition to the very stiff stop, numerical problems may occur within the slippage. In this case, a small stiffness has to be considered for the effect of the slippage in order to increase the horizontal branch a little bit. The stiffness should be selected so small that it has no decisive effect (see Figure 05). This situation is possible by using the "Diagram"nonlinearity.

Arrangement of Member Hinges
When arranging the hinges, you should ensure that they are not defined in the same direction on both member ends. Thus, there is a state in which the member is not sufficiently supported and the system already fails in the first iterations. In such a case, the slippage on one side of the member only should be defined and the size of the slippage adjusted accordingly (see Figure 06).


Slippage Displacement Instability



Contact us

Did you find your question?
If not, contact us via our free e-mail, chat, or forum support, or send us your question via the online form.

+49 9673 9203 0


RFEM Main Program
RFEM 5.xx

Main Program

Structural engineering software for finite element analysis (FEA) of planar and spatial structural systems consisting of plates, walls, shells, members (beams), solids and contact elements

Price of First License
3,540.00 USD
RSTAB Main Program
RSTAB 8.xx

Main Program

The structural engineering software for design of frame, beam and truss structures, performing linear and nonlinear calculations of internal forces, deformations, and support reactions

Price of First License
2,550.00 USD