We provide hints and tips to help you get started with the RFEM program.
FAQ 003438 | When converting from the manual definition of reinforcement areas to the automatic arrangement of reinforcement according to Window 1.4, the result of the deformation calculation differs, although the basic reinforcement has not been modified. What is the reason for this change?
Video
First Steps with RFEM
Question
When converting from the manual definition of reinforcement areas to the automatic arrangement of reinforcement according to Window 1.4, the result of the deformation calculation differs, although the basic reinforcement has not been modified. What is the reason for this change?Answer
When using the automatic arrangement of the reinforcement, make sure that the additional reinforcement is applied, if necessary, for the serviceability limit state designs in addition to the basic reinforcement. The default setting in the add-on module is selected in such a way that the required reinforcement from the ultimate limit state is also applied for the SLS.
You can select the reinforcement that is applied for the SLS in "Additional Reinforcement for Serviceability State Design." The Info button explains the individual options (Figure 02).
The reinforcement applied to the designs can be followed by using the "Selected Reinforcement for SLS Check" function (Figure 03).
Keywords
Dlubal FAQ Deformation State II Specified reinforcement Basic reinforcement Frequently Asked Question FAQ about Dlubal Question and Answer about Dlubal
Links
Write Comment...
Write Comment...
Contact us
Do you have any questions about our products or need advice on selecting the products needed for your projects?
Contact us via our free e-mail, chat, or forum support or find various suggested solutions and useful tips on our FAQ page.
Recommended Events
Videos
Models to Download
Knowledge Base Articles

New
Shear Resistance Vc According to ACI 318-19
With the most recent ACI 318-19 standard, the long-term relationship to determine the concrete shear resistance, Vc, are redefined.Screenshots
Product Features Articles

Material Model Orthotropic Masonry 2D
The material model Orthotropic Masonry 2D is an elastoplastic model that additionally allows softening of the material, which can be different in the local x- and y-direction of a surface. The material model is suitable for (unreinforced) masonry walls with in-plane loads.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
- Is it also possible to perform a deformation analysis in cracked state for a 2D model in RF‑CONCRETE Surfaces?
- I obtain different results when comparing the deformation analysis in the RF‑CONCRETE add-on modules and another calculation program. What could be the reason for this?
- When converting from the manual definition of reinforcement areas to the automatic arrangement of reinforcement according to Window 1.4, the result of the deformation calculation differs, although the basic reinforcement has not been modified. What is the reason for this change?
- I often edit the reinforcement provided by the program. Adjusting the reinforcement by using coordinates takes much effort and time if having several beams in the model. Is there any way to speed up the reinforcement editing?
- How do you define the descriptions of various reinforcement results,such as the required reinforcement?
- Why do I get such a small amount of reinforcement for the upstand beam? The amount of reinforcement for the downstand beams is significantly larger.
- How are the creep and shrinkage for columns considered in RF‑CONCRETE Members?
- Which filter settings should be selected in the material library for concrete in order to perform design in RF‑CONCRETE according to the Swedish National Annex? In RFEM, there is no Swedish standard group available for the selection.
- How can I export the reinforcement results from RF‑CONCRETE Surfaces to Excel?
- How can I display the vertical deformation of a column in state II? I cannot find this setting for the serviceability limit state design.