FAQ 003438 EN
Keywords
Deformation State II (cracked) Provided reinforcement Basic reinforcement
Downloads
Write Comment...
Write Comment...
Contact Us
Unable to find the answer to your question? Contact us via phone, email, chat or forum or send us your question directly through our online form.
Submit Individual Question
Differences Between the Analytical and Nonlinear Deformation Analyses of Reinforced Concrete
Different methods are available for calculating the deformation in the cracked state. RFEM provides an analytical method according to DIN EN 1992-1-1 7.4.3 and a physical-nonlinear analysis.
- I obtain different results when comparing the deformation analysis in the RF‑CONCRETE add-on modules and another calculation program. What could be the reason for this?
-
Is it also possible to perform a deformation analysis in the cracked state for a 2D model in RF‑CONCRETE Surfaces?
-
The limit stress is activated, but my stress ratio is “non-designable” in the Stress-Strain Analysis add-on. What could be the reason?
- How do I define effective lengths when designing steel members in RFEM 6?
- Is it possible to change the properties of members or surfaces in the individual construction stages, such as their location?
-
In RFEM 6, is it possible to display a graphic with the distribution of the required reinforcement in the DIN A0 format?
- I have trouble with design of a steel structure. For a singly symmetric cross-section (UPE), the program cannot perform the stability analysis. It reports that the Equivalent Member Method 6.3.3 is not applicable for an unsymmetrical cross-section. Is it possible to design such cross-sections in the program?
Associated Products
- How do I define effective lengths when designing steel members in RFEM 6?