FAQ 001454 EN
Keywords
Integrate internal forces Integrate stresses Integration Result Beam
Downloads
Write Comment...
Write Comment...
Contact us
Did you find your question?
If not, contact us via our free e-mail, chat, or forum support, or send us your question via the online form.
New
Alternative to Gamma Method: Flexible composite beam as a framework model
Besides the standardized gamma method, you can display the semi-rigid composite beams also as a framework model.
![Relaxation Losses for 0.7 ∙ fpk According to EN 1992-1-1 [1]](/-/media/Images/website/pages/solutions/online-tools/glossary/000211/2707400.png?la=en&mlid=C2E80B587F7242A5B9D48A27B3803F4A&hash=2B715A99FB4A24F27FD471E9D503F2F936DE6DF9)
New
Depending on stiffness, mass, and damping, structures react differently to wind action.
- How do I display the utilization rate of a compression column in RF-CONCRETE Members?
- Why do I get the error message 10203 for a result beam when performing design with RF‑CONCRETE Members?
- I have a model of a timber building, which I have transferred from Scia Engineer and adapted it into the RFEM program. The models should be the same; however, it can only be calculated in Scia Engineer while RFEM reports singularity. How do I edit the model to analyze it in RFEM?
- How can I model a timber-concrete composite floor?
- Is it possible to model a slab made of trapezoidal sheet metals?
- Is it possible to display the mean value of the line support results?
-
Which units are specified in the result display of the support reactions (kN or kN/m)? A note about this is missing in the graphic.
In the case that the support reactions are given in kN/m, for which distance does the value apply? - I design a cross-section created in the SHAPE‑THIN program by using the RF‑STEEL EC3 add-on module, but the program shows the error message "ER006 Invalid type of c/t-part for cross-section of type General." What can I do?
- How can I consider a sway bracing in CRANEWAY?
-
I have modeled a ceiling slab supported on a shear wall. The shear wall should only absorb axial forces. So I have inserted a line hinge between the surfaces and defined it the way that the hinges are available for all internal forces except for those in the ux direction.
Although there is no hinge defined for ux, the plate deforms without being supported by the shear wall. Where is the error?
Associated Products
Main Program
Structural engineering software for finite element analysis (FEA) of planar and spatial structural systems consisting of plates, walls, shells, members (beams), solids and contact elements
3,540.00 USD
