FAQ 004363 EN
4 March 2020
004363
According to which regulation or standard are composite beams designed in the program COMPOSITE‑BEAM 8.xx?
Answer
The COMPOSITE‑BEAM program allows for design of composite beams according to the preliminary standard ENV 1994‑1‑1:1992:10.
Until further notice, the pre-standard is only implemented. The design according to EN 1994‑1‑1 is currently not possible.
See also the product description of COMPOSITE‑BEAM on the product page under the following link.
Keywords
Composite Composite beam Standard Regulation
Downloads
Links
Contact us
Did you find your question?
If not, contact us via our free e-mail, chat, or forum support, or send us your question via the online form.
Recommended Events
Eurocode 3 | Steel structures according to DIN EN 1993-1-1
Online Training 6 May 2021 8:30 AM - 12:30 PM CEST
Eurocode 2 | Concrete structures according to DIN EN 1992-1-1
Online Training 12 May 2021 8:30 AM - 12:30 PM CEST
Stability Design in Steel Construction with RFEM and RSTAB
Webinar 1 December 2020 2:00 PM - 2:45 PM CET
Designing Cold-Formed Steel Sections According to Eurocode 3
Webinar 30 April 2020 3:00 PM - 3:45 PM CEST
Videos

RFEM 5 Tutorial for Students | 015 Dynamics: Response Spectrum Analysis | Input Data
Length 9:17 min

KB 000778 | Manual cross-section classification for steel and aluminum design according to Eurocode
Length 0:30 min
Models to Download
Knowledge Base Articles

New
CSA S16:19 Stability Considerations and the New Annex O.2
Structure stability is not a new phenomenon when referring to steel design. The Canadian steel design standard CSA S16 and the most recent 2019 release is no exception.
Screenshots
Product Features Articles

Material Model Orthotropic Masonry 2D
The material model Orthotropic Masonry 2D is an elastoplastic model that additionally allows softening of the material, which can be different in the local x- and y-direction of a surface. The material model is suitable for (unreinforced) masonry walls with in-plane loads.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
- How to calculate the static depth d when designing the bending of block foundations (calculation as an equivalent beam)?
-
Why are my steel members not being designed for stability in RF-STEEL AISC?
- My section is classified as Class 4 and non-designable in RF-/STEEL CSA. However, my manual calculation shows a different class. Why the difference?
- I have defined temperature loads, strain loads, or a precamber. As soon as I modify stiffnesses, the deformations are no longer plausible.
- Can the properties, such as B. the cross -section or the surface thickness as well as the material of a surface of an existing element for a new element?
- When should the punching load be determined with the (un)smoothed distribution of the shear forces at the critical perimeter?
- I would like to perform the punching shear design on a column with connected downstand beams as a wall corner or Perform wall end. However, the module applies an internal column. Is it possible to adjust it?
- I am getting the message that my material does not meet the requirements of the current standard. How can I correct this?
- Is it possible to design bidirectional ribbed plates, unidirectional ribbed plates, or hollow core slabs in RFEM?
- I am trying to manually check the deformations from the CRANEWAY add-on module. However, I obtain great deviations. How to explain the differences?
Customer Projects