In CRANEWAY, the action of a rail as "statically effective" or "statically ineffective" is defined under "Rail‑Flange Connection" in the Details dialog box. This setting controls the calculation of the load introduction length according to EN 1993-6, Tab. 5.1.
In the event of converting or extending a hall, the building owner may want to add a second or third crane to an existing crane runway. Since the original design usually does not consider other cranes, a common solution is to design a minimum distance between the cranes. This is done via the crane technology settings.
The network-capable Project Manager controls the projects of all Dlubal Software applications in one central location. The projects are linked to the folders on the hard disk.
When using interrupted welds between the rail and flange, make sure that the applied weld length does not exceed the length of the rigid load application of the wheel load according to Equation 6.1 in [1].
In CRANEWAY 8, you can design suspension cranes according to EN 1993-6. For the design, it is necessary to determine the local bending stresses in the lower flange due to wheel loads according to EN 1993‑6, Clause 5.8.
This article describes the different options for determining the allowable deformation of crane runway girders. Since multi-span beams and flexible lateral supports (sway bracing) are used in practice, this article will show how to select the correct method.
For crane runways with large spans, the horizontal load from skewing is often relevant for the design. This article describes the origin of these forces and the correct input in CRANEWAY. The practical implementation and the theoretical background are discussed.
For suspension cranes, the bottom chord of the runway girder is subjected to local flange bending due to the wheel loads in addition to the main load-bearing capacity. The bottom chord behaves like a slab due to these local bending stresses, and has a biaxial stress condition [1].
At the end of the topic on the design of welds on runway beams - after the technical articles about the rail weld seam in the ultimate limit state and the limit state of fatigue - a technical article about web fillet welds now follows. Both the ultimate limit state and the fatigue limit state are considered.
Based on the technical article about the ultimate limit state design of rail welds, the following explanation refers to the process of fatigue design of rail welds. In particular, this article explains in detail the effects of considering an eccentric wheel load of 1/4 of the rail head width.
The eccentric wheel load application of 1/4 of the rail head width has to be considered only for fatigue design from damage class S3 according to DIN EN 1993‑6. An additional input option in detail settings allows you to consider this eccentricity for fatigue design at the ultimate limit state as well. By selecting this option, the design with the eccentric load applied is always considered without regard to the damage class.
In CRANEWAY, the eccentric wheel loading of 1/4 of the rail head width is used for the fatigue design of welds as well as for craneway girder design according to the National Annex of Germany and as of damage class S3.
If crane runway girders are designed with flat steel rails, the welding of these rails is always a detail for the design. You can generally select between continuous and intermittent fillet welds as a rail fixing. The following article provides an overview of the design processes and their specific features, especially when using the EN 1993-6.
NCI to DIN EN 1993‑6, Part 2.3.1 allows reductions of dynamic coefficients for values ≧ 1.1. Therefore, you can use these reduced support loads for designing support and hanger structures. In CRANEWAY, if you select National Annex "DIN" and dynamic coefficients ≧ 1.1, the reduction is considered automatically.
In CRANEWAY, the welds between the flanges and the web of a cross‑section are dimensioned. Options are available for defining the weld as a double fillet weld or a butt weld.