A reinforced concrete beam is designed as a two-span beam with a cantilever. The cross-section varies along the length of the cantilever (tapered cross-section). The internal forces, the required longitudinal and shear reinforcement for the ultimate limit state are calculated.
In this example, the shear at the interface between concrete cast at different times and the corresponding reinforcement are determined according to DIN EN 1992-1-1. The obtained results with RFEM 6 will be compared to the hand calculation below.
The available standards, such as EN 1991-1-4 [1], ASCE/SEI 7-16, and NBC 2015 presented wind load parameters such as wind pressure coefficient (Cp) for basic shapes. The important point is how to calculate wind load parameters faster and more accurately rather than working on time-consuming as well as sometimes complicated formulas in standards.
Determine the torsional constant for the cross-section of the tube (annular area) analytically, and compare the results with the numerical solution in RFEM 5 and RSTAB 8 for various wall thicknesses.
In the current validation example, we investigate wind force coefficient (Cf) of cube shapes with EN 1991-1-4 [1]. There are three dimensional cases that we will explain more about if in the next part.
The model is based on the example 4 of [1]: Point-supported slab.
The flat slab of an office building with crack-sensitive lightweight walls is to be designed. Inner, border and corner panels are to be investigated. The columns and the flat slab are monolithically joined. The edge and corner columns are placed flush with the edge of the slab. The axes of the columns form a square grid. It is a rigid system (building stiffened with shear walls).
The office building has 5 floors with a floor height of 3.000 m. The environmental conditions to be assumed are defined as "closed interior spaces". There are predominantly static actions.
The focus of this example is to determine the slab moments and the required reinforcement above the columns under full load.
A thin plate is fixed on one side and loaded by means of distributed torque on the other side. First, the plate is modeled as a planar plate. Furthermore, the plate is modeled as one-fourth of the cylinder surface. The width of the planar model is equal to the length of one-fourth of the circumference of the curved model. The curved model thus has almost equal torsional constant to the planar model.
A cantilever of I-profile is supported on the left end and it is loaded by the torque M. The aim of this example is to compare the fixed support with the fork support and to investigate the behaviour of some representative quantities. The comparison with the solution by means of plates is also made. The verification example is based on the example introduced by Gensichen and Lumpe.
A steel cantilever with a rectangular cross‑section is fully fixed on one side and free on the other. The aim of this verification example is to determine the natural frequencies of the structure.
A thin circular ring of a rectangular cross-section is exposed to external pressure. Determine the critical load and corresponding load factor for in-plane buckling.