If this difference occurs in the design of Bending and compression according to 6.3.3, you can find the explanation in Eurocode 1993‑1‑1 6.3.3. (4). The following is written in the explanations of the variables: "the design values of the nominal compressive force and the applied maximum moments." The emphasis should be on "maximum". Thus, the corresponding axial force is applied in the case of the design by x-location, but the maximum moments on the member or set of members are applied.
Question
When analyzing a member in RF‑/STEEL EC3, the result windows show a difference between the moments listed in the design internal forces and the moments used in the design. What has caused this difference?
Shear walls and deep beams of a building model are available as independent objects in the design add-ons. This allows for faster filtering of the objects in results, as well as better documentation in the printout report.
The building story generator in the Building Model add-on allows you to automatically create building stories, depending on the topology of the model.
In the Concrete Design provides an option to perform seismic design according to AISC 341-16 for steel members.
Five SFRS types (Seismic Force-Resisting Systems) are available for this.
The combination wizard provides you with the option to consider more than one initial state. RFEM and RSTAB allow you to specify different initial states (prestress, form-finding, strain, and so on) for the target combinations in the combinatorics.
You can thus, for example, generate load states on the basis of a form-finding analysis with varying imperfections.