Notes on Considering Flush Beam Strips or Intermittent Ceiling Supports in Reinforced Concrete Structures
According to Book 631 of the DAfStb (German Committee for Structural Concrete), Chapter 2.4, the structural behavior of ceilings changes if their continuous support by walls is interrupted in areas of openings. Depending on the length of the opening area and the plate thickness, measures are necessary regarding the analysis of the ceiling in the area of the opening.
ln / h < 7: Additional structural reinforcement layout without additional design is sufficient. In this case, the support can be assumed to be constant.
7 < ln / h < 15: The opening must be considered in the design. A simplified design according to Book 631 2.4.3. can be carried out when creating a reinforced supporting strip (flush beam strip). Together with the computer-aided slab design (RFEM and RF-CONCRETE), this is not necessary considering the existing geometry.
ln / h > 15: A simplified view as a reinforced supporting strip (flush beam strip) is not allowed. You have to consider it by using a computer-aided slab design (RFEM and RF-CONCRETE).
In the following, we show two options to consider a reinforced supporting strip (flush beam strip) in RFEM.
Analysis on Equivalent Structure of the Reinforced Supporting Strip (Flush Beam Strip)
Taking into account a load application area and an effective width, you can perform the calculation on an equivalent system.
The load application results in the maximum as a half span (l/2), but generally over a load distribution angle of 60°.
If no slab design is available and the condition 7 < ln / h < 15 is fulfilled, you can perform the design on the equivalent system. However, if you perform the calculation in RFEM, you do not have to consider this approach. If you want to perform a design on the beam, you can use the result beam. You can assign an integration width to the result beam corresponding to the load application (simplified as a constant distribution with a maximum integration width in the mid-span).
Plate Design Based on Existing Geometry
As described in Book 631 2.4.3 b), a plate design can be performed for all areas with ln / h. If you compare the results for the required reinforcement for the slab design in the area of the load application with the reinforcement determined on the equivalent system (result beam), the result is practically the same.
In connection with the reinforcement design, the question arises regarding the stiffness distribution. If the reinforcement is concentrated along a line, that is, like a beam reinforcement, it can be assumed that the stiffness increases in this area. However, it is questionable whether this has to be considered in the design. If you increase the stiffness of the slab along a strip as an example, the following behavior appears.
The required reinforcement is concentrated in the area of the plate strip whose bending stiffness has been increased by 50%, for example. However, the sum of the entire reinforcement distribution remains approximately the same. The load does not increase, but only distributes itself differently and is concentrated on the stiffer element.
Is it necessary to design a flush beam strip with a member?
To determine the required longitudinal reinforcement, it is not necessary to perform a design on the beam. A design of the surface results in approximately the same amount of reinforcement, but a different distribution.
Is it necessary to increase the stiffness of the flush beam strip due to concentrated reinforcement?
It is not necessary to increase the stiffness. The distribution of the stiffness depends on the distribution of the reinforcement. If the reinforcement is concentrated in the area of the intermittent support, it can be assumed that there is an increased stiffness, consequently an increased loading and finally a higher determined required reinforcement. Conversely, a lower stiffness would result if the reinforcement is not concentrated in the area of the intermittent support.
Do you have questions or need advice?
Contact our free e-mail, chat, or forum support or find various suggested solutions and useful tips on our FAQ page.
Models to Download
Knowledge Base Articles
Result Diagram Required As | Required Reinforcement for the Slab Shown in Section (Mid-Span) | Reinforcement Distribution
FEA Software RFEM & Structural Analysis Software RSTAB | Video Tutorial | Strong on analysis and documentation. Better service for your customers.
Product Features Articles
The material model Orthotropic Masonry 2D is an elastoplastic model that additionally allows softening of the material, which can be different in the local x- and y-direction of a surface. The material model is suitable for (unreinforced) masonry walls with in-plane loads.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
- Is it possible to enter and design a reinforced concrete surface with a reinforcement layer in the center of the surface?
- I have defined a wind profile for RWIND Simulation up to a height of 100 m. Is the wind profile dependent on the size of the wind tunnel?
- As part of my bachelor thesis, I would like to integrate the RSTAB printout report into LaTeX. There, you can completely integrate a PDF document as shown in the viewer. This also works with any PDF document, but not with the printout report created by RSTAB. What could be the reason?
- How can I teach the program that it automatically increases the longitudinal reinforcement when calculating the deflection of the slabs so that the specified deflection is met?
- I calculate the deformations at time 0 and at time infinite. The deformations at the time infinite seem plausible to me. The deformations at time 0 seem significantly smaller and therefore implausible. What is the reason?
- How can I set the deformation coefficient kdef in the program?
- Does the program use different values of modulus of elasticity for different temperatures? How to activate it?
- I would like to design an aluminum or lightweight structure. Is it possible to use RFEM or RSTAB for this?
- I would like to move some elements. When moving, my members are deleted, what is the reason?
- I am using COM interface and Grasshopper for the calculation of complicated structures. For this task I need to create NURBS lines. Could you explain how NURBS should be set? For example what kind of data should be provided for Knots?
Structural engineering software for finite element analysis (FEA) of planar and spatial structural systems consisting of plates, walls, shells, members (beams), solids and contact elements
Design of reinforced concrete members and surfaces (plates, walls, planar structures, shells)
Module Extension for RFEM
Extension of the modules for reinforced concrete design by the Eurocode 2 design