Notes on Considering Flush Beam Strips or Intermittent Ceiling Supports in Reinforced Concrete Structures
According to Book 631 of the DAfStb (German Committee for Structural Concrete), Chapter 2.4, the structural behavior of ceilings changes if their continuous support by walls is interrupted in areas of openings. Depending on the length of the opening area and the plate thickness, measures are necessary regarding the analysis of the ceiling in the area of the opening.
ln / h < 7: Additional structural reinforcement layout without additional design is sufficient. In this case, the support can be assumed to be constant.
7 < ln / h < 15: The opening must be considered in the design. A simplified design according to Book 631 2.4.3. can be carried out when creating a reinforced supporting strip (flush beam strip). Together with the computer-aided slab design (RFEM and RF-CONCRETE), this is unnecessary, considering the existing geometry.
ln / h > 15: A simplified view as a reinforced supporting strip (flush beam strip) is not allowed. You have to consider it using a computer-aided slab design (RFEM and RF-CONCRETE).
In the following text, we show two options for considering a reinforced supporting strip (flush beam strip) in RFEM.
Analysis on an Equivalent Structure of the Reinforced Supporting Strip (Flush Beam Strip)
Taking into account a load application area and an effective width, you can perform the calculation on an equivalent system.
The load application results in the maximum as a half span (l/2), but generally over a load distribution angle of 60°.
If no slab design is available and the condition 7 < ln / h < 15 is fulfilled, you can perform the design on the equivalent system. However, if you perform the calculation in RFEM, you do not have to consider this approach. If you want to perform a design on the beam, you can use the result beam. You can assign an integration width to the result beam corresponding to the load application (simplified as a constant distribution with a maximum integration width in mid-span).
Plate Design Based on Existing Geometry
As described in Book 631 2.4.3 b), a plate design can be performed for all areas with ln / h. If you compare the results for the required reinforcement for the slab design in the area of the load application with the reinforcement determined on the equivalent system (result beam), the result is practically the same.
In connection with the reinforcement design, a question arises regarding the stiffness distribution. If the reinforcement is concentrated along a line (e.g., a beam reinforcement), it can be assumed that the stiffness increases in this area. However, it is questionable whether this has to be considered in the design. If you increase the stiffness of the slab along a strip as an example, the following behavior appears.
The required reinforcement is concentrated in the area of the plate strip of which the bending stiffness has been increased by 50%, for example. However, the sum of the entire reinforcement distribution remains approximately the same. The load does not increase, but only distributes itself differently and is concentrated on the stiffer element.
Is it necessary to design a flush beam strip with a member?
It is not necessary to perform a design on the beam to determine the required longitudinal reinforcement. A design of the surface results in approximately the same amount of reinforcement, but a different distribution.
Is it necessary to increase the stiffness of the flush beam strip due to concentrated reinforcement?
It is not necessary to increase the stiffness. The distribution of the stiffness depends on the distribution of the reinforcement. If the reinforcement is concentrated in the area of the intermittent support, it can be assumed that there is an increased stiffness, consequently an increased loading, and finally, a higher determined required reinforcement. Conversely, a lower stiffness would result if the reinforcement is not concentrated in the area of the intermittent support.
Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Adrian Langhammer
Product Engineering & Customer Support
Mr. Langhammer is responsible for the development of the add-on modules for reinforced concrete, and provides technical support for our customers.
Do you have questions or need advice?
Contact our free e-mail, chat, or forum support or find various suggested solutions and useful tips on our FAQ page.
This article compares the design to the one in the referenced article: Design of Concrete Columns Subjected to Axial Compression with RF-CONCRETE Members. It is, therefore, about taking exactly the same theoretical application carried out in RF-CONCRETE Members and reproducing it in RF-CONCRETE Columns. Thus, the objective is to compare the different input parameters and the results obtained by the two add-on modules for the design of column-like concrete members.
Result Diagram Required as | Required Reinforcement for the Slab Shown in Section (Mid-Span) | Reinforcement Distribution
- Is it possible to enter and design a reinforced concrete surface with a reinforcement layer in the center of the surface?
- Where can I find the materials for the corresponding National Annexes in RFEM 6 and RSTAB 9?
- I have a roof structure resting on a steel column that runs to the foundations. The column runs through a perimeter wall that supports the false ceiling. A considerable part of the load from the roof is transferred to the wall. I want the steel column to carry all the vertical loads from the roof. How can I do it?
- Are the models and presentations from Info Day 2018 freely available, and can you send them to me?
- In RF‑CONCRETE Surfaces, I obtain a high amount of reinforcement in relation to a lever arm that is almost zero. How is such a small lever arm of internal forces created?
- What is the meaning of the superposition according to the CQC rule in a dynamic analysis??
- When converting from the manual definition of reinforcement areas to the automatic arrangement of reinforcement according to Window 1.4, the result of the deformation calculation differs, although the basic reinforcement has not been modified. What is the reason for this change?
- Does the program check the lap length of the vertical stirrups of a block foundation with smooth bucket sides?
- Why do I get a discontinuous area in the distribution of internal forces? In the area of the supported line, the shear force VEd shows a jump, which does not seems to be plausible.
- Is there a possibility in RFEM to define a global polar grid with the origin lies in the global zero point, for example, and which applies to several surfaces?
Structural engineering software for finite element analysis (FEA) of planar and spatial structural systems consisting of plates, walls, shells, members (beams), solids and contact elements
Design of reinforced concrete members and surfaces (plates, walls, planar structures, shells)
Module Extension for RFEM
Extension of the modules for reinforced concrete design by the Eurocode 2 design