For the results of a result combination, I noticed that the result for many extreme locations is zero, although there must be results. Why is that?


These zero values are caused by the superposition type in the combination criterion: if you analyze several load cases or combinations in one result combination and define the load cases as 'Variable', then zero is shown for the maximum or minimum value at the locations with the same signs. When using the variable ('eventual') superposition, it can also happen that no load case or no combination becomes effective. Zero is smaller than the smallest maximum value or greater than the greatest minimum value.

A solution would be to define the load cases or combinations contained in the result combination as 'Permanent', for example: RC1 = CO1/Permanent or CO2/Permanent or CO3/Permanent or CO4/Permanent 

The load cases or combination are then compared as permanently acting. Thus, the obtained extreme values are unequal zero also for the areas with the same signs.


result combination maximum value minimum value extreme value superposition permanent variable combination

Contact us

Did you find your question?
If not, contact us via our free e-mail, chat, or forum support, or send us your question via the online form.

+49 9673 9203 0

RFEM Main Program
RFEM 5.xx

Main Program

Structural engineering software for finite element analysis (FEA) of planar and spatial structural systems consisting of plates, walls, shells, members (beams), solids and contact elements

Price of First License
3,540.00 USD
RSTAB Main Program
RSTAB 8.xx

Main Program

The structural engineering software for design of frame, beam and truss structures, performing linear and nonlinear calculations of internal forces, deformations, and support reactions

Price of First License
2,550.00 USD