Shear Force Reduction Vz When Performing Design in RF-CONCRETE Members and CONCRETE According to EN 1992-1-1
Technical Article
When performing shear force design in RF-CONCRETE Members and CONCRETE, you can reduce the acting shear force Vz according to EN 1992-1-1. The following article describes the reduction of the concentrated loads close to the support and the shear force design at a distance d from the support face for a uniform load.
This example shows the input and functionality of the shear force reduction for single loads close to the support as well as the design at a distance d from the support face using the example of a two-span beam.
System, Loading, and Combinatorics
We create a two-span beam with a span length of 4.0 m in RFEM or RSTAB. The rectangular cross-section has the dimensions w/h = 30/45 cm. We select a concrete of grade C25/30 as material.
The load for this example results from a permanent and a variable load. The permanent loads are entered in load case 1. This is the self-weight of the cross-section and a lineload of gk = 48.75 kN/m. As a variable load, we enter a line load of qk = 37.5 kN/m and, alternatively, a concentrated load introduction as three single loads with Qk = 37.5 kN (member load, concentrated n x P). We enter these two loads separately for the respective field and treat them alternatively in the combinatorics.
In RFEM and RSTAB, the automatic combinatorics is activated to create the load combinations for ULS and SLS. To avoid that the alternative load cases are combined with the distributed or concentrated loads, they are each assigned to a group.
Download the file at the end of this article to see all the other inputs we have made in RFEM and RSTAB.
Shear Force Distribution From RFEM and RSTAB
We can now calculate the internal forces for the two-span beam design in RF-CONCRETE Members or CONCRETE from the previously entered data. For the ULS design, this results in an enveloping RC1, which contains the shear force distribution from the uniform load on the one hand, and also from the alternative concentrated loads on the other.
To explain the following entries or the results of the reduction, the calculation does not use the enveloping RC1, but the individual LCs that have either a pure uniform load or a combination of equal and single load. In this case, only the cases with full load (left and right panel loaded simultaneously) are considered. The options described below are not available for the result combination design. See also the notes in the last section of this article.
Define Support Width
In Window "1.5 Support", you can enter the support width in column B. Please note that entering the support width without selecting the "Reduction of the shear forces in the support face..." option has no influence on the shear force design.
It is also possible to delete the entire Table 1.5 with the support and node number definitions. However, it may be necessary to specify supports without activating one of the available options for the shear force reduction if a deformation calculation is performed for the serviceability limit state. In this case, you can use the supports to calculate the reference length l0 to determine the maximum deformation limit value. For this purpose, there is this separate Window "1.7 Deflection Data" available - where the deformation analysis is activated - where you can select the supports defined here. This article does not go into this option further.
Direct Support
It is necessary to activate the direct support if, according to 6.2.2 (6) or 6.2.3 (8), single loads close to the support are to be reduced with ß = av / 2 d. If there is a secondary beam transferring its load to another beam and not to a "direct support" (column, nodal support, wall, etc.), you should clear this check box in Window 1.5.
Design at Distance d From the Support Face
If you have defined the support numbers of the nodal supports correctly in Window 1.5 and also set the support width, you can apply the reduced shear force for the design and determination of the required shear reinforcement with the selected option "Reduction of the shear forces in the support face and distance d acc. to 6.2.1 (8)".
You can see below the shear force distribution Vz,Ed and Vz,Ed,red including the design at a distance d and a defined support width of 25.0 cm.
You can see that the shear force at the x-location is set to zero exactly above the support. This results from the specification of "Design at distance d". The shear force distribution in the add-on module has a zero crossing at this location. At the perimeter or at the x-location of the support face is the maximum value of the non-reduced shear force Vz,Ed. The distance d from the support face results in the maximum value of the reduced shear force Vz,Ed,red.
Reduce Single Loads Close to the Support
To explain the reduction of single loads close to the support, the previously discussed two-span beam is now designed in RF-CONCRETE Members or CONCRETE for a CO with concentrated load application.
By activating the "Direct Support" function described above and the "Reduction of the shear forces with concentrated load acc. to 6.2.2 (6) and 6.2.3 (8)", single loads in the range of 0.5 d <av <2 d with ß = av/2 d are now reduced. This can be illustrated by comparing Vz,Ed with Vz,Ed,red.

Shear Force Distribution | Distribution of V-z,Ed and V-z,Ed,red for Single Loads Close to the Support
According to 6.2.2 (6), when applying the reduced value Vz,ED,red for the VRd,c design in Equation (6.2a), the applied longitudinal reinforcement (longitudinal reinforcement ratio ρl ) must be fully anchored to the support. Furthermore, you have to check the shear force determined without reduction ß with regard to the requirement according to Eq. (6.5).
For structural components with a calculated shear reinforcement according to [1] 6.2.3, the value Vz,Ed must be applied with ß according to 6.2.3 (8) for the design of VRd,max without reducing the individual loads close to the support.
Special Cases Ribs and Result Combinations
For the reduction of the concentrated loads close to the support as well as for the design of the uniformly distributed load at a distance d from the support, the add-on module analyzes the distribution of the shear force Vz from the internal forces of RFEM or RSTAB. With the shear force distribution analysis, the program recognizes a uniformly distributed load from a linear distribution of the shear force and the size of the concentrated loads close to the support from jumps in the shear force distribution.
The evaluation of the shear force distribution is therefore the basis for the shear force reduction mentioned here. This also results in the restriction that these options are not available for the design with a result combination (RC), since a uniformly distributed load cannot necessarily be assumed for an RC. See also the shear force distribution Vz in Image 03.
The same applies to the design of ribs when utilizing RF-CONCRETE Members. The rib internal forces are partly composed of the member internal forces of the eccentrically connected T-beam and partly the integrated surface internal forces of the connected plates. Singularities in the surface internal forces can now ensure that the integrated rib internal force (shear force Vz from RFEM) has no linear distribution in the program. Likewise, jumps in the shear force distribution Vz can result from a possible integration of singular surface internal forces. Therefore, the mentioned options to reduce the shear force are not available for rib member design.
Keywords
Shear force Shear force reduction Support face Concentrated load Reduction Design shear force Reinforced concrete structures
Reference
Links
Write Comment...
Write Comment...
Contact us
Do you have questions or need advice?
Contact our free e-mail, chat, or forum support or find various suggested solutions and useful tips on our FAQ page.
Recommended Events
Videos
Models to Download
Knowledge Base Articles

New
Create and use the ADETS welded mesh in the RF-CONCRETE Surfaces add-on module of RFEM
Concrete on its own is characterized by its compressive strength. To have reinforced concrete, the participation of reinforcing steels contributes to it thanks to their resistance capacity both in compression and especially in traction.
Screenshots
Product Features Articles

Material Model Orthotropic Masonry 2D
The material model Orthotropic Masonry 2D is an elastoplastic model that additionally allows softening of the material, which can be different in the local x- and y-direction of a surface. The material model is suitable for (unreinforced) masonry walls with in-plane loads.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
- How can I get the member end forces to design the connections?
- How can I perform the design of the tension resistance of a smooth column in a smooth bucket column base, that is, the design against pulling out the column?
- I often edit the reinforcement provided by the program. Adjusting the reinforcement by using coordinates takes much effort and time if having several beams in the model. Is there any way to speed up the reinforcement editing?
- How do you define the descriptions of various reinforcement results,such as the required reinforcement?
- How are the creep and shrinkage for columns considered in RF‑CONCRETE Members?
- Why do I get such a small amount of reinforcement for the upstand beam? The amount of reinforcement for the downstand beams is significantly larger.
- Which filter settings should be selected in the material library for concrete in order to perform design in RF‑CONCRETE according to the Swedish National Annex? In RFEM, there is no Swedish standard group available for the selection.
- How can I export the reinforcement results from RF‑CONCRETE Surfaces to Excel?
- How can I display the vertical deformation of a column in state II? I cannot find this setting for the serviceability limit state design.
- The RF‑CONCRETE Columns add-on module cannot determine any sufficient reinforcement. However, the columns can be easily designed in a comparative calculation. Can you help us?