Steel Bracket with Connection to Foundation Plate
Model to Download
Description
RF‑/FOUNDATION Pro allows you to check the allowable eccentricity of the overloading pressure resultants. According to DIN EN 1997‑1/NA, this design is to be carried out with the characteristic or representative loads.
Model Used in
Keywords
Column Foundation Geotechnics Rotation Eccentric loading Interface Eccentricity
Links
Write Comment...
Write Comment...
- Views 91x
- Downloads 15x
- Updated 18 January 2021
Disclaimer

New
Checking Allowable Eccentricity
RF‑/FOUNDATION Pro allows you to check the allowable eccentricity of the overloading pressure resultants. According to DIN EN 1997‑1/NA, this design is to be carried out with the characteristic or representative loads.

- Available types of foundation:
- Foundation plate (optionally without bending reinforcement)
- Bucket foundation with smooth bucket sides
- Bucket foundation with rough bucket sides
- Block foundation with smooth bucket sides
- Block foundation with rough bucket sides
- Design according to EN 1992-1-1 and EN 1997-1
- The following National Annexes of Eurocode 2 and Eurocode 7 are available:
-
Germany:
DIN EN 1992-1-1/NA/A1:2015-12 | DIN EN 1997-1/NA:2010-12 -
Austria:
ÖNORM B 1992-1-1:2018-01 | ÖNORM B 1997-1:2007-11 Denmark:
DK EN 1992-1-1/NA:2013 | DK EN 1997-1/NA:2007Bulgaria:
BDS EN 1992-1-1:2005/NA:2011 | BDS EN 1997-1:2005/NA:2012Finland:
SFS EN 1992-1-1/NA:2007-10 | SFS EN 1997-1/NA:2004-01-
France:
NF EN 1992-1-1/NA:2016-03 | NF EN 1997-1/NA:2006-09 Italy:
UNI EN 1992-1-1/NA:2007-07 | UNI EN 1997-1/NA:2005-01Netherlands:
NEN EN 1992-1-1 C2:2011/NB:2016-11 | NEN EN 1997-1+C1:2012/NB:2012Poland:
PN EN 1992-1-1/NA:2010 | PN EN 1997-1/NA:2005-05Slovakia:
STN EN 1992-1-1/NA:2008-06 | STN EN 1997-1/NA:2005-10Slovenia:
SIST EN 1992-1-1:2005/A101:2006 | SIST EN 1997-1/NA:2006-03Spain:
UNE EN 1992-1-1/NA:2013 | UNE EN 1997-1:2010Sweden:
SvenskS EN 1992-1-1/NA:2008 | SvenskS EN 1997-1:2005/AC:2009Czech Republic:
CSN EN 1992-1-1/NA:2016-05 | CSN EN 1997-1/NA:2014-06United Kingdom/Northern Ireland:
BS EN 1992-1-1:2004/NA:2005 | BS EN 1997-1:2004Belarus:
CPM EN 1992-1-1:2009 | CPM EN 1997-1:2009Cyprus:
CYS EN 1992-1-1:2004/NA:2009 | CYS EN 1997-1/NA:2004
-
In addition to the National Annexes (NA) listed above, you can also define a specific NA, applying user-defined limit values and parameters.
- Automatic calculation of governing loading from load cases
- Specification of additional support forces
- Determination of the reinforcement proposal for bottom and top plate reinforcement considering the most favorable combination of mat and rebars
- Individual adjustment of reinforcement proposal
- Results of foundation reinforcement in detailed reinforcement drawings
- Results displayed in tables and graphics
- Visualization of foundation, columns and reinforcement in 3D rendering
- Where can I specify in RF‑/FOUNDATION Pro whether the loading for the design of foundation rotation according to DIN EN 1997‑1 results from a permanent action or the combination of a permanent and a variable action?
- In FOUNDATION Pro, I get extremely large foundations of my structure or have to enter a very high loading to satisfy the design of highly eccentric loading in the core. What can be the reason for this?
-
How can I perform the stability analysis for an edgewise supported flat steel, for example 100/5, in RF-/STEEL EC3?
Although the cross-section is rotated by 90 ° in RFEM/RSTAB, it is displayed lying flat in RF-/STEEL EC3. - How can I create a curved or curved section?
- How are the signs to be interpreted for the releases, results of line releases and line hinges?
- How is the rotational stiffness of a buckling stiffener determined in FE-BUCKLING?
- How are hot -dip galvanized components considered for fire protection in the Steel EC 3 add -on module?
- Is it possible to manually specify a longitudinal reinforcement for the design in RF-PUNCH Pro?
- Can I simulate the cracked state of a concrete cross -section for a bending beam with the "Isotropic Nonlinear Elastic 1D" material model?
- Why is the deflection of the reinforced concrete floor sometimes greater when selecting a larger basic reinforcement?