The modal relevance factor is a result of the linear stability analysis and qualitatively describes the degree of participation of individual members in a specific mode shape.
Line releases are special objects in RFEM 6 that allow structural decoupling of objects connected to a line. They are mostly used to decouple two surfaces that are not rigidly connected or transferring only compressive forces at the common boundary line. By defining a line release, a new line is generated at the same place which transfers only the locked degrees of freedom. This article will show the definition of line releases in a practical example.
This article shows you how to define different types of member transverse stiffeners in RFEM 6 and RSTAB 9. It also shows you how to consider them in the design as well as the calculation of members with 7 degrees of freedom.
This article will show you how to use the Torsion Warping (7 DOF) add-on in combination with the Structure Stability add-on to consider cross-section warping as an additional degree of freedom when performing the stability analysis.
A member's boundary conditions decisively influence the elastic critical moment for lateral-torsional buckling Mcr. The program uses a planar model with four degrees of freedom for its determination. The corresponding coefficients kz and kw can be defined individually for standard-compliant cross-sections. This allows you to describe the degrees of freedom available at both member ends due to the support conditions.
In RF-/STEEL EC3, sets of members are calculated according to the General Method (EN 1993-1-1, Cl. 6.3.4) together with the stability analysis. To do this, it is necessary to determine the correct support conditions for the equivalent structure with four degrees of freedom. In most 3D models today, you can quickly lose track of the location of a set of members in the system.
To simulate a support clearance in a connection between members, you can use the "Diagram" function for member hinges. To use this function, first define the relevant degree of freedom as release. Then, you can select the "Diagram" function from the drop‑down list.
One of the advantages of entering the structure in RFEM is the complete freedom when selecting the geometry. You can easily select a structure where re‑entrant rolling corners are given as shown in the image.
The architectural requirements for guardrails are still very high, and railings usually require a high degree of transparency. Glass railings, which do not require a visible support frame, offer a possible solution.
The design of a torsional loaded beam according to AISC Design Guide 9 will be shown, based on a verification example. The design will be performed with the RF‑STEEL AISC add-on module and the RF‑STEEL Warping Torsion module extension with 7 degrees of freedom.
This article explains how to determine loads on the basis of the internal force situations defined in the RF‑/STEEL Warping Torsion extension of the RF‑/STEEL EC3 add-on module. Since this new program also allows you to analyze extracted chain-like beam structures in addition to entire chain-like beam structures, it is necessary to determine the loads of the partial structure separately. To do this, a special transformation function has been developed that determines new loads of all partial structures (depending on the internal forces calculated in RFEM/RSTAB) according to each load situation for geometrically nonlinear warping torsion analysis with seven degrees of freedom.
If you consider rotating the structure shown in the figure around the global Y‑axis, this might be not straightforward. In order to achieve better handling, the axis is always locked in the direction of your view. In the case of very high structures, it may be helpful to rotate the view about 90 degrees in the viewing direction.
You can define nonlinear supports in RFEM and RSTAB. In RFEM, these are represented by nodal, line, and surface supports. Many customers contact us because of nonlinearities that are apparently not acting as desired. For example, there is a failing line support in a model. Since the structure is statically determined as supported, a linear nodal support is usually added. If the nodal support rests at the start or the end of a nonlinearly supported line, there is no clear definition of the degrees of freedom, so the nonlinearity cannot be considered properly. In this case, RFEM displays a warning message.