22 Results
View Results:
Sort by:
The National Building Code of Canada (NBC) 2020 Article 4.1.8.7 provides a clear procedure for earthquake methods of analysis. The more advanced method, the Dynamic Analysis Procedure in Article 4.1.8.12, should be used for all structure types except those that meet the criteria set forth in 4.1.8.7. The more simplistic method, the Equivalent Static Force Procedure (ESFP) in Article 4.1.8.11, can be used for all other structures.
Given that realistic determination of the soil conditions significantly influences the quality of the structural analysis of buildings, the Geotechnical Analysis add-on is offered in RFEM 6 to determine the soil body to be analyzed.
The way to provide data obtained from field tests in the add-on and use the properties from soil samples to determine the soil massifs of interest was discussed in Knowledge Base article “Creation of the Soil Body from Soil Samples in RFEM 6”. This article, on the other hand, will discuss the procedure to calculate settlements and soil pressures for a reinforced concrete building.
The quality of the structural analysis of buildings is significantly improved when the soil conditions are considered as realistically as possible. In RFEM 6, you can realistically determine the soil body to be analyzed with the help of the Geotechnical Analysis add-on. This add-on can be activated in the model’s Base Data as shown in Image 01.
In RFEM and RSTAB, you can create add-on modules as favorites.
To simulate a support clearance in a connection between members, you can use the "Diagram" function for member hinges. To use this function, first define the relevant degree of freedom as release. Then, you can select the "Diagram" function from the drop‑down list.
For solids, there is another option for the FE mesh setting. You can arrange a layered FE mesh in addition to a holistic FE mesh refinement. For this option, you can perform a defined division of the solid with finite elements between two parallel surfaces. This option is particularly suitable for very large solid geometries with a low height.
- 000945
- Add-on Modules
- RF-FRAME-JOINT Pro 5
-
- JOINTS Steel | Column Base 8
- JOINTS Steel | DSTV 8
- JOINTS Steel | Pinned 8
- JOINTS Steel | Rigid 8
- JOINTS Steel | SIKLA 8
- JOINTS Steel | Tower 8
- JOINTS Timber | Steel to Timber 8
- JOINTS Timber | Timber to Timber 8
- RF-JOINTS Steel | SIKLA 5
- RF-JOINTS Steel | Column Base 5
- RF-JOINTS Steel | DSTV 5
- RF-JOINTS Steel | Pinned 5
- RF-JOINTS Steel | Rigid 5
- RF-JOINTS Steel | Tower 5
- RF-JOINTS Timber | Steel to Timber 5
- RF-JOINTS Timber | Timber to Timber 5
- FRAME-JOINT Pro 8
- Steel Structures
- Timber Structures
- Steel Connections
- Eurocode 3
- Eurocode 5
In addition to the result tables, you can create three-dimensional graphics in RF‑/FRAME‑JOINT Pro and RF‑/JOINTS. This is a realistic representation of a connection to scale.
In the tables of RFEM 5 and RSTAB 8, you can select the list of objects graphically by using the mouse.
The cross-section library in RFEM 5 and RSTAB 8 offers the option to save certain cross-section selections in different favorites groups.
The "Filter" option in the cross‑section library allows you to show only cross‑sections of certain standards, shapes, or types. In the same window, you can also select the material.
When optimizing cross-sections in the add-on modules, you can also select arbitrarily defined cross-section favorites lists - in addition to the cross-sections from the same cross-section series as the original cross-section.
When modeling frame structures, RFEM and RSTAB provide various options for controlling the transfer of internal forces and moments at the connection points of members. You can use the member types to determine whether only forces act on the connected members, or whether moments act on them as well. In addition, you can use hinges to exclude specific internal forces from the transfer. One special form is scissor hinges, which allow for realistic modeling of roof structures, for example.
The National Building Code of Canada (NBC) 2015 Article 4.1.8.7 provides a clear procedure for earthquake methods of analysis. The more advanced method, the Dynamic Analysis Procedure in Article 4.1.8.12, should be used for all structure types except those that meet the criteria set forth in 4.1.8.7. The more simplistic method, the Equivalent Static Force Procedure (ESFP) in Article 4.1.8.11, can be used for all other structures.
Structures are naturally three-dimensional. However, because it was impossible to perform calculations on three-dimensional models easily in the past, the structures were simplified and broken down into planar subsystems. With the increasing performance of computers and related software, it is often possible to do without these simplifications. Digital trends such as Building Information Modeling (BIM) and new options for creating realistic visualized models reinforce this trend. But do 3D models really offer an advantage, or are we just following a trend? The following text presents some arguments for working in 3D models.
Numerous nonlinearities can occur in a structural system. The RF-DYNAM Pro - Nonlinear Time History add-on module was developed in order to model them realistically in a dynamic analysis. To explain how the add-on module works, the procedure is described below with an example.
RFEM and RSTAB offer different options to model bored piles. One option is to display bored piles as single-valued supports or hinged columns. Another option is realistic modeling while taking the soil into account by means of applying a member elastic foundation. The two following examples will describe it in detail. However, pile base resistance, skin friction, and soil layers are not considered in this technical article.
The parts lists give information about which and how many parts are necessary for creating a building. They form the basis for identifying the needs and purchasing the components. Parts lists can be created in design modules, such as RF‑/STEEL EC3, RF‑/TIMBER Pro, and so on. Furthermore, a customized parts list can be created with the RF-COM/RS-COM interface.
In the case of plate structures, it is always necessary to consider realistic definition support conditions. Depending on the way of defining the flexibility of the supports, clear differences may occur in the results.
At first glance, the material list for masonry seems empty. The reason for this is that bricks and mortar can be used in many combinations, which would lead to a very long and unclear list. Therefore, it is necessary first to create a new material for masonry in order to consider these possible combinations in the calculation.
Input data and results can be clearly arranged in a printout report. The contents are listed in compliance with the program-specific definition. If the order of the contents does not correspond to your requirements, you can move the individual parts anywhere in the printout report.
The RFEM or RSTAB user interface can be customized. The previous posts describe how to create toolbars and menu bars. Thus, this post focuses on the load case drop‑down list. This drop‑down list allows you to switch between individual load cases, combinations, and module cases.
Damage equivalent factors depend on the respective components to be designed in RF‑/STEEL Fatigue Members, and they are explained in the corresponding standards. The following list shows an overview of the standards describing the calculation of the damage equivalent factors in detail.