- A wide range of available sections, such as rolled I-sections; channel sections; T-sections; angles; rectangular and circular hollow sections; round bars; symmetrical and asymmetrical, parametric I-, T-, and angle sections; built-up cross-sections (suitability for design depends on the selected standard)
- Design of general RSECTION cross-sections (depending on the design formats available in the respective standard); for example, equivalent stress design
- Design of tapered members (design method depending on the standard)
- Adjustment of the essential design factors and standard parameters is possible
- Flexibility due to detailed setting options for basis and extent of calculations
- Fast and clear results output for an immediate overview of the result distribution after the design
- Detailed output of the design results and essential formulas (comprehensible and verifiable result path)
- Numerical results clearly arranged in tables and graphical display of the results in the model
- Integration of the output into the RFEM/RSTAB printout report
- Design of tension, compression, bending, shear, torsion, and combined internal forces
- Tension design with consideration of a reduced section area (for example, hole weakening)
- Automatic classification of cross-sections to check local buckling
- Internal forces from the calculation with Torsional Warping (7 DOF) are taken into account by means of the equivalent stress check (currently not yet for the design standard ADM 2020).
- Design of cross-sections of Class 4 with effective cross-section properties according to EN 1993‑1‑5 (licenses for RSECTION and Effective Sections are required for the RSECTION cross-sections)
- Shear buckling check with consideration of transverse stiffeners
- Stability analyses for flexural buckling, torsional buckling, and flexural-torsional buckling under compression
- Lateral-torsional buckling analysis of the structural components subjected to moment loading
- Import of the effective lengths from the calculation using the Structure Stability add-on
- Graphical input and check of the defined nodal supports and effective lengths for stability analysis
- Depending on the standard, a choice between user-defined input of Mcr, analytical method from the standard, and use of internal eigenvalue solver
- Consideration of a shear panel and a rotational restraint when using the eigenvalue solver
- Graphical display of a mode shape if the eigenvalue solver was used
- Stability analysis of structural components with the combined compression and bending stress, depending on the design standard
- Comprehensible calculation of all necessary coefficients, such as interaction factors
- Alternative consideration of all effects for the stability analysis when determining internal forces in RFEM/RSTAB (second-order analysis, imperfections, stiffness reduction, possibly in combination with the Torsional Warping (7 DOF) add-on)
The parameters of the National Annexes (NA) to Eurocode 3 of the following countries are integrated:
-
DIN EN 1993-1-1/NA:2016-04 (Germany)
-
ÖNORM EN 1993-1-1/NA:2015-12 (Austria)
-
SN EN 1993-1-1/NA:2016-07 (Switzerland)
-
BDS EN 1993-1-1/NA:2015-10 (Bulgaria)
-
BS EN 1993-1-1/NA:2016-07 (United Kingdom)
-
CEN EN 1993-1-1/2015-06 (European Union)
-
CYS EN 1993-1-1/NA:2015-07 (Cyprus)
-
CSN EN 1993-1-1/NA:2016-06 (Czech Republic)
-
DS EN 1993-1-1/NA:2015-07 (Denmark)
-
ELOT EN 1993-1-1/NA:2017-01 (Greece)
-
EVS EN 1993-1-1/NA:2015-08 (Estonia)
-
HRN EN 1993-1-1/NA:2016-03 (Croatia)
-
I S. EN 1993-1-1/NA:2016-03 (Ireland)
-
ILNAS EN 1993-1-1/NA:2015-06 (Luxembourg)
-
IST EN 1993-1-1/NA:2015-11 (Iceland)
-
LST EN 1993-1-1/NA:2017-01 (Lithuania)
-
LVS EN 1993-1-1/NA:2015-10 (Latvia)
-
MS EN 1993-1-1/NA:2010-01 (Malaysia)
-
MSZ EN 1993-1-1/NA:2015-11 (Hungary)
-
NBN EN 1993-1-1/NA:2015-07 (Belgium)
-
NEN EN 1993-1-1/NA:2016-12 (Netherlands)
-
NF EN 1993-1-1/NA:2016-02 (France)
-
NP EN 1993-1-1/NA:2009-03 (Portugal)
-
NS EN 1993-1-1/NA:2015-09 (Norway)
-
PN EN 1993-1-1/NA:2015-08 (Poland)
-
SFS EN 1993-1-1/NA:2015-08 (Finland)
-
SIST EN 1993-1-1/NA:2016-09 (Slovenia)
-
SR EN 1993-1-1/NA:2016-04 (Romania)
-
SS EN 1993-1-1/NA:2019-05 (Singapore)
-
SS EN 1993-1-1/NA:2015-06 (Sweden)
-
STN EN 1993-1-1/NA:2015-10 (Slovakia)
-
TKP EN 1993-1-1/NA:2015-04 (Belarus)
-
UNE EN 1993-1-1/NA:2016-02 (Spain)
-
UNI EN 1993-1-1/NA:2015-08 (Italy)
- Simple definition of construction stages in the RFEM structure including visualization
- Adding, removing, modifying, and reactivating member, surface, and solid elements and their properties (for example, member and line hinges, degrees of freedom for supports, and so on)
- Automatic and manual combinatorics with load combinations in the individual construction stages (for example, to consider mounting loads, mounting cranes, and other loads)
- Consideration of nonlinear effects such as tension member failure or nonlinear supports
- Interaction with other add-ons, such as Nonlinear Material Behavior, Structure Stability, Form-Firnding, and so on.
- Display of results numerically and graphically for individual construction stages
- Detailed printout report with documentation of all structural and load data for each construction stage
Have you created the entire structure in RFEM? Very well, now you can assign the individual structural components and load cases to the corresponding construction stages. In each construction stage, you can modify release definitions of members and supports, for example.
You can thus model structural modifications, such as those that occur when bridge girders are successively grouted or when columns are settled. Then, assign the load cases created in RFEM to the construction stages as permanent or non-permanent loads.
Did you know that The combinatorics allows you to superimpose the permanent and non-permanent loads in load combinations. In this way, it is possible for you to determine the maximum internal forces of different crane positions or to consider temporary mounting loads available in one construction stage only.
If there are geometry differences arising between the ideal and the deformed structural system from the previous construction stage, they are compared in the program. The next construction stage is built on top of the stressed system from the previous construction stage. This calculation is nonlinear.
Was the calculation successful? Now you can view the results of the individual construction stages graphically and in tables in RFEM. Moreover, RFEM allows you to consider the construction stages in the combinatorics and include it in further design.
- Automatic consideration of masses from self-weight
- Direct import of masses from load cases or load combinations
- Optional definition of additional masses (nodal, linear, or surface masses, as well as inertia masses) directly in the load cases
- Optional neglect of masses (for example, mass of foundations)
- Combination of masses in different load cases and load combinations
- Preset combination coefficients for various standards (EC 8, SIA 261, ASCE 7,...)
- Optional import of initial states (for example, to consider prestress and imperfection)
- Structure Modification
- Consideration of failed supports or members/surfaces/solids
- Definition of several modal analyses (for example, to analyze different masses or stiffness modifications)
- Selection of mass matrix type (diagonal matrix, consistent matrix, unit matrix), including user-defined specification of translational and rotational degrees of freedom
- Methods for determining the number of mode shapes (user-defined, automatic - to reach effective modal mass factors, automatic - to reach the maximum natural frequency - only available in RSTAB)
- Determination of mode shapes and masses in nodes or FE mesh points
- Results of eigenvalue, angular frequency, natural frequency, and period
- Output of modal masses, effective modal masses, modal mass factors, and participation factors
- Masses in mesh points displayed in tables and graphics
- Visualization and animation of mode shapes
- Various scaling options for mode shapes
- Documentation of numerical and graphical results in printout report
In the modal analysis settings, you have to enter all data that are necessary for the determination of the natural frequencies. These are, for example, mass shapes and eigenvalue solvers.
The Modal Analysis add-on determines the lowest eigenvalues of the structure. Either you adjust the number of eigenvalues or let them determined automatically. Thus, you should reach either effective modal mass factors or maximum natural frequencies. Masses are imported directly from load cases and load combinations. In this case, you have the option to consider the total mass, load components in the global Z-direction, or only the load component in the direction of gravity.
You can manually define additional masses at nodes, lines, members, or surfaces. Furthermore, you can influence the stiffness matrix by importing axial forces or stiffness modifications of a load case or load combination.
In RFEM, you can use these three powerful eigenvalue solvers:
- Root of Characteristic Polynomial
- Method by Lanczos
- Subspace Iteration
RSTAB, on the other hand, provides you with these two eigenvalue solvers:
- Subspace Iteration
- Shifted inverse power method
The selection of the eigenvalue solver depends primarily on your model size.
As soon as the program has completed the calculation, the eigenvalues, natural frequencies and periods are listed. These result windows are integrated in the main program RFEM/RSTAB. You can find all mode shapes of the structure in tables and also have an option to display them graphically and to animate them.
All result tables and graphics are part of the RFEM/RSTAB printout report. In this way, you can ensure clearly arranged documentation. You can also export the tables to MS Excel.
The Dlubal structural analysis software does a lot of work for you. The input parameters, which are relevant for the selected standards, are suggested by the program in accordance with the rules. Furthermore, you can enter response spectra manually.
Load cases of the type Response Spectrum Analysis define the direction in which response spectra act and which eigenvalues of the structure are relevant for the analysis. In the spectral analysis settings, you can define details for the combination rules, damping (if applicable), and zero-period acceleration (ZPA).
Did you know that Equivalent static loads are generated separately for each relevant eigenvalue and excitation direction. These loads are saved in a load case of the Response Spectrum Analysis type and RFEM/RSTAB performs a linear static analysis.
The load cases of the type Response Spectrum Analysis contain the generated equivalent loads. First, the modal contributions have to be superimposed with the SRSS or CQC rule. In this case, you can use the signed results based on the dominant mode shape.
Afterwards, the directional components of earthquake actions are combined with the SRSS or the 100% / 30% rule.
- Automatic generation of FE analysis models: The add-on automatically creates a finite element model (FE) of the steel connection in the background.
- Consideration of all internal forces: The calculation and design checks include all internal forces (N, Vy, Vz, My, Mz, MT) and are not limited to planar loading.
- Automatic load transfer: All load combinations are automatically transferred to the FE analysis model of the connection. The loads are transferred directly from RFEM, so manual data input is not necessary.
- Efficient modeling: The add-on saves you time when modeling complex connection situations. You can also save the created FE analysis model and use it further for your own detailed analyses.
- Extensible library: An extensive and extensible library with predefined steel connection templates is available.
- Wide applicability: The add-on is suitable for connections of any type and shape, compatible with almost all rolled, welded, built-up, and thin-walled cross-sections.
- Selection of nodes in the RFEM model, automatic recognition and assignment of the members connected to the node
- Many predefined components available for easy input of typical connection situations (for example, end plates, cleats, fin plates)
- Universally applicable basic components (plates, welds, auxiliary planes) for entering complex connection situations
- No manual editing of the FE model required by the user, the essential calculation settings can be changed via the configuration settings
- Automatic adaptation of the connection geometry, even if the members are subsequently edited, due to the relative relation of the components to each other
- Parallel to the input, a plausibility check is carried out by the program to quickly detect missing input or collisions, for example
- Graphical display of the connection geometry that is updated in parallel with the input
The program supports you: It determines the bolt forces on the basis of the FE analysis model and evaluates them automatically. The add-on performs the standard-compliant design of bolt resistance for failure cases, such as tension, shear, hole bearing, and punching, and clearly displays all required coefficients.
Do you want to perform weld design? The welds are modeled as elastic-plastic surface elements, and their stresses are read out from the FE analysis model. The plasticity criteria is set in the way that they represent failure according to AISC J2-4, J2-5 (strength of welds), and J2-2 (strength of base metal). The design can be performed with the partial safety factors of the selected National Annex of EN 1993‑1‑8.
The plates in the connection are designed plastically by comparing the existing plastic strain to the allowable plastic strain. The default setting is 5% according to EN 1993‑1‑5, Annex C, but can be adjusted by user-defined specifications, as well as 5% for AISC 360.
You can display all essential results on the FE model. In this case, you can filter the results separately according to the respective components.
Furthemore, RFEM delivers you all design checks in a tabular form, including the display of the formulas used. If you wish, you can transfer the result tables to the RFEM printout report.
- 002108
- General
- Optimization & Cost / CO2 Emission Estimation for RFEM 6
- Optimization & Cost / CO2 Emission Estimation for RSTAB 9
- Artificial intelligence technology (AI): Particle swarm optimization (PSO)
- Structure optimization according to the minimum weight or deformation
- Use of any number of optimization parameters
- Specification of variable ranges
- Optimization of cross-sections and materials
- Parameter definition types
- Optimization | Ascending or Optimization | Descending
- Application of parametric models and blocks
- Code-based JavaScript parametrization of blocks
- Optimization taking into account the design results
- Tabular display of the best model mutations
- Real-time display of the model mutations in the optimization process
- Model cost estimation by specifying unit prices
- Determination of the global warming potential GWP when realizing the model by estimating the CO2 equivalent
- Specification of weight-, volume-, and area-based units (price and CO2e)