6688x
002542
2021-06-11

Rotational Stiffness of Non-Continuous Rotational Restraint

How is the rotational restraint stiffness calculated for a non-continuous rotational restraint (for example, purlins) in RF‑/STEEL EC3?


Answer:

The total rotational spring comprises several individual rotational springs, which are given in [1] as Equation 10.11.

In the case of a non-continuous rotational restraint by purlins, RF-/STEEL EC3 takes into account the rotational stiffness due to the connection stiffness CD,A, the rotational stiffness CD,C due to the bending stiffness of the available purlins, and also the rotational stiffness CD,B due to the section deformation, if activated.

Since the execution of the connection is unknown, the infinite value is set by default. The spring stiffnesses are considered as a reciprocal value 1/C, thus giving "infinitely" the result of spring stiffness = 0. If you know the rotational spring stiffness of the connection, you can specify this value manually.

The rotational restraint CD,C is determined from the bending stiffness according to the following formula:

The rotational stiffness CD,B due to the bending stiffness is determined according to the following formula; see [3] and [4]:

The attached example includes two design cases.

Case 1 was designed without taking into account the cross-section deformation. The total rotational spring stiffness is
CD = CD,C = 4,729 kNm/m

Case 2 was designed while taking into account the cross-section deformation. The total rotational spring stiffness is
CD = 72.02 kNm/m

Single spring CD,B = 73.14 kNm/m
Single spring CD,C = 4,729 kNm/m

Total spring:


Author

Mr. Flori is the customer support team leader and provides technical support for customers of Dlubal Software.

References
  1. European Committee for Standardization (CEN). (2010). Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures – Part 1‑1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings, EN 1993‑1‑1:2010‑12. Berlin: Beuth Verlag GmbH.
  2. European Committee for Standardization. (2010). Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures – Part 1‑3: General Rules – Supplementary Rules for Cold-Formed Members and Sheeting, EN 1993‑1‑3:2010‑12. Berlin: Beuth.
  3. Stroetmann, R. (2000). Zur Stabilität von in Querrichtung gekoppelten Biegeträgern. Stahlbau 69(5), 391-408. Berlin: Ernst & Sohn.
  4. Lindner, J., & Schmidt, J. S. (1982). Biegedrillknicken von I-Trägern unter Berücksichtigung wirklichkeitsnaher Lasteinleitung. Stahlbau 51, 257-263. Berlin: Ernst & Sohn.
Downloads


;