Moving loads can be generated easily with RF‑MOVE Surfaces. A library is available with load models as defined in Eurocode 1, Part 2. The input of step size, offsets at start and end, and the distance to a reference line make it possible for the user to generate user‑defined load models and influence the number of load cases generated. RF‑MOVE Surfaces generates load cases and, optionally, a result combination as an envelope of all results.
Not only do RF-/STEEL EC3 and RF-/TIMBER Pro perform cross-section designs and stability analyses, they allow you to perform serviceability limit state designs. For this, it is possible to relate the deformation to the undeformed initial system or to shifted members ends.
In order to represent the stiffness of the entire structure correctly, you can consider shear coupling between the ceiling and the downstand beam using the line release. This way, you can define a spring constant, thus avoiding the replacement system by using coupling members. The spring constant results from the shift modulus of the fastener, which can be determined according to EN 1995-1-1 or ANSI/AWC NDS, for example.
The national parameters of EN 1992‑1‑1 for each country can be exported from RF‑/CONCRETE, RF‑/CONCRETE Columns, and RF‑/FOUNDATION Pro. To do this, there are interfaces with MS Excel, OpenOffice, and CSV. By exporting the national parameters, you can edit them in (for example) MS Excel, and display possible differences between the individual National Annexes clearly (see the image).
In RF‑/TIMBER Pro, it is also possible to define the effective length for lateral-torsional buckling. The effective length for lateral-torsional buckling is then calculated according to EN 1995‑1‑1, Table 6.1. This option is useful especially for non-uniform load introduction.
As of the program version X.06 of the RF‑/TIMBER Pro, RF‑/TIMBER AWC, and RF‑/TIMBER CSA add‑on modules, notches and cross‑section reductions can be considered in the design. The procedure is as follows:
Various optimizations are available with program version x.06.1103. The RF-/FOUNDATION Pro add-on module has also been subjected to further development.
For structural components consisting of slabs, it is necessary to perform shear design on the locations with concentrated load introduction, applying the punching shear design rules according to Sect. 6.4 of EN 1992‑1‑1 [1]. The concentrated load introduction is present on the individual locations; for example, by columns, concentrated load, or nodal supports. In addition, the end of linear load introduction on slabs is also regarded as concentrated load introduction. For example, this includes wall ends, wall corners, and ends or corners of line loads and line supports. You can perform the punching shear design for floor slabs or foundations, considering the existing available plate topology about the designed node of punching shear. The punching shear design according to EN 1992‑1‑1 checks that the acting shear force vEd does not exceed the resistance vRd.
Due to the structural efficiency and economic benefits, dome-shaped roofs are frequently used for storehouses or stadiums. Even if the dome has the corresponding geometrical shape, it is not easy to estimate wind loads due to the Reynolds number effect. The external pressure coefficients (cpe) depend on the Reynolds numbers and on the slenderness of the structure. EN 1991‑1‑4 [1] can help you to estimate the wind loads on a dome. Based on this, the following article explains how to define a wind load in RFEM. Wind loads of the structure shown in Image 01 can be divided as follows: Wind Load on Wall, Wind Load on Dome.
Silos are used as large containers for storage of bulk materials such as agricultural products or source materials as well as intermediates of industrial production. The structural engineering of such structures requires a precise knowledge of the stresses due to particulate solids in the building structure. The standard EN 1991‑4 "Actions on Silos and Tanks" [1] provides the general principles and requirements for determining these actions.
As an alternative to the conventional automatic arrangement of surface reinforcement in RF-CONCRETE Surfaces, it is also possible to set it according to the individual requirements. This is advantageous for the creation of reinforcement drawings, for example, as the reinforcement areas can be clearly defined and dimensioned.
The RF‑PUNCH Pro add‑on module allows you to perform the punching shear design of floor slabs and foundation plates according to EN 1992‑1‑1. In the case of a floor slab, the basic control perimeter is applied according to 6.4.2 (1), EN 1992‑1‑1 [1] at a distance of 2d from the loaded area.
Downstand beams or T-beams are often used in reinforced concrete structures. In contrast to the previous representation and calculation options where, for example, a downstand beam was considered as a fixed support and the determined support reaction was applied to a separate member structure using a T-beam section, the ultimate structural FEA software like RFEM allow you to consider the structure as a whole and thus achieve a more precise analysis.
In the case of tension connections with cleats subjected to unilateral loading, the external members (side timber) are loaded by an additional bending moment due to the eccentric load distribution. However, this fact is not mentioned in EN 1995‑1‑1 and is considered in the National Annex to DIN EN 1995‑1‑1 by the reduction of the tensile strength. This reduction depends on the pull-off strength of the fasteners.
In the H - Roofs category, imposed loads have to be applied. These are usually the technician loads for construction and maintenance. Since there is no maintenance for snow, category H must not include both snow and imposed loads together. You can consider thi in the options for automatic combinations.
Basically, you can design the structural components made of cross-laminated timber in the RF-LAMINATE add-on module. Since the design is a pure elastic stress analysis, it is necessary to additionally consider the stability issues (flexural buckling and lateral-torsional buckling).
The following article describes a design using the equivalent member method according to [1] Section 6.3.2, performed on an example of a cross-laminated timber wall susceptible to buckling described in Part 1 of this article series. The buckling analysis will be performed as a compressive stress analysis with reduced compressive strength. For this, the instability factor kc is determined, which depends primarily on the component slenderness and the support type.
As an alternative to the equivalent member method, this article describes the possibility to determine the internal forces of a wall at risk of buckling according to the second-order analysis, taking imperfections into account, and to subsequently perform the cross-section design for bending and compression.