FAQ 004956 EN
New
25 February 2021
004956
Why do I get large differences for the design of a longitudinally stiffened buckling panel in comparison with the German and Austrian National Annex?
Answer
According to the national provision of ÖNORM EN 1993‑1‑5:2007, Section 4.5.3(3), it is possible to abandon the increase of σcr,c, allowed in the note, with respect to the elastic critical buckling stress σcr,sl of the longitudinal stiffener adjacent to the compression edge as this results in very conservative results with regard to the resulting reduction factor ρc for the buckling analysis according to ÖNORM EN 1993‑1‑5, Section 4.5.4(1), Equation 4.13. Image 01 shows an example of a longitudinally stiffened buckling panel, designed according to the Austrian National Annex.
Image 01 - Design According to Austrian National Annex
In DIN EN 1993‑1‑5, the note given in Section 4.5.3(3) applies, so it results in the following difference, see Image 02.
Image 02 - Design According to German National Annex
Keywords
Longitudinal Longitudinal stiffener Stiffened Panel Difference
Contact us
Did you find your question?
If not, contact us via our free e-mail, chat, or forum support, or send us your question via the online form.
Recommended Events
Eurocode 3 | Steel structures according to DIN EN 1993-1-1
Online Training 6 May 2021 8:30 AM - 12:30 PM CEST
Stability Design in Steel Construction with RFEM and RSTAB
Webinar 1 December 2020 2:00 PM - 2:45 PM CET
Designing Cold-Formed Steel Sections According to Eurocode 3
Webinar 30 April 2020 3:00 PM - 3:45 PM CEST
Membrane Structures with Wind Loads From CFD Wind Simulation
Webinar 24 March 2020 3:00 PM - 4:15 PM CET
Videos
RFEM 5 Tutorial for Students | 015 Dynamics: Response Spectrum Analysis | Input Data
Length 9:17 min
Models to Download
Knowledge Base Articles

New
CSA S16:19 Stability Considerations and the New Annex O.2
Structure stability is not a new phenomenon when referring to steel design. The Canadian steel design standard CSA S16 and the most recent 2019 release is no exception.
Screenshots
Product Features Articles

SHAPE-THIN determines the effective cross-sections according to EN 1993-1-3 and EN 1993-1-5 for cold-formed sections. You can optionally check the geometric conditions for the applicability of the standard specified in EN 1993‑1‑3, Section 5.2.
The effects of local plate buckling are considered according to the method of reduced widths and the possible buckling of stiffeners (instability) is considered for stiffened sections according to EN 1993-1-3, Section 5.5.
As an option, you can perform an iterative calculation to optimize the effective cross-section.
You can display the effective cross-sections graphically.
Read more about designing cold-formed sections with SHAPE-THIN and RF-/STEEL Cold-Formed Sections in this technical article: Design of a Thin-Walled, Cold-Formed C-Section According to EN 1993-1-3.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
-
Why are my steel members not being designed for stability in RF-STEEL AISC?
- My section is classified as Class 4 and non-designable in RF-/STEEL CSA. However, my manual calculation shows a different class. Why the difference?
- Can the properties, such as B. the cross -section or the surface thickness as well as the material of a surface of an existing element for a new element?
- I have defined temperature loads, strain loads, or a precamber. As soon as I modify stiffnesses, the deformations are no longer plausible.
- I am trying to manually check the deformations from the CRANEWAY add-on module. However, I obtain great deviations. How to explain the differences?
- What should be considered when using a failure of columns under tension in the RF‑/DYNAM Pro – Equivalent Loads add-on module?
- Why is there no stability analysis displayed in the results despite the activation of the stability analysis in RF‑/STEEL EC3?
- How can I model and design a crane runway girder with Dlubal Software?
- Is it possible to set user-defined values when viewing solid stress results?
- How can I perform the stability analysis in RF‑/STEEL EC3 for a flat bar supported on edges, such as 100/5? Although the cross-section is rotated by 90° in RFEM/RSTAB, it is displayed as lying flat in RF‑/STEEL EC3.
Customer Projects
Associated Products
PLATE-BUCKLING 8.xx - Stand-Alone
Stand-Alone Program
Plate buckling analysis of rectangular plates with or without stiffeners
900.00 USD