Calculation of Effective Cross-Section Properties
Prior to the analysis of steel cross‑sections, the cross‑sections are classified according to EN 1993‑1‑1, Chap. 5.5, with respect to their resistance and rotation capacity. Thus, the individual cross‑section parts are analysed and assigned to Classes 1 to 4. The cross‑section classes are subsequently determined and usually assigned to the highest class of cross‑section parts. If plastic resistance is to be applied to further design of cross‑sections of Class 1 and Class 2, you can analyse the elastic resistance of cross-sections as of Class 3. In the case of Class 4 cross‑sections, local buckling already occurs before reaching the elastic moment. In order to take this effect into account, you can use effective widths. This article describes the calculation of the effective cross‑section properties in more detail.
In the first calculation step, the stress distribution is determined on a gross cross‑section. According to EN 1993‑1‑5, Chap. 4.4 , the buckling value kσ of the cross‑section parts subjected to compression can be determined by using the existing stresses. On the basis of the slenderness ratio at buckling λp and the resulting reduction factor ρ, the effective width beff of the cross‑section part is calculated. The resulting reduction is deducted from the entire cross‑section. This gives you the result of new cross‑section dimensions and properties.
At this point, the calculation is not yet complete. There is a further iteration step, where the new stress distribution with the existing internal forces is calculated on the basis of the reduced cross‑section. The following must be considered:
- By reducing the cross‑section, the center of gravity is shifted. The possible acting normal forces generate an additional moment at the distance of the new center of gravity to the old one.
- The cross‑section reduction may also have an effect on the rotation of the major axes. In such cases, the deviation moment Iyz must be taken into account.
After determining the stresses, the slenderness of the cross‑section parts subjected to compression is checked again. If more reductions are necessary, the iterative process continues as long as no significant cross‑section modifications occur. Only then is it possible to perform the corresponding designs of the effective cross‑sections.
The quick determination of effective cross‑sections performed initially may easily become a time‑consuming calculation due to several required iterations. By using the powerful program SHAPE‑THIN as well as the add‑on modules for structural steel analysis and design, you can easily avoid such difficulties.
Do you have questions or need advice?
Contact our free e-mail, chat, or forum support or find various suggested solutions and useful tips on our FAQ page.
Models to Download
Knowledge Base Articles
Product Features Articles
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
- I design a cross-section created in the SHAPE‑THIN program by using the RF‑STEEL EC3 add-on module, but the program shows the error message "ER006 Invalid type of c/t-part for cross-section of type General." What can I do?
- I would expect the results from my load combination (CO) set to a linear analysis to equal the summation of the results from my load cases (LC) also set to a linear analysis. Why do the results not match?
- A rigid member should only be able to absorb tensile forces or only compressive forces. What are the options for considering these nonlinearities in the calculation?
- How can I perform a stability analysis for a tapered member?
- How can I consider a hole in the web that is only near the support? The parameterization can only be applied to the centrally arranged holes with the same distance.
- Are the Dlubal Software programs suitable for the analysis and design of hydraulic steel structures?
- How do I display the nodal displacements graphically?
- I would like to perform a stability analysis of the upper flange in a long truss. What is the best way to proceed?
- What are the StandardID and AnnexID of various National Annexes for the processing using the COM interface?
- In connection with the calculation according to the large deformation analysis, I get significantly smaller deformations than for the calculation according to the linear static or second-order analysis. How is this possible?
Structural engineering software for finite element analysis (FEA) of planar and spatial structural systems consisting of plates, walls, shells, members (beams), solids and contact elements
The structural engineering software for design of frame, beam and truss structures, performing linear and nonlinear calculations of internal forces, deformations, and support reactions