# Design of Concrete Columns Subjected to Axial Compression with RF-CONCRETE Members

## Technical Article on the Topic Structural Analysis Using Dlubal Software

### Technical Article

This article deals with rectilinear elements of which the cross-section is subjected to axial compressive force. The purpose of this article is to show how very many parameters defined in the Eurocodes for concrete column calculation are considered in the RFEM structural analysis software.

#### What is axial compression?

A section of a structural element is stressed by axial compression when the forces acting on one side of the section are reduced at the section's center of gravity to a single force N. Thus, the normal force N is perpendicular to the cross-section and directed towards the cross-section. In contrast to combined bending, this stress is never encountered in practice, because a real column is always subjected to either the asymmetry of the loading or to imperfections in the column construction, as can be seen in this technical article.

#### Slenderness Criterion for Isolated Elements

It is assumed that the second order effects (imperfections, asymmetry, etc.) can be neglected if the 'element is only stressed by a normal compression force NEd and if the' slenderness criterion is fulfilled.

Slenderness Criterion

λ < λlim

λ ... slenderness coefficient

λlim ... Limiting slenderness

#### Slenderness and Effective Length According to EN 1992-1-1

Slenderness Coefficient

$$λ = l0i$$

 λ slenderness coefficient l0 effective length = kcr ⋅ l i radius of gyration of uncracked concrete section kcr effective length factor = 0.5 ⋅ √[(1 + k1 / (0.45 + k1)) ⋅ (1 + k2 / (0.45 + k2))] according to 5.8.3.2(3) formula (5.15) l free length k1, k2 flexibility coefficients at both ends of element

#### Limiting Slenderness According to EN 1992-1-1

Limiting slenderness

λlim = (20 ⋅ A ⋅ B ⋅ C) / √n according to 5.8.3.1(1) formula (5.13N)

A = 1 / (1 + 0.2 φef) = 0.7 if φef is unknown

B = √(1 + 2 ⋅ ω) = 1.1 if ω is unknown

C = 1.7 - rm = 0.7 if rm is unknown

n = NEd / (Ac ⋅ fcd) ... relative normal force

φef ... effective creep coefficient

ω ... Mechanical reinforcement ratio

rm ... moment ratio

NEd ... design value of acting axial force

Ac ... Total area of pure concrete section

fcd ... Design value of the compressive strength of concrete

#### Compressive Stress in Steel

The concrete shrinkage under axial compression is limited to εc2 in the case of the σ-ε parabola-rectangle diagram. By static friction of concrete and steel, the shortening is identical for the reinforcement, and we can deduce its stress.

Stress in Reinforcement

$$σs = fyd if εc2 > εudEs · εc2 otherwise$$

 σs stress in reinforcement fyd design yield strength of reinforcing steel = fyk / γs εc2 relative compression strain for maximum stress Es modulus of elasticity fyk characteristic yield strength γs partial safety factor of steel εud design value of limit deformation = fyd / Es

#### Compressive Stress in Concrete

Stress in concrete

fcd = αcc ⋅ fck / γc

αcc ... factor considering long-term actions on compressive strength

fck ... characteristic compressive strength of concrete

γc ... partial safety coefficient relating to concrete

#### Dimensions of the Concrete Cross-Section

The force that can be balanced by the concrete cross-section corresponds to its maximum load-bearing capacity for compression, which depends directly on its section and its design resistance.

Equilibrium force of concrete

Fc = Ac ⋅ fcd

The reinforcement will balance the rest of the axial compressive load.

Equilibrium force of reinforcement

Fs = NEd - Fc

From these two equilibrium equations, it is possible to deduce the concrete cross-section to be designed, then that of the reinforcing steel.

Area of concrete cross-section

Ac ≥ NEd / (fcd + As / Ac ⋅ σs)

As = Fs / σs ... Reinforcement area

#### Application of the Theory Using RF-CONCRETE Members

In this article, we will analyze the results obtained automatically for the reinforcement calculation. As the objective is also to determine the concrete cross-section to be designed, the RFEM basis model will have a specified width and an unknown height greater than or equal to the width.

We will consider the following parameters:

• Permanent loads: Ng = 1 390 kN
• Variable loads: Nq = 1,000 kN
• Column length: l = 2.1 m
• Rectangular cross-section to be determined: width b = 40 cm / unknown height ≥ 40 cm
• The column's self-weight can be ignored.
• Column not integrated into bracing.
• Concrete strength class: C25/30
• Steel: S 500 A for inclined graph
• Diameter of longitudinal reinforcement: ϕ = 20 mm
• Diameter of transverse reinforcement: ϕt = 8 mm
• Concrete cover: 3 cm

#### Material Properties

Design value of the compressive strength of concrete

fcd = 1 ⋅ 25 / 1.5 = 16.7 MPa

Relative compression strain for maximum stress

εc2= 2‰

Design yield strength of reinforcing steel

fyd = 500 / 1.15 = 435 MPa

Limit strain in reinforcement

εud = fyd / Es = 435 / (2 ⋅ 105) = 2.17‰

Stress in reinforcement

σs = 2 ⋅ 105 ⋅ 0.002 = 400 MPa as εc2 < εud

In order to check the material settings on RF-CONCRETE Members, Figure 02 shows the expected stresses and strains for the concrete and the required reinforcement.

#### Ultimate Limit State

NEd = 1.35 ⋅ Ng + 1.5 ⋅ Nq

NEd = 1.35 ⋅ 1390 + 1.5 ⋅ 1000 = 3.38 MN

#### Second-Order Effects not Taken into Account in ULS

In our model, in order to be able to apply a load correctly at the column head, we modeled a member only embedded at the base and free at the head. However, we want to consider the column being fixed at the head to some beams by assuming that the column is less stiff than the beams. We can then consider that the member is fixed at both ends. Thus, in theory, the flexibility coefficients should be zero for perfect restraint. However, in practice, perfect restraints do not exist. The minimum value to be considered for the flexibility coefficients is therefore: k1 ou k2 = 0.1.

Effective length factor

kcr = 0.5 ⋅ (1 + 0.1 / (0.45 + 0.1)) = 0.59

Image 04 shows the possibility of setting the effective length factor for a member type element in RFEM.

Since the height of the cross-section has to be determined, it is assumed that h > b, and thus, that the radius of gyration of a rectangular cross-section is more governing for the small width.

Radius d ' governing inertia in the plane parallel to the width b = 40 cm

iz = b / √12

Slenderness

λz = (0.59 ⋅ 2.1 ⋅ √12) / 0.40 = 10.73 m

Image 05 shows the slenderness values determined for the member after calculation in RFEM Table 4.10.

To verify our slenderness, we manually determine the limiting slenderness by assuming h = b.

Limiting slenderness

n = 3.38 / (0.40² ⋅ 16.7) = 1.26

λlim = 20 ⋅ 0.7 ⋅ 1.1 ⋅ 0.7 / √1.26 = 9.6 m

λz > λlim → The condition is not fulfilled.

However, we are still going to calculate in centric compression because, the 'deviation being small, we note later that' with the determination of the real height of section, the condition will be respected.

#### Real Height to Be Calculated

In order to determine the real height h of the cross-section, the following hypothesis can be adopted for the reinforcement ratio to be considered: As / Ac = 1%. We can then deduce the real cross-section to be designed and its height as a function of the stress in the reinforcement and the width of the cross-section b.

Area of concrete cross-section

Ac ≥ 3.38 / (16.7 + 400 / 100) = 0.163 m²

Cross-Section depth

Ac = b ⋅ h → h ≥ 0.163 / 0.4 = 0.41 m

The assumption h > b made for the slenderness calculation is correct, and we can retain a section height by choosing a multiple of 5 cm; that is to say, h = 45 cm.

Image 06 shows the steps to automatically determine the height of the rectangular cross-section in RF-CONCRETE Members, using the "Optimize" function.

Equilibrium force of concrete

Fc = 0.40 ⋅ 0.45 ⋅ 16.7 = 3 MN

Equilibrium force of reinforcement

Fs= 3.376 - 3 = 0.38 MN

We deduce the corresponding reinforcement area:

Reinforcement area

As = 0.38 / 400 ⋅ 104 = 9.5 cm²

Having set up steels with a diameter of 20 mm in RF-CONCRETE Members, the reinforcements provided and determined automatically by the module are 4 members, with a distribution in the corners, as requested, i.e. 1 HA 20 per corner. Therefore, the result of the cross-sectional area d ' and the following:

As = 4 ⋅ 3.142 = 12.57 cm²

Mechanical reinforcement ratio

ω = (As ⋅ fyd) / (Ac ⋅ fcd) = 12.57 ⋅ 435 / (40 ⋅ 45 ⋅ 16.7) = 0.182

Final check of limiting slenderness as h > b

n = 3.38 / (0.40 ⋅ 0.45 ⋅ 16.7) = 1.125

B = √(1 + 2 ⋅ ω) = 1.17

λlim = 20 ⋅ 0.7 ⋅ 1.17 ⋅ 0.7 / √1.125 = 10.81 m

λz < λlim → The slenderness criterion is fulfilled.

#### Application in Other Add-On Modules

The RF-CONCRETE Columns add-on module also allows for determining the reinforcement of a structural element subjected to axial compression. A technical article detailing the differences between RF-CONCRETE Members and RF-CONCRETE Columns can be found here.

#### M.Eng. Milan Gérard

Sales & Technical Support

Milan Gérard works at the Paris site. He is responsible for sales and provides technical support to our French-speaking customers.

#### Reference

 [1] Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures - Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings; EN 1992-1-1:2011-01 [2] Roux, J. (2007). Pratique de l'eurocode 2 - Guide d'application. Paris: Groupe Eyrolles.

Write Comment...

Write Comment...

• Views 1150x
• Updated 18 January 2022

Do you have further questions or need advice? Contact us via phone, email, or chat or find suggested solutions and useful tips on our FAQ page available 24/7.

NCSEA Structural Engineering Summit

Conference 15 February 2022 - 16 February 2022

Eurocode 2 | Concrete Structures According to DIN EN 1992-1-1

Online Training 25 February 2022 8:30 AM - 12:30 PM CET

2022 NASCC: The Steel Conference

Conference 23 March 2022 - 25 March 2022

International Mass Timber Conference

Conference 12 April 2022 - 14 April 2022

Structures Congress 2022

Conference 21 April 2022 - 22 April 2022

Webinar 20 January 2022 2:00 PM - 3:00 PM EST

Consider Construction Stages in RFEM 6

Webinar 13 January 2022 2:00 PM - 3:00 PM CET

Introduction to the New RFEM 6

Webinar 11 November 2021 2:00 PM - 3:00 PM EST

Glass Design with Dlubal Software

Webinar 8 June 2021 2:00 PM - 2:45 PM

Blast Time History Analysis in RFEM

Webinar 13 May 2021 2:00 PM - 3:00 PM EST

Timber Beam and Surface Structures | Part 2: Design

Webinar 11 May 2021 2:00 PM - 3:00 PM

Plate and Shell Buckling Utilizing Dlubal Software

Webinar 30 March 2021 2:00 PM - 2:45 PM

Webinar 10 March 2021 2:00 PM - 3:00 PM EST

The Most Common User Errors With RFEM and RSTAB

Webinar 4 February 2021 2:00 PM - 3:00 PM CET

Webinar 19 January 2021 2:00 PM - 3:00 PM EST

Dlubal Info Day Online | 15 December 2020

Webinar 15 December 2020 9:00 AM - 4:00 PM CET

Webinar 1 December 2020 2:00 PM - 2:45 PM CET

FEA Troubleshooting and Optimization in RFEM

Webinar 11 November 2020 2:00 PM - 3:00 PM EST

Length 1:14 min

Length 0:51 min

Length 0:51 min

Length 2:50:30 min

Length 0:37 min

Length 0:51 min

Length 0:56 min

Length 1:02 min

Length 0:24 min

Length 0:50 min

Length 1:44 min

Length 0:51 min

Length 1:14 min

Length 1:00 min

Length 0:34 min