Wind direction plays a crucial role in shaping the outcomes of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations and the structural design of buildings and infrastructures. It is a determining factor in assessing how wind forces interact with structures, influencing the distribution of wind pressures, and consequently, the structural responses. Understanding the impact of wind direction is essential for developing designs that can withstand varying wind forces, ensuring the safety and durability of structures. Simplified, the wind direction helps in fine-tuning CFD simulations and guiding structural design principles for optimal performance and resilience against wind-induced effects.
This article describes how a flat slab of a residential building is modeled in RFEM 6 and designed according to Eurocode 2. The plate is 24 cm thick and is supported by 45/45/300 cm columns at distances of 6.75 m in both the X and Y directions (Image 1). The columns are modeled as elastic nodal supports by determining the spring stiffness based on the boundary conditions (Image 2). C35/45 concrete and B 500 S (A) reinforcing steel are selected as the materials for the design.
In RFEM, it is possible to display the resultant of a section or release. This article explains which part of the sectional area is affected. The easiest way would be to refer the resultant to a cut face of the surface. However, since a section may run through several surfaces with different local coordinate systems, determination by means of a cut face is not possible.
If you want to consider guide objects in the overall view (F8 key or double-click on the mouse wheel) or, for example, in a particular direction of the views, you can enable this option in the settings of the particular guide objects (guidelines, background layers, line grids).
In the RF-/TIMBER Pro, RF-/TIMBER AWC, and RF-/TIMBER CSA add-on modules, you can consider the resulting deformation of a member or set of members. In addition to the local directions y and z, you have the option "R." This allows you to compare the total deflection of a girder to the limit values given in the standards.
You can color the surfaces in the direction of the local z‑axis using the indicated option in the Display Navigator. By default, the side lying in the negative z-direction is colored red and the side lying in the positive z-direction is colored blue.
Before creating a structural model, every user gives thought to the boundary parameters of the system and how best to represent the model. Special attention should be paid to the orientation of the global coordinate system. In engineering, the global Z‑axis is usually oriented downwards (in the direction of the dead load), while it tends to be upwards in architecture. These differences can often lead to complications during modeling; for example, when you replace global models or DXF layers.
The shear force resistance VRd,c without computational shear force reinforcement according to 6.2.2 of EN 1992-1-1 [1] or 10.3.3 of DIN 1045-1 [2] is calculated depending on the longitudinal reinforcement ratio. If the required longitudinal reinforcement from the bending design is used for the calculation of VRd,c, this leads to an underestimation of the shear force resistance without shear reinforcement in the vicinity of the hinged end supports. In contrast to the shear force, the required bending reinforcement decreases in the direction of the support. Furthermore, the actually inserted longitudinal reinforcement usually deviates significantly from the required bending reinforcement in the end support area (for example, in the case of non-staggered beam reinforcement).
In RF‑CONCRETE Surfaces, the design of the surface reinforcement is done by means of a freely definable reinforcement mesh. In RF‑CONCRETE Surfaces, you can display the reinforcement direction by activating the reinforcement arrow that represents it.
For structural reasons, it may be necessary for a base plate not to be set centrically on a foundation. Therefore, an eccentric arrangement of the base plate is possible in RF‑/JOINTS Steel - Column Base by entering the parameters for the respective direction in Window 1.4.
In theory, an ideal gas consists of freely moving mass particles without extension in a volume space. In this space, each particle moves at a speed in one direction. The collision of one particle with another particle or the volume limitations leads to a deflection and a change in the speed of the particles.
The following structure is covered as Example IV.10 in [1] "Comment on Eurocode 3". For a support with a linearly varying cross‑section, a sufficient ultimate limit state design (cross‑section check and stability analysis) is to be performed. Due to the unequal structural component, it is necessary to perform the stability analysis (from the main support direction) using the method according to Section 6.3.4, or alternatively, according to the second‑order analysis.
Composite beams in a three-dimensional analysis are usually connected with orthotropic plates. In that case, the longitudinal direction of the plate stiffness is defined by a main beam and the transverse direction by an orthotropic plate. The stiffness of the plate in the longitudinal direction is set almost to zero. This article explains the determination of stiffnesses in the orthotropic plate.
You can now use axial expansion joints in RF‑PIPING. These are applied to absorb movements of extension and compression in the axis direction due to the thermal expansions of the piping.
There are two ways to specify eccentric nodal loads in RF-/FE-LTB. First, the nodal load has to be applied in the right direction. Then, you can assign either the resulting torsional moment or the eccentricity.
If nodal supports should have an effect in certain directions only, you can define failure. Here is an example of a single‑span beam, of which the right support can only absorb positive vertical loads. The load comprise vertical suction load and horizontal load. However, there are 2 failure options: 1) Failure if negative PZ' 2) Failure all if negative PZ' The difference is illustrated in the graphic.
Nodal supports are usually defined with regard to the global axis system. However, it is sometimes necessary to rotate the nodal support. For example, for a floor slab with a pile foundation. For geological reasons, the piles do not rest in the ground vertically, but in an inclined position. Each end point of the piles has a nodal support that can only absorb forces along the pile foundation direction. Therefore, rotating the nodal support is required. Various options for this are described in previous posts.
When modeling arc-shaped members, the problem shown in the figure may occur. It seems as if the member cross‑section is twisted or the load applied on the local z‑axis changes direction. How does this come about?
If you consider rotating the structure shown in the figure around the global Y‑axis, this might be not straightforward. In order to achieve better handling, the axis is always locked in the direction of your view. In the case of very high structures, it may be helpful to rotate the view about 90 degrees in the viewing direction.
Shoring braces usually obtain the "tension member" type. There are a few specifics to note because in the case of uniform, symmetrical structures and solely vertical loads, an error message often appears as follows: "The model is unstable in node No. 20. Free movement around Y-direction."
When defining nodal loads, you can rotate the load using several simple options: ~ Rotation by angle around the global coordinate axes in a specific order, ~ Alignment with a user-defined coordinate system, ~ Direction to a particular node, ~ Alignment by means of two nodes, ~ In the direction of a member/line.
A new direction for temperature load is available in RFEM. Now, it is also possible to apply temperature loads with radial load distribution on a structure. The load is defined using an outer and an inner node, and an axis around which the radial load is applied.
When calculating the surface reinforcement in RF-CONCRETE Surfaces, the result values for both surface sides +/- z are available. If you are unsure which side of a surface is the positive or the negative z side, you can hide the local coordinate system of each surface in the RFEM Project Navigator - Display under "Model" → "Surfaces" → "Surface Axis Systems x,y,z". In the case of complex structures, this can quickly become confusing. Displaying multiple axis systems makes it difficult to recognize the incorrect direction of a surface, for example (see the figure on the top).
It is often necessary to adjust the FE mesh of surface elements to the geometric structure. RFEM provides various options for this. For example, the FE axis can be rotated around a point, aligned in the direction of a point, or oriented to a user-defined coordinate system. Another option is the direction parallel to a line, and in this case in particular, it is possible to enter or select several lines.
For the reduction of loads generated in RF‑MOVE Surfaces, you can consider the influence surfaces of a selected point. The influence surfaces are determined by RF-INFLUENCE. This procedure is useful in cases where only unfavorably acting loads should be considered. Depending on the unfavorable action, you should select the positive or negative direction.