14397x
001625
2020-02-28

Lateral-Torsional Buckling in Timber Construction | Theory

Slender bending beams that have a large h/w ratio and are loaded parallel to the minor axis tend to have stability issues. This is due to the deflection of the compression chord.

The beam has a lateral displacement with simultaneous rotation (see Image 01). This is called flexural-torsional buckling or lateral buckling. Similar to flexural buckling, where a member buckles suddenly when the Euler load is reached, the compression chord shifts from a critical lateral buckling load during flexural-torsional buckling. This results in a critical bending moment Mcrit, which results in a critical stress for lateral buckling σcrit.

Symbols used:
L ... beam length
E ... modulus of elasticity
G ... shear modulus
Iz ... second moment of area around weak axis
IT ... torsional moment of inertia
Iω ... warping constant
az ... distance of load application from shear center
e ... distance of member elastic foundation from shear center
KG ... elastic rotational spring on support in Nmm
KΘ ... elastic rotational restraint in N
Ky ... elastic member foundation in N/mm²

Analytical Determination of Mcrit

To determine the bending moment where a beam becomes unstable, the engineer can use analytical solutions from the literature, but these are limited in their application. In [1], the following equation is derived for a single-span beam with lateral and torsional restraints and hinged at both sides, with a constant bending moment and load application at the shear center.

In the case of cross-sections not free to warp (for example, a narrow rectangular cross-section in timber construction), the warping stiffness can be set to zero; thus, the part in the parentheses is omitted.

Since there are many more cases in structural analysis than those mentioned above, correction factors have been introduced in order to take into account, for example, deviating moment distributions, support situations, and a different load application. For this, the length of the beam is modified with the factors and results in an effective length lef. This is described in [2], among others, as follows.

az is the distance of the load application from the shear center.

If the load acts on the bottom side of the beam, you have to consider az with negative signs. The coefficients a1 and a2 are shown in Image 03.

The different systems have to be understood as follows:

  1. Single-span beam with lateral and torsional restraints and hinged at both sides
  2. Restrained beam
  3. Cantilever with lateral and torsional restraint at the free end
  4. Beam fixed on both sides
  5. Single-span beam with restraint on one side
  6. Two-span beam
  7. Continuous beam with lateral and torsional restraint - inner span
  8. Continuous beam with lateral and torsional restraint - outer span

The standards suggest the lateral buckling design according to the equivalent member method. You have to calculate the critical moment with the 5% quantile values of the stiffnesses. Thus, the following results for timber structures:

The critical bending stress results in:

If you want to consider an elastic rotational spring (for example, resulting from the flexibility of the lateral and torsional restraint) on the support, an elastic rotational restraint (for example, from trapezoidal sheeting), or an elastic member elastic foundation (for example, from bracings), you can extend the previous equation as follows [2].


where


If the rotational spring KG at the support is considered as infinitely stiff, the result is α = 1. The elastic rotational restraint KΘ is generally not considered in timber construction, since there are no studies. Thus, the parameter KΘ is included in the equation with the value 0. The elastic member elastic foundation Ky, resulting from a bracing or a shear panel, has a favorable effect on the lateral buckling behavior of a beam. However, please note that the previous equation has a limited application. Strictly speaking, it is only valid if there is a deflection in a large sinusoidal arc. If the member foundation is too rigid, this is no longer the case because the mode shape has several arcs along the beam. There is currently no definition of when the extended formula with α and β becomes invalid.

Finding the solution for such eigenvalue issues in a skillful way will be described with different examples in the next article.


Author

Mr. Rehm is responsible for developing products for timber structures, and he provides technical support for customers.

Links
References
  1. Timoshenko, S.; Gere, J. M.; Theory of Elastic Stability, 2. Auflage. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1961
  2. National Annex - Eurocode 5: Design of Timber Structures - Part 1-1: General - Common Rules and Rules for Buildings; DIN EN 1995‑1‑1/NA:2013‑08