Champagne Bar - Goodwood Racecourse, United Kingdom
Customer Project
![[DE] CP 001185 | Champagne Bar - Goodwood Racecourse, United Kingdom](/-/media/Images/netgenium/thumbnails/2/9/6/4/9/2964977/2964977.png?la=en&mw=280&mlid=1B276AD81B064D74B359A0DA1E3DB392&hash=0DDB728D27880942553A7C211DADDBEC28592689)
-
01
Membrane Structure | Champagne Bar - Goodwood Racecourse, United Kingdom (© www. Leichtonline.com)
-
01
RFEM Model with Form-Finding Internal Forces (© www. leichtonline.com)
-
01
Champagne Bar - Goodwood Racecourse, United Kingdom (© Lanaomo)
-
01
Champagne Bar Aerial View (© Tayio Europe)
-
01
Close-up View (© ptprojects)
-
01
Champagne Bar Roof Underside View (© ptprojects)
-
01
Membrane Structure with Cutting Patterns
-
02
RFEM Model with Form-Finding Internal Forces (© www. leichtonline.com)
-
02
Membrane Structure | Champagne Bar - Goodwood Racecourse, United Kingdom (© www. Leichtonline.com)
-
02
Champagne Bar - Goodwood Racecourse, United Kingdom (© Lanaomo)
-
02
Champagne Bar Aerial View (© Tayio Europe)
-
02
Close-up View (© ptprojects)
-
02
Champagne Bar Roof Underside View (© ptprojects)
-
03
Champagne Bar - Goodwood Racecourse, United Kingdom (© Lanaomo)
-
03
Membrane Structure | Champagne Bar - Goodwood Racecourse, United Kingdom (© www. Leichtonline.com)
-
03
RFEM Model with Form-Finding Internal Forces (© www. leichtonline.com)
-
03
Champagne Bar Aerial View (© Tayio Europe)
-
03
Close-up View (© ptprojects)
-
03
Champagne Bar Roof Underside View (© ptprojects)
-
04
Champagne Bar Aerial View (© Tayio Europe)
-
04
Membrane Structure | Champagne Bar - Goodwood Racecourse, United Kingdom (© www. Leichtonline.com)
-
04
RFEM Model with Form-Finding Internal Forces (© www. leichtonline.com)
-
04
Champagne Bar - Goodwood Racecourse, United Kingdom (© Lanaomo)
-
04
Close-up View (© ptprojects)
-
04
Champagne Bar Roof Underside View (© ptprojects)
-
05
Close-up View (© ptprojects)
-
05
Membrane Structure | Champagne Bar - Goodwood Racecourse, United Kingdom (© www. Leichtonline.com)
-
05
RFEM Model with Form-Finding Internal Forces (© www. leichtonline.com)
-
05
Champagne Bar - Goodwood Racecourse, United Kingdom (© Lanaomo)
-
05
Champagne Bar Aerial View (© Tayio Europe)
-
05
Champagne Bar Roof Underside View (© ptprojects)
-
06
Champagne Bar Roof Underside View (© ptprojects)
-
06
Membrane Structure | Champagne Bar - Goodwood Racecourse, United Kingdom (© www. Leichtonline.com)
-
06
RFEM Model with Form-Finding Internal Forces (© www. leichtonline.com)
-
06
Champagne Bar - Goodwood Racecourse, United Kingdom (© Lanaomo)
-
06
Champagne Bar Aerial View (© Tayio Europe)
-
06
Close-up View (© ptprojects)
The company LEICHT was awarded the design phase for the Champagne Bar’s new roof located at the Goodwood Racecourse. The planning steps included the form-finding process, the membrane and the supporting steel structure approval and design, as well as the membrane and the cable cutting patterns.
| Owner |
Tayio Europe GmbH www.taiyo-europe.com |
| Architect |
Hopkins Architects Ltd. www.hopkins.co.uk |
| Overall Planning of Steel Structure, Membranes and Cables |
LEICHT Structural engineering and specialist consulting GmbH www.leichtonline.com |
Model Parameters
Model
The canopy consists of a prestressed PVC membrane suspended between two masts while anchored to the ground at the edges. The prestress horizontal forces are resisted by the supporting steel structure. The membrane’s prestress is applied through the masts’ opposite displacement, which pulls the suspended beams upward and in-turn places tension on the membrane.Between the highest points and the lateral bracing, polyester straps were integrated, which transfers forces from the bracing to the steel structure while also providing redundancy to keep the structure’s stability in the event the membrane is damaged.
In RFEM, a global model was created for the form-finding process as well as for the membrane and supporting steel structure design. In order to comply with all required clearance profiles and avoid the formation of water pockets, a differentiated form-finding procedure was carried out including applying prestress forces to individual components, others a defined target length, and some were excluded from the form-finding process altogether in order to adapt to the given boundary conditions according to their stiffness. The membrane fabric was modeled as an orthotropic surface.
Project Location
Selhurstpark Rd, Chichester PO18 0PSKeywords
Membrane structure Cable structure Roof structure PVC membrane Form-finding Pattern planning Water pocket formation Pylon
Write Comment...
Write Comment...
Contact us
Do you have questions or need advice?
Contact our free e-mail, chat, or forum support or find various suggested solutions and useful tips on our FAQ page.
![[DE] CP 001185 | Champagne Bar - Goodwood Racecourse, United Kingdom](/-/media/Images/netgenium/thumbnails/2/9/6/4/9/2964977/2964977.png?la=en&mw=348&mlid=1B276AD81B064D74B359A0DA1E3DB392&hash=9E3728A472F35C794D166E0A84E151676420FE21)
New
CSA S16:19 Stability Considerations and the New Annex O.2
Structure stability is not a new phenomenon when referring to steel design. The Canadian steel design standard CSA S16 and the most recent 2019 release is no exception.
SHAPE-THIN determines the effective cross-sections according to EN 1993-1-3 and EN 1993-1-5 for cold-formed sections. You can optionally check the geometric conditions for the applicability of the standard specified in EN 1993‑1‑3, Section 5.2.
The effects of local plate buckling are considered according to the method of reduced widths and the possible buckling of stiffeners (instability) is considered for stiffened sections according to EN 1993-1-3, Section 5.5.
As an option, you can perform an iterative calculation to optimize the effective cross-section.
You can display the effective cross-sections graphically.
Read more about designing cold-formed sections with SHAPE-THIN and RF-/STEEL Cold-Formed Sections in this technical article: Design of a Thin-Walled, Cold-Formed C-Section According to EN 1993-1-3.
-
Why are my steel members not being designed for stability in RF-STEEL AISC?
- My section is classified as Class 4 and non-designable in RF-/STEEL CSA. However, my manual calculation shows a different class. Why the difference?
-
Can I export my cutting pattern?
- I have defined temperature loads, strain loads, or a precamber. As soon as I modify stiffnesses, the deformations are no longer plausible.
- Can the properties, such as B. the cross -section or the surface thickness as well as the material of a surface of an existing element for a new element?
- I am trying to manually check the deformations from the CRANEWAY add-on module. However, I obtain great deviations. How to explain the differences?
- What should be considered when using a failure of columns under tension in the RF‑/DYNAM Pro – Equivalent Loads add-on module?
- Why is there no stability analysis displayed in the results despite the activation of the stability analysis in RF‑/STEEL EC3?
- How can I model and design a crane runway girder with Dlubal Software?
- How do I model a suspended membrane roof structure with line supports?
Programs Used for Structural Analysis
Main Program
Structural engineering software for finite element analysis (FEA) of planar and spatial structural systems consisting of plates, walls, shells, members (beams), solids and contact elements
3,540.00 USD
Add-on Module
Form-finding of tensile membrane and cable structures
1,750.00 USD
Add-on Module
Design of steel members according to Eurocode 3
1,480.00 USD
