Blast Time History Analysis in RFEM
Information about the Free Webinar
Everything I Expected and More
"RFEM is everything I expected and more. I’m having a blast learning the software and the webinars are fantastic."
Nicholas J. Greven P.Eng.
23 July 2019
This webinar demonstrates structural blast loading utilizing a time history analysis in RFEM.
Recorded Webinar
Date | Time
Event Language
EnglishContent
Blast Time History Analysis in RFEMThis webinar demonstrates structural blast loading utilizing a time history analysis in RFEM.
Time Schedule
| 00:00 | Introduction |
| 02:36 | Blast load concepts acc. to AISC DG 26 |
| 13:55 | AISC DG 26 blast analysis example |
| 24:09 | RFEM model and loading review |
| 29:57 | Natural vibration analysis in RF-DYNAM Pro - Natural Vibrations |
| 35:50 | Linear time history analysis in RF-DYNAM Pro - Forced Vibrations |
| 55:00 | Nonlinear time history analysis in RF-DYNAM Pro - Nonlinear Time History |
| 59:05 | Conclusion |
Presentation Model to Download
Below, under Models to Download, you will find the model(s) used in the webinar. This will allow you to independently follow the webinar step by step with the provided model after the presentation is complete.
Speaker
Amy Heilig, PE
CEO - USA Office
Sales & Technical Support Engineer
Amy Heilig is the CEO of the USA office located in Philadelphia, PA. In addition, she provides sales and technical support and continues to aid in the development of Dlubal Software programs for the North American market.
Keywords
Free online webinar Dynamic Time History Nonlinear Time History Blast Explosion FEA AISC DG 26 UFC 3-340-02
Downloads
Links
Write Comment...
Write Comment...
Contact us
Do you have questions related to our webinars? Are you looking for suggestions on which webinar is relevant for your design projects?
Contact us via our free e-mail, chat, or forum support or use our FAQ page.
New
Separate Load Entry for Structure or Foundation Design
In RF-/FOUNDATION Pro, the foundation design requires the definition the corresponding loading (load cases, load combinations, or result combinations) for the different design situations (STR, GEO, UPL or EQU).
![Distribution of Forces and Moments in Column Base According to [1]](/-/media/Images/website/img/000001-010000/009601-009700/009638.png?la=en&mlid=7D34CEAAE7354583A29169095622B515&hash=D5A1CD829CEAC6F92DF0C68F3F0F37A7E0C0E89B)
SHAPE-THIN | Cold-Formed Sections
SHAPE-THIN determines the effective cross-sections according to EN 1993-1-3 and EN 1993-1-5 for cold-formed sections. You can optionally check the geometric conditions for the applicability of the standard specified in EN 1993‑1‑3, Section 5.2.
The effects of local plate buckling are considered according to the method of reduced widths and the possible buckling of stiffeners (instability) is considered for stiffened sections according to EN 1993-1-3, Section 5.5.
As an option, you can perform an iterative calculation to optimize the effective cross-section.
You can display the effective cross-sections graphically.
Read more about designing cold-formed sections with SHAPE-THIN and RF-/STEEL Cold-Formed Sections in this technical article: Design of a Thin-Walled, Cold-Formed C-Section According to EN 1993-1-3.
- How do I display some results of all load cases in the printout report, but other results of the selected load cases only?
- Is it also possible to subsequently deactivate the symbols for the FE mesh refinement in an existing graphic in a printout report?
- What is the difference between SHAPE -THIN 9 and SHAPE -THIN 8?
- SHAPE‑THIN calculates a very small shear area. Why?
- When calculating a connection using the FRAME‑JOINT Pro add-on module, a message appears saying that the value is out of the valid range (existing value: 108, minimum value 100, maximum value 100). What does this message mean?
- I have a trapezoidal roof structure that is supported by beams. However, the moments on the beams are smaller than they should be. What could be the reason for this?
- How can I export the effective lengths from the RF‑STABILITY add-on module to Excel?
- In the RF‑/STEEL EC3 add-on module, I have selected two bracings with the same size as the shear panel type in the "Parameters" window for a beam to be designed. Thus, the beam should be supported laterally in the middle. Why is the eigenvector arbitrary anyhow?
- Why are some load cases displayed in red in RF-STEEL EC3?
- Why are the equivalent member designs grayed out in the Stability tab when activating the plastic designs by using the partial internal force method (RF‑/STEEL Plasticity)?
