Design of Big Openings in Beams and Downstand Beams
Possibilities in RFEM
Since a direct consideration of openings in beams and downstand beams is currently not possible, a solution must be found with the existing tools. An input in RF-CONCRETE Members is not possible so that it is necessary to use surfaces here.
Modeling downstand beams can be performed with surfaces without difficulty. With the possibility to evaluate internal forces from the surface calculation with result beams as member internal forces, it is then possible to perform member design.
The concrete beam or downstand beam is modeled as surface model instead of, as usual, a member beam or rib. Afterwards, a result beam is modeled in this surface in which the internal forces from the surface calculation are integrated over the desired area.
The same action takes place, as shown in Figure 02, for the smaller cross-sections around the openings. The respective cross-section of the integrated surfaces is assigned to the result beams as cross-section.
For the design of the result beam in RF-CONCRETE Members, the internal forces in surfaces are converted to member internal forces. Only then will it be possible to evaluate the internal forces in surfaces meaningfully.
The member design is performed as usual in RF-CONCRETE Members. The reinforcement areas are defined according to the member internal forces in the result beam and have to be adjusted if necessary to create the transitions between main member and openings reasonably. Due to the calculation of the chords in the openings as compression and tension member, rebar diameter or reinforcement content often differ.
Further Considerations in Case of Big Openings
In addition to the reinforcement determined in RFEM, further details have to be considered for the reinforcement of openings. The anchorage length of the reinforcement above and below the opening should be selected in such a way as to sufficiently anchor the concrete strut at an inclination of concrete strut of 45°. Furthermore, it is necessary to provide a suspended reinforcement at both ends of the opening to transfer the arising transversal tension forces. Their calculation can be performed, for example, according to booklet 566 or 599 of DAfStb (German Committee for Structural Concrete). Both methods are presented in .
Do you have questions or need advice?
Contact our free e-mail, chat, or forum support or find various suggested solutions and useful tips on our FAQ page.
Models to Download
Knowledge Base Articles
Concrete on its own is characterized by its compressive strength. To have reinforced concrete, the participation of reinforcing steels contributes to it thanks to their resistance capacity both in compression and especially in traction.
Optimization of Reinforcement; Top: Without Adaptations, Bottom: Adjusted Longitudinal Reinforcement
Product Features Articles
The material model Orthotropic Masonry 2D is an elastoplastic model that additionally allows softening of the material, which can be different in the local x- and y-direction of a surface. The material model is suitable for (unreinforced) masonry walls with in-plane loads.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
- When calculating deformations in RF‑CONCRETE Members, I get jumps in the deformation diagram. Why?
- I get Error 108 when designing steel stress in RF‑CONCRETE Surfaces. Why?
- I do not obtain any deformations in the results of the calculation with RF‑CONCRETE Surfaces. What can be the reason?
- When determining internal forces in RFEM, I obtain compression axial forces that do not arise in the design internal forces in the design in RF‑CONCRETE Surfaces. Why, what is the reason?
- Is it also possible to reduce the shear force on a support or perform design with the shear force at a distance d to the support in RF‑CONCRETE Surfaces?
- When performing "manual definition of the reinforcement areas" in RF‑CONCRETE Surfaces, do I have to completely reinforce the entire structural component manually? Or does RF‑CONCRETE Surfaces apply the required reinforcement in the areas where I have not performed the manual definition?
- When I create a user-defined result value, the RFEM solver window opens briefly and the calculation is apparently performed again. Why? I have already performed the calculation before.
- For design with CONCRETE NL, is the creep applied to the entire cross-section, or to the concrete compression zone only?
- Can I design a reinforced concrete structure according to ÖNORM in RFEM?
- Why can I no longer display the intermediate results in RF‑CONCRETE Members?
Structural engineering software for finite element analysis (FEA) of planar and spatial structural systems consisting of plates, walls, shells, members (beams), solids and contact elements
Design of reinforced concrete members and surfaces (plates, walls, planar structures, shells)