The new RF‑/DYNAM Pro - Natural Vibrations module has been available since RFEM version 5.04.xx and RSTAB version 8.04.xx were released. Masses can now be imported directly from load cases and load combinations.
The national parameters of EN 1992‑1‑1 for each country can be exported from RF‑/CONCRETE, RF‑/CONCRETE Columns, and RF‑/FOUNDATION Pro. To do this, there are interfaces with MS Excel, OpenOffice, and CSV. By exporting the national parameters, you can edit them in (for example) MS Excel, and display possible differences between the individual National Annexes clearly (see the image).
RF‑/FOUNDATION Pro introduced the geotechnical design of single foundations according to EN 1997‑1 in RFEM 5 and RSTAB 8. Depending on the National Annex preset in the add‑on module, you can determine the bearing resistance using Approach 2 or 3 in compliance with EN 1997‑1 up to Version x.04.0108.
Various optimizations are available with program version x.06.1103. The RF-/FOUNDATION Pro add-on module has also been subjected to further development.
For structural components consisting of slabs, it is necessary to perform shear design on the locations with concentrated load introduction, applying the punching shear design rules according to Sect. 6.4 of EN 1992‑1‑1 [1]. The concentrated load introduction is present on the individual locations; for example, by columns, concentrated load, or nodal supports. In addition, the end of linear load introduction on slabs is also regarded as concentrated load introduction. For example, this includes wall ends, wall corners, and ends or corners of line loads and line supports. You can perform the punching shear design for floor slabs or foundations, considering the existing available plate topology about the designed node of punching shear. The punching shear design according to EN 1992‑1‑1 checks that the acting shear force vEd does not exceed the resistance vRd.
For the ultimate limit state design, EN 1998-1 Section 2.2.2 and 4.4.2.2 [1] requires the calculation considering the second-order theory (P-Δ effect). This effect may be neglected only if the interstory drift sensitivity coefficient θ is less than 0.1.
As an alternative to the conventional automatic arrangement of surface reinforcement in RF-CONCRETE Surfaces, it is also possible to set it according to the individual requirements. This is advantageous for the creation of reinforcement drawings, for example, as the reinforcement areas can be clearly defined and dimensioned.
As of program version x.06.1103, you can enter a soil profile in RF‑/FOUNDATION Pro. This gives you the advantage of setting several soil layers with different soil parameters above and below the foundation base. To enter the soil layers, there is a library with various soil types that can also be extended with user‑defined soils. The user-defined soil profile is shown in an interactive information graphic. Any change (for example, a soil thickness modification) is reflected in the graphic immediately.
The RF‑PUNCH Pro add‑on module allows you to perform the punching shear design of floor slabs and foundation plates according to EN 1992‑1‑1. In the case of a floor slab, the basic control perimeter is applied according to 6.4.2 (1), EN 1992‑1‑1 [1] at a distance of 2d from the loaded area.
Downstand beams or T-beams are often used in reinforced concrete structures. In contrast to the previous representation and calculation options where, for example, a downstand beam was considered as a fixed support and the determined support reaction was applied to a separate member structure using a T-beam section, the ultimate structural FEA software like RFEM allow you to consider the structure as a whole and thus achieve a more precise analysis.
For the serviceability limit state design according to Section 6.6 of Eurocode EN 1997‑1, settlement has to be calculated for spread foundations. RF-/FOUNDATION Pro allows you to perform the settlement calculation for a single foundation. For this, you can chose between an elastic and a solid foundation. By defining a soil profile, it is possible to consider several soil layers under the foundation base. The results of the settlement, foundation tilting, and vertical soil contact stress distribution are displayed graphically and in tables to provide a quick and clear overview of the calculation performed. In addition to the design of the foundation settlement in RF-/FOUNDATION Pro, the structural analysis determines the representative spring constants for the support and can be exported to the structural model of RFEM or RSTAB.
Generally, avoiding cracking in concrete structures is neither possible nor necessary. However, cracking must be limited in a way so that the proper use, appearance, and durability of the structure are not affected. Therefore, limiting the crack width does not mean preventing from the crack formation, but restricting the crack width to harmless values.
In addition to the reinforced concrete design according to EN 1992‑1‑1, RF-/FOUNDATION Pro allows you to perform geotechnical designs according to EN 1997‑1. In RF-/FOUNDATION Pro, the design of the allowable soil pressure is performed as a ground failure resistance design. If you select CEN as National Annex, you have two options for defining the ground failure resistance. First, you can directly specify the allowable characteristic value of the soil pressure σRk. Second, there is also the option to analytically determine the bearing capacity according to [1], Annex D.
In the case of combined FEM structures (surface and member elements) as well as folded plate structures, it is possible to attribute a beam structure for the design on a member to a fictitious T-beam cross-section, whose geometry depends on the effective width. When using the "Rib" member type in RFEM, the stiffness is represented by a slab component (surface element) and a web component (member element). This approach has some design specifics that are explained in this article.
Heat loss due to external components without thermal decoupling of the internal components is enormous. For this reason, external structural components are thermally separated from the building envelope using a special built-in component. For the connection of a balcony slab with a reinforced concrete floor, Schöck Isokorb® or HALFEN HIT Insulated Connection can be used, for example. For the design of such built-in components, the respective technical approval must be taken into account. The following article shows an example of considering Schöck Isokorb® in the FEM calculation.
In the construction process, it is often necessary to fabricate the concrete elements in sections. A classic example of this production in sections is the use of prefabricated downstand beams, in which the slab is completed in the onsite concrete construction. By creating a new concrete area, interfaces may arise between the already hardened concrete and the fresh concrete. The transfer of the longitudinal shear forces arising between the partial cross-sections must be considered in the design.
The RF-PUNCH Pro add-on module allows you to perform punching shear designs according to EN 1992‑1‑1 [1]. In addition to the design checks of single columns, wall ends and wall corners can be analyzed in RF‑PUNCH Pro. At this point, I would also like to reference a previous article about RF‑PUNCH Pro, which explains how to determine punching load on wall ends and wall corners.
According to Clause 7.3.2 (2), standard DIN EN 1992-1-1 requires: "In profiled cross‑sections like T‑beams and box girders, the minimum reinforcement should be determined for the individual parts of the section (webs, flanges)." In the case of a floor beam with a T‑section, the minimum reinforcement should be determined for both flanges and the web if the corresponding partial cross‑sections are in the tension area. Image 01 shows the division into partial cross-sections.
If an aluminum member section is comprised of slender elements, failure can occur due to the local buckling of the flanges or webs before the member can reach full strength. In the add-on module RF-/ALUMINUM ADM, there are now three options for determining the nominal flexural strength for the limit state of local buckling, Mnlb, from Section F.3 in the 2015 Aluminum Design Manual. The three options include sections F.3.1 Weighted Average Method, F.3.2 Direct Strength Method, and F.3.3 Limiting Element Method.
Using RF-/FOUNDATION Pro, it is possible to perform geotechnical design according to EN 1997‑1 [1] for single foundations. Subsequently, the program displays detailed information about the influence of the ground water level on the selected design according to EN 1997‑1.
RFEM and the RF-CONCRETE add-on modules provide various options for the deformation analysis of a T-beam in the cracked state (state II). This technical article describes the calculation methods (C) and modeling options (M). Both the calculation methods and the modeling options are not limited to T-beams, but will only be explained using this system as an example.
In the case of a large amount of reinforcement, it might be useful to grade the longitudinal reinforcement of a beam, which means: curtailment. The grading corresponds to the tensile force distribution. Using RF-CONCRETE Members and CONCRETE, you can specify the curtailment of the reinforcement, which is considered in the automatically proposed reinforcement for the longitudinal reinforcement. When determining this reinforcement proposal, it is necessary to ensure that the envelope of the acting tensile force can be absorbed.
RFEM and RSTAB allow you easily to consider wind load effects on a three-dimensional building according to ASCE/SEI 7‑16. This article explains the complex theory of entering wind loads in the software. You can find the wind load under "Tools" → "Generate Loads" → "From Wind Loads".
When designing reinforced concrete components according to EN 1992‑1‑1 [1], nonlinear methods of determining internal forces for the ultimate and serviceability limit states are possible. In this case, the internal forces and deformations are determined with respect to their nonlinear behaviour. The analysis of stresses and strains in cracked state usually provides the deflections, which clearly exceed the linearly determined values.
In order to ensure the effects of panels, which should act as tensile or compression chords, it is necessary to connect them to the web in a shear-resistant manner. This connection is obtained in a similar way as the shear transfer in the joint between concreting sections by using the interaction between compressive struts and ties. In order to ensure the shear resistance, it must be verified that the compressive strut resistance is given and the tie force can be absorbed by the transverse reinforcement.
Eurocode 1, Parts 1 to 3, and American standard ASCE/SEI 7-16 describe the general effects due to snow loads. The load applications for duopitch, monopitch, and flat roofs required by the standards are stored in a tool in RFEM and RSTAB so that these effects can be generated easily.
Using RF-/FOUNDATION Pro, it is possible to perform geotechnical design according to EN 1997-1 [1] for single foundations. The following article explains the design of highly eccentric loading in the foundation core according to DIN EN 1997‑1, A 6.6.5 (see [3]).
The efficient design of prestressed structural components requires a few additional steps that go beyond the standard reinforced concrete design, from modeling tendons to the calculation of equivalent loads to the cross-section resistance design. Therefore, it is important that the software for prestressed concrete design is structured and the navigation is possible in the program. RFEM 5, with two add-on modules, RF-TENDON and RF-TENDON Design, fulfills these requirements and allows engineers to carry out the complete design of prestressed beams, frames, plates, buildings, and bridges according to EN 1992‑1‑1 with National Annexes and SIA 262.
In a multi-modal response spectrum analysis, it is important to determine a sufficient number of eigenvalues of the structure and to consider their dynamic responses. Regulations such as EN 1998‑1 [1] and other international standards require the activation of 90% of the structural mass. This means: to determine so many eigenvalues that the sum of the effective modal mass factors is greater than 0.9.