We provide hints and tips to help you get started with the basic program RFEM.
Home Support & Learning Learning Videos FAQ 003586 | I have modeled a floor slab with a downstand beam that intersects a continuous column. How can I prevent the slab from resting on the column, but on the downstand beam only?
FAQ 003586 | I have modeled a floor slab with a downstand beam that intersects a continuous column. How can I prevent the slab from resting on the column, but on the downstand beam only?
Video
First Steps with RFEM
Question
I have modeled a floor slab with a downstand beam that intersects a continuous column. How can I prevent the slab from resting on the column, but on the downstand beam only?Answer
To ensure that the floor only rests on the downstand beam in this situation (Figure 01), it is recommended to model a minimum opening within the floor surface, see Figure 02.
Figure 01 - Isometry, Transparent
Figure 02 - Surface with Opening
In order to keep the members or the lines of the members integrated into the surface, you can apply the "Connect Lines/Members" function subsequently to the entire model at once. Thus, it is ensured that the floor slab is still on the downstand beams.
Keywords
Dlubal FAQ Load application Downstand beam Column Slab Support Frequently Asked Question FAQ about Dlubal Question and Answer about Dlubal
Links
Contact us
Do you have any questions about our products or need advice on selecting the products needed for your projects?
Contact us via our free e-mail, chat, or forum support or find various suggested solutions and useful tips on our FAQ page.
Recommended Events
Eurocode 5 | Timber structures according to EN 1995-1-1
Online Training 03/17/2021 8:30 AM - 12:30 PM CET
Eurocode 3 | Steel structures according to DIN EN 1993-1-1
Online Training 03/18/2021 8:30 AM - 12:30 PM CET
Eurocode 3 | Steel structures according to DIN EN 1993-1-1
Online Training 05/06/2021 8:30 AM - 12:30 PM
Eurocode 2 | Concrete structures according to DIN EN 1992-1-1
Online Training 05/11/2021 8:30 AM - 12:30 PM
Eurocode 5 | Timber structures according to DIN EN 1995-1-1
Online Training 05/20/2021 8:30 AM - 12:30 PM
RFEM | Structural dynamics and earthquake design according to EC 8
Online Training 06/02/2021 8:30 AM - 12:30 PM
Videos
Models to Download
Knowledge Base Articles
New
Displaying Resulting Support Force
In RFEM 5 and RSTAB 8, you can display the resulting support force related to the centroid of the model. It can be used, for example, to check the model and load data.
Screenshots
Product Features Articles
New
Increased Calculation Performance by Reducing the Nodal Degrees of Freedom
The number of degrees of freedom in a node is no longer a global calculation parameter in RFEM (6 degrees of freedom for each mesh node in 3D models, 7 degrees of freedom for the warping torsion analysis). Thus, each node is generally considered with a different number of degrees of freedom, which leads to a variable number of equations in the calculation.
This modification speeds up the calculation, especially for models where a significant reduction of the system could be achieved (e.g. trusses and membrane structures).
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
- How can I create a curved or curved section?
- Does the load generation also work for curved members?
- I would like to calculate and design "temporary structures." What do I need for this?
- How is an inflatable object simulated in RFEM?
- I design timber components. The deformations of load combinations deviate from the manual calculation exactly by the factor of the material partial safety factor. Why?
- I often edit the reinforcement provided by the program. Adjusting the reinforcement by using coordinates takes much effort and time if having several beams in the model. Is there any way to speed up the reinforcement editing?
- Which programs can I use to calculate and design power plants?
- Which filter settings should be selected in the material library for concrete in order to perform design in RF‑CONCRETE according to the Swedish National Annex? In RFEM, there is no Swedish standard group available for the selection.
- I have analyzed two models of an inclined bored pile as a support with defined spring stiffness. A surface that can be moved horizontally (globally) is used for the force transmission. The bored pile in Model A is a support inclined by 15° with a spring stiffness of 2,000 kN/m in the axial direction. The bored pile of Model B is a support with the defined spring stiffnesses, divided into the respective horizontal and vertical components. The value of the spring stiffness is always the same (2,000 kN/m). In my opinion, both models are equivalent. Why are there different results in the deformation anyway?
- In the filter settings for the values on surfaces, you can display a certain range of results and hide the rest. How can I hide a certain range of values and display the rest?
Customer Projects