Downstand Beams, Ribs, T-Beams: Modeling and Determination of Internal Forces
Downstand beams or T-beams are often used in reinforced concrete structures. In contrast to the previous representation and calculation options where, for example, a downstand beam was considered as a fixed support and the determined support reaction was applied to a separate member structure using a T-beam section, ultimate structural FEA software like RFEM allows you to consider the structure as a whole and thus achieve a more precise analysis.
Advantages of Representation Using Rib Member Type in RFEM
The rigidity or flexibility of a downstand beam is considered. Thus, its influence on the distribution of internal forces and the deformation can be represented.
There are two essential parameters for a rib in a 3D position. First, there is the integration width that defines the area for the integration of internal forces. For this, the integration area on each side must not exceed several surfaces. Second, the rib alignment has to be defined. The position data refer to the local axis system of the surface, including the rib.
As a cross-section of the rib, it is necessary to define a cross-section part that is additionally available on the surface. For the design of a T-beam, the program generates a gross cross-section of the T-beam.
Determination of Internal Forces for Design
Before the design, the internal forces and the relation to the centroid of the T-beam (usually T-section or L-section) are determined. For this, the internal force component of the plate and the rib component are integrated. The internal forces are integrated as perpendicular to the rib axis.
For the plate component, the following internal forces result from the integration of the internal forces in surfaces. It is assumed that the local axis systems of the rib and the surface are the same. If these should not be the same, the internal forces must be previously transformed to the local axis system of the rib.
The internal forces of the rib component correspond to the internal forces of the member, including the rib cross-section. In RFEM, it is possible to display the internal forces without the included surface components to evaluate internal forces. You can adjust this in Project Navigator - Display under "Results" - "Ribs - Effective Contribution on Surface/Member".
The resulting internal forces of the T-beam are obtained where the internal forces of the plate and rib component refer to the centroid of the T-beam section.
The bending moment of the resulting T-beam can be obtained for a T-section, for example, as follows:
My = My,plate + My,rib - eplate ∙ Nplate + erib ∙ Nrib
The program always determines the resulting internal forces of T-beam sections in accordance with the default setting.
Rib in 2D
Basically, it is not a purely two-dimensional problem in the case of T-beams. Users need to be aware that the consideration of ribs in 2D necessarily comes with a simplification. Since the alignment of eccentric elements is not possible in 2D, the centroidal axis of the T-beam section runs in the surface plane. This approach requires additional steps when considering the stiffness of the structure.
In addition to the parameters of the rib in 3D, further parameters of the rib in 2D have to be applied in order to consider the stiffness of the T-beam section. By internally considering the rib in 2D, the superimposing stiffness results in the integration width area b1 and b2. Therefore, the reduction of the surface stiffness in the integration width area is active due to the default setting of the rib parameters. However, you should note that this application leads to the stiffness concentration along the rib axis, which thus does not occur in reality nor in the display of the rib in 3D.
Since the eccentricity in 2D cannot be displayed, the influence of the eccentricity on the stiffness (i.e., the additional Steiner components) is considered. For torsional stiffness, part of the T-beam section and the surface are superimposed. The torsional stiffness activity of the T-beam section can be reduced manually. Generally, it is impossible to specify a reduction factor or a percentage value for the effective torsional stiffness, because this depends on the cross-section geometry.
Therefore, it is better to use the 3D version of RFEM instead of the 2D version to represent the downstand beams.
Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Adrian Langhammer
Product Engineering & Customer Support
Mr. Langhammer is responsible for the development of the add-on modules for reinforced concrete, and provides technical support for our customers.
Do you have questions or need advice?
Contact our free e-mail, chat, or forum support or find various suggested solutions and useful tips on our FAQ page.
This article compares the design with the one in the following article: Design of Concrete Columns Subjected to Axial Compression with RF-CONCRETE Members. It is therefore about taking exactly the same theoretical application carried out in RF-CONCRETE Members and reproducing it in RF-CONCRETE Columns. Thus, the objective is to compare the different input parameters and the results obtained by the two add-on modules for the design of column-like concrete members.
The material model Orthotropic Masonry 2D is an elastoplastic model that additionally allows softening of the material, which can be different in the local x- and y-direction of a surface. The material model is suitable for (unreinforced) masonry walls with in-plane loads.
- In RF‑CONCRETE Surfaces, I obtain a high amount of reinforcement in relation to a lever arm that is almost zero. How is such a small lever arm of internal forces created?
- When converting from the manual definition of reinforcement areas to the automatic arrangement of reinforcement according to Window 1.4, the result of the deformation calculation differs, although the basic reinforcement has not been modified. What is the reason for this change?
- Does the program check the lap length of the vertical stirrups of a block foundation with smooth bucket sides?
- Why do I get a discontinuous area in the distribution of internal forces? In the area of the supported line, the shear force VEd shows a jump, which does not seems to be plausible.
- When comparing RF‑CONCRETE Columns with another design software, I get different results. How to explain the differences?
- Is it possible to perform design without an additional reinforcement in RF‑CONCRETE Surfaces?
I have installed Halfen HDB 13.60 on my PC. The version does not seem to be compatible with RF-PUNCH Pro anymore. The interface does not work. I am using version 5.26.02 of RFEM.
The design criterion for VEd/VRd,c is displayed as governing, although there should be a shear reinforcement designed. Also, the design of VEd/VRds is missing. Why is that?
- Which calculation method is the basis for the stability analysis in RF‑CONCRETE Columns?
- Is it possible to enter a curtailed reinforcement in RF‑CONCRETE Columns?
Structural engineering software for finite element analysis (FEA) of planar and spatial structural systems consisting of plates, walls, shells, members (beams), solids and contact elements