Canal Bridge Structure Over Ems River No. 911 N – Bypass, Germany
The Ems Canal Bridge (KBr), built in the 1930s, will be renovated at DEK-km 78.806N as part of the German Dortmund-Ems Canal (DEK) expansion effort. A double half-through bridge is planned for the new structure, where construction will begin while the shipment is in progress.
Federal Waterways and Shipping Agency, WNA Datteln, Germany
|Structural Design, Superstructure Planning Execution||
Meyer + Schubart VBI, Wunstorf, Germanywww.meyer-schubart.de
|Steel Superstructure Execution||
SEH Engineering GmbH, Hanover, Germany
At the beginning of the renovation, a bypass route will be constructed: The longitudinal insertion of the half-through bridge into the bypass location took place in October 2020. The bridge will be moved to its final position after the second section is complete.
Dlubal's customer Meyer+Schubart from Wunstorf (Germany) provided the structural design as well as the superstructure execution planning. The entire steel superstructure was modeled and designed as a 3D model in RFEM, using planar shell elements.
The half-through bridge spans 205 ft with a total width of 118 ft. It is supported on 108-foot-wide, 22-foot-thick and 18-foot-high abutments. Three spherical supports are provided for each support. In the water-filled operating state, support forces of up to 7,870 kips act on the outer supports.
Between the tail units, the navigable width is 85 ft and the hydraulic width is 92 ft. On the sides (top of the barrier walls) are 16-foot-wide (east side) and 10-foot-wide (west side) service paths. The bridge bottom forms the bottom chord and the service paths form the cross-section top chord for the structural design.
For the design of the canal bridge, variable actions such as hydrostatic + hydrodynamic actions, ice load + ice pressure, temperature, as well as extraordinary actions such as disaster vessel impact (vessel impact with a 6° approach angle), and a sunken vessel load were applied. The structure is designed for 100 years of service life, according to Eurocode.
Do you have questions or need advice?
Contact our free e-mail, chat, or forum support or find various suggested solutions and useful tips on our FAQ page.
Extension of the RF-/STEEL Warping Erosion module | Lateral -torsional buckling analyzes of members according to the second -order theory with 7 degrees of freedom
RFEM/RSTAB add-on module RF-/JOINTS Steel-Tower | Hinged connections of lattice tower members according to EC 3
RFEM/RSTAB Add-on Module RF-IMP/RSIMP | Generation of Geometric Replacement Imperfections and Pre-deformed Replacement Structures
RFEM/RSTAB add-on module RF-/JOINTS Steel-Column Base | Hinged and restrained column bases according to EC 3
RF-/PLATE-BUCKLING Add-on Module for RFEM/RSTAB | Plate Buckling Analysis for Plates with or Without Stiffeners According to 1993-1-5
RFEM/RSTAB add-on module RF-/TOWER effective lengths | Determination of effective lengths of lattice towers
RF-/HOHLPROF add-on module for RFEM/RSTAB | Ultimate limit state designs of welded hollow section connections according to EC 3
- How do I apply wind load on members of open structures?
- Is it also possible to use RF‑/TOWER Loading without the other TOWER add-on modules?
- I do not want to design a cross-section in the RF‑/STEEL EC3 add-on module. Can I quickly remove this cross-section from the selection?
- I have a roof structure resting on a steel column that runs to the foundations. The column runs through a perimeter wall that supports the false ceiling. A considerable part of the load from the roof is transferred to the wall. I want the steel column to carry all the vertical loads from the roof. How can I do it?
- Are the models and presentations from Info Day 2018 freely available, and can you send them to me?
- I encountered a sharing violation while importing a dxf file into SHAPE-THIN. What is the issue?
- How can I display membrane stresses in the results of RF‑STEEL Surfaces?
- What is the meaning of the superposition according to the CQC rule in a dynamic analysis??
- How is the automatic creation of c/t-parts carried out?
- I design a set of members by using the equivalent member method in RF‑/STEEL EC3, but the calculation fails. The system is unstable, delivering the message "Non-designable - ER055) Zero value of the critical moment on the segment."What could be the reason?